Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Atomic absorption spectrophotometry detection limits

Collect the reaction solutions containing mercury ions which remain following completion of the manganese determination. Per 500 ml of solution treat with 30 g of sodium thiosulphate and then with 300 ml of 30 % sodium hydroxide solution. In this process the mercury is removed from the solution as sulphide. Hg2+ ions are no longer detectable in the filtrate of the supernatant colourless liquid (flameless atomic-absorption spectrophotometry detection limit 0.001 mg/1). [Pg.313]

A method has been developed for differentiating hexavalent from trivalent chromium [33]. The metal is electrodeposited with mercury on pyrolytic graphite-coated tubular furnaces in the temperature range 1000-3000 °C, using a flow-through assembly. Both the hexa- and trivalent forms are deposited as the metal at pH 4.7 and a potential at -1.8 V against the standard calomel electrode, while at pH 4.7, but at -0.3 V, the hexavalent form is selectively reduced to the trivalent form and accumulated by adsorption. This method was applied to the analysis of chromium species in samples of different salinity, in conjunction with atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The limit of detection was 0.05 xg/l chromium and relative standard deviation from replicate measurements of 0.4 xg chromium (VI) was 13%. Matrix interference was largely overcome in this procedure. [Pg.67]

Electrothermal atomic absorption spectrophotometry with Zeeman background correction was used by Zhang et al. [141] for the determination of cadmium in seawater. Citric acid was used as an organic matrix modifier and was found to be more effective than EDTA or ascorbic acid. The organic matrix modifier reduced the interferences from salts and other trace metals and gave a linear calibration curve for cadmium at concentrations < 1.6 pg/1. The method has a limit of detection of 0.019 pg/1 of cadmium and recoveries of 95-105% at the 0.2 pg of cadmium level. [Pg.151]

Different methods have different detection limits. For example, the flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) method for aluminum has a detection limit of 30 parts per million, while the inductively coupled plasma... [Pg.38]

Lei et al. reported a method for the indirect determination of trace amounts of procaine in human serum by atomic absorption spectrophotometry [54], The sample was mixed with HCIO4, heated at 85°C for 30 minutes, diluted to a known volume with water, and centrifuged. 1 mL of the supernatant solution was buffered with 0.1 M sodium acetate-acetic acid to pH 3.86, and mixed with 0.2 M Zn(SCN)j reagent to a final concentration of 0.1 M. After dilution to 50 mL with water, the solution was shaken for 1 minute with 10 mL of 1,2-dichloroethane, whereupon the zinc extracted into the organic phase was determined by air-acetylene flame atomic absorption spectrometry for the indirect determination of procaine. The detection limit was found to be 0.1 pg/g, with a recovery of 89-98% and a coefficient of variation (n = 10) equal to 3.2%. [Pg.433]

The exploitation of atomic-absorption spectrophotometry for monitoring HPLC column effluents has been recently examined by Funasaka et al. [46]. An eluent-vaporizing system was designed which introduced the effluent into the atomic-absorption unit. The limit of detection of compounds such as ethylmercury chloride was ca. 10 ng compared to 30 jug for a UV detector at 210 nm. The extreme selectivity of atomic absorