Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Blends performance

Historically, blending was used to improve the impact strength of the early resins, i.e., toughening of PS, PVC, PMMA, PET, PA, etc. With time, blends evolved into multipolymer systems that not only have to be impact modified but also compatibilized. Many blends have been formulated with a multicomponent modifier that simultaneously compatibilizes and impact-modifies the mixtures. [Pg.34]

Wu (1985,1987,1988,1990) postulated that the brittle/ductile behavior of aneat amorphous polymer is controlled by two intrinsic molecular parameters the entanglement density, Ve, and the chain stiffness (given by the characteristic chain constant, Cqo). Assuming that crazing involves chain scission, the stress, a.  [Pg.34]

Formation of co-continuous stmctures in blends of either a brittle or pseudo-ductile resin with an elastomer may result in a quantum jump of toughness, without greatly affecting the key engineering properties of the high-performance resin. Conunercial blends of this type, e.g., POM, PA, PC, or PET with an elastomer, are available (viz., Triax series). [Pg.36]


There are tests for physical properties such as deasity and hardness (qv) of plastics. Microscopy (qv) is important ia fracture analysis as well as ia analysis of the morphology of polymer systems for an understanding of polymer blend performance. [Pg.156]

The main performance characteristics of light-duty liquids or dishwash blends are soil emulsification and foaming. Figueroa-Raulli [73] published a comparative study of AOS vs. alkyl sulfates (AS), alcohol ether sulfates (AES), and linear alkylbenzenesulfonates (LAS) in light-duty liquid blends. The blends were evaluated for flash foam, the stability of foam under accumulating soil loads, and for the number of plates washed. Blend performance is expressed as a percentage of a dishwash reference standard. [Pg.418]

Ruszkowski, S., A Rational Method for Measuring Blending Performance, and Comparison of Different Impeller Types . Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Mixing, Cambridge, UK, pp. 283-291 (1994). [Pg.227]

It is rare in actual applications that only one corrosion inhibitor is used. Synergistic blends of two or more inhibitors can take advantage of the strengths of each. Table 10-1 compares the performances of several of these blends to that of a chromate-zinc blend under different operating conditions. Note that while the chromate-zinc blend offers the best corrosion inhibition with no contaminants present and at high temperatures, other blends are close, and do not present the environmental problems that chromates do. With petroleum ether, hydrogen sulfide, or hexane contaminants present in the cooling water, the Polyphosphate-HEDP-Carboxylate blend performs the best, followed by Zinc-HEDP. [Pg.104]

Let s look at the wet granulation step, for example. We will want to learn whether or not it affects the dissolution of the drug, the final blend performance, the drying and milling procedures, and the final tablet compression performance. If QA is to result from the development effort, answers must be had. The task cannot be left only to the process development scientist to solve, however. Thus, the pragmatic approach to the scientific effort would be that the answer be developed through the partnership of the physical pharmacist, the formula-tor, and the process development engineer (or scientist). [Pg.786]

MIXING PERFORMANCE OF INLINE MIXERS 4.1. Macromixing (or Blending) Performance... [Pg.246]

One technique to make the pilot plant unit more similar to the plant scale unit is to use impellers of relatively narrow blade width compared to their traditional blade widths used with commercial impellers in the plant. This is purposely reducing the blending performance and improving the shear rate performance in the pilot plant by using impellers of relatively narrow blade width. The blade width cannot be so small that it gets out of proportion to the process participant particles. [Pg.303]

Let s go back to Example 10.2 and introduce a fed component with SG = 1 and /r = 120,000 cp. Thus, this example will give us a good indication of what blending performance we can expect from a 6BD operating at Nrc = 5. [Pg.288]

