Dry phase inversion

Recently, an in-depth review on molecular imprinted membranes has been published by Piletsky et al. [4]. Four preparation strategies for MIP membranes can be distinguished (i) in-situ polymerization by bulk crosslinking (ii) preparation by dry phase inversion with a casting/solvent evaporation process [45-51] (iii) preparation by wet phase inversion with a casting/immersion precipitation [52-54] and (iv) surface imprinting. 

Several selective interactions by MIP membrane systems have been reported. For example, an L-phenylalanine imprinted membrane prepared by in-situ crosslinking polymerization showed different fluxes for various amino acids [44]. Yoshikawa et al. [51] have prepared molecular imprinted membranes from a membrane material which bears a tetrapeptide residue (DIDE resin (7)), using the dry phase inversion procedure. It was found that a membrane which contains an oligopeptide residue from an L-amino acid and is imprinted with an L-amino acid derivative, recognizes the L-isomer in preference to the corresponding D-isomer, and vice versa. Exceptional difference in sorption selectivity between theophylline and caffeine was observed for poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) blend membranes prepared by the wet phase inversion technique [53]. 

Jansen, J. C., Macchione, M., and Drioli, E. (2005), High flux asymmetric gas separation membranes of modified poly(ether ether ketone) prepared by the dry phase inversion technique, /. Membr. Sci., 255,167-180. 

When solvents are removed solely by evaporation, the membrane formation is known as a dry phase inversion process [Resting, 1985]. When the phase separation and structure forma-... 

M. Macchione, J. C. Jansen, and E. Drioli. The dry phase inversion technique as a tool to produce highly efhcient asymmetric gas separation membranes of modified PEEK. Influence of temperature and air circulation. Desalination, 192(1-3) 132-141, May 2006. 

When solvents are removed solely by evaporation, the membrane formation is known as a dry phase inversion process (Resting 1985). When the phase separation and structure formation are achieved by immersion of a cast membrane in a quench medium, the process is known as a wet phase inversion process (Heffelfinger 1978). The latter process is used to prepare asymmetric membranes for either microfiltration (Roesink 1989), ultrafiltration (Michaels 1971), reverse... 

In an alternative approach, MIP membranes can be obtained by generating molec-ularly imprinted sites in a non-specific matrix of a synthetic or natural polymer material during polymer solidification. The recognition cavities are formed by the fixation of a polymer conformation adopted upon interaction with the template molecule. Phase inversion methods have used either the evaporation of polymer solvent (dry phase separation) or the precipitation of the pre-synthesised polymer (wet phase inversion process). The major difficulties of this method lay both in the appropriate process conditions allowing the formation of porous materials and recognition sites and in the stability of these sites after template removal due to the lack of chemical cross-linking. 

Asymmetric membranes are usually produced by phase inversion techniques. In these techniques, an initially homogeneous polymer solution becomes thermodynamically unstable due to different external effects and the phase separates into polymer-lean and polymer-rich phases. The polymer-rich phase forms the matrix of the membrane, while the polymer-lean phase, rich in solvents and nonsolvents, fills the pores. Four main techniques exist to induce phase inversion and thus to prepare asymmetric porous membranes [85] (a) thermally induced phase separation (TIPS), (b) immersion precipitation (wet casting), (c) vapor-induced phase separation (VIPS), and (d) dry (air) casting. 

Effect of Evaporation Condition Previous studies on more traditional applications have investigated the effect of increased air velocity, that is, forced-convection conditions for a combination of dry/wet phase inversion techniques to produce defect-free, ultrahigh flux asymmetric membranes with ultrathin skin layers [115-117]. To investigate the effect of evaporation condition on the release rate of drug, tablets were dip coated with CA solution containing 10% CA, 80% acetone, and 10% water and allowed to dry by blowing air across the surface with a blower (forced convection). As a comparison, tablets coated with the same solution were air dried under natural free-convection conditions. 

Pinnau, I., and Koros, W. (1991), Structures and gas separation property asymmetric polysulfone membranes made by dry, wet, and dry/wet phase-inversion, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 43,1491-1502. 

After completion of phase inversion, the polymer solution is dispersed in a 2-4-fold amount of water. Suspension aids used are water-soluble organic polymers, such as poly(vinyl alcohol) or polyvinylpyrrolidone, or inorganic compounds, such as Pickering systems. In order to achieve a final conversion of 99.5 %, initiator combinations with different decomposition times are used, and the polymerization follows a defined temperature-time profile. The suspension is then centrifuged, dried and compounded. 

Phase inversion is a process in which a polymer is transformed from a liquid to a solid state. There are a number of methods to achieve phase inversion. Among others, the dry-wet phase inversion technique and the temperature induced phase separation (TIPS) are most commonly used in the industrial membrane manufacturing. The dry-wet phase inversion technique was applied by Loeb and Sourirajan in their development... 

An integrally skinned asymmetric membrane with a porous skin layer (hereafter called substrate membrane) is prepared from a polymer solution by applying the dry-wet phase inversion method and dried according to the method described later, before being dipped into a bath containing a dilute solution of another polymer. When the membrane is taken out of the bath, a thin layer of coating solution is deposited on top of the substrate membrane. The solvent is then removed by evaporation, leaving a thin layer of the latter polymer on top of the substrate membrane. 

Cellulose acetate is the material for the first-generation reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. The announcement of cellulose acetate membranes for seawater desalination by Loeb and Sourirajan in 1960 triggered the applications of membrane separation processes in many industrial sectors. Cellulose acetate membranes are prepared by the dry-wet phase inversion technique. 

All of the above polymers have TgS higher than 145°C except for cellulose acetate. They are also stable chemically and mechanically. Also, their biodegradability is low. The membranes are made by the dry-wet phase inversion technique. 

Hydrophilic MF membranes can be made by the dry-wet phase inversion technique. The latter technique is also applicable in making PVDF membranes. On the other hand, other hydrophobic MF membranes are made by the TIPS technique. In particular, semicrystalline PE, PP, and PTFE are stretched parallel to the direction of film extrusion so that the crystalline regions are aligned to the direction of stretch, while the noncrystalline region is ruptured, forming long and narrow pores. Hydrophobic membranes do not allow penetration of water into the pore until the transmembrane pressure drop reaches a threshold pressure called liquid entry pressure of water. These membranes can therefore be used for membrane distillation. Tracketching method is applied to make MF membranes from PC. 

---