Figure 10.30. Comparison of the laminar regime blending performance of several pipeline static mixers as a function of mixer style and L/D of mixer. An inlet COV of 3 is assumed for the comparison basis. (Koch Engineering [1986]). Figure 10.30. Comparison of the laminar regime blending performance of several pipeline static mixers as a function of mixer style and L/D of mixer. An inlet COV of 3 is assumed for the comparison basis. (Koch Engineering [1986]).
With this low COV it may be possible to couple the HEV mixer directly to the reactor and not use 3 pipe diameters downstream of the mixer. To shorten the mixing system in this manner and maintain uniformity exceeding 99%, Kenics must guarantee the uniformity because the blending performance has only been published for L/D = 3 downstream of the mixer. [Pg.310]

The polyethylene mass flow rate is 1501bm/hr and the melt density is SSlbm/tf thus, the volumetric flow rate is (1501bm/hr)/(55 Ibrn/tf) = 2.73 fC/hr. The experimental results for the inlet and outlet temperature profiles are given in Figure 10.35. Let s determine the blending performance of the mixer from correlations and then relate that to the experimental data. [Pg.310]

Rotation speed impacts shear rate and therefore blending efficiency, especially when cohesive materials are being blended. However, the relationship between rotation speed and uniformity is affected by the complex nature of the flow of cohesive materials, and the number and size of avalanches per revolution. Blending performance in bench scale tumble blenders demonstrated that the rotation speed did not significantly impact the blending of free-flowing materials (5,20). [Pg.133]

A depth profiling method has been used to determine coexistence curves for a large group of systems [91,96] structurally similar to the h88/d78 and h66/d52 blends. Performed data analysis of profiled bilayers (with total D/w range 4-57) suggests [91] that while the linear %((])) form can describe all experimental bin-... [Pg.33]

A recently developed computer-based technique allows time spent in laboratory screening of solvent formulations for particular applications to be greatly reduced (I). In this method, blend performance properties are calculated by simple mixing rules from the properties of the component solvents, and a blend composition is chosen which will match a required set of properties while minimizing cost. Solvent blends formulated in this way have an excellent chance of success in subsequent laboratory tests. [Pg.64]

Flash point is an important solvent blend performance property. Mixture flash points cannot be predicted using linear mixing rules, and to date no literature describing a satisfactory method of predicting flash... [Pg.64]

The morphology of commercial blends usually is far from equilibrium. Preparation of the alloys must take thermodynamic and kinetic parameters into account if the desired effects are to be achieved. The effects of copolymer addition of the dispersion size and blend performance have been studied [Hobbs et al., 1983 Fayt et al., 1986 Armat and Moet, 1993]. [Pg.15]

Assessment of the quality of a mixture, or mixedness, is difficult and time consuming. Since the performance of blends is controlled by the optimum degree of dispersion, as well as by other factors e.g., compatibilization, adhesion in solid state, the level of degradation engendered during the blending, etc.), the mixedness must be considered a separated quantity, to be determined independently of the blends performance. [Pg.594]

Only in rare cases (mixtures with < 0.1, or compositions near the phase inversion) the compatibilization may not be necessary. However, even in these cases compatibilization has beneficial effects on blends performance. All the other immiscible blends should be compatibilized. [Pg.1127]

In the following text examples of recycled polymer blends will be given, first for the commodity, then for the engineering and specialty resin blends. Whenever possible, the methods of compatibilization and re-compatibilization should be the same. In particular, when recycling is to reproduce the original blends performance, the same compatibilization method is essential. For this reason, support of the blends manufacturer should be ascertained. [Pg.1144]

Zinc nitrate (Zn(N03)2, Aldrich) was dissolved in ethanol and an aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide was added drop by drop until the metal hydroxide was dissolved completely. Then an alcoholic solution of 1-dodecanethiol was added to this system at room temperature, under stirring, and the precipitate was isolated by vacuum filtration. The Zn mercaptide, Zn(SCi2H25)2, obtained was dissolved in chloroform and blended with polystyrene, leading to translucent films after solvent removal. The thermal annealing of zinc mercaptide/polystyrene blends, performed under nitrogen, at 250°C, gave a nanoscopic ZnS phase. [Pg.618]


See other pages where Blends performance is mentioned: [Pg.415]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.783]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.737]    [Pg.816]    [Pg.1390]    [Pg.1423]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.388]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.604 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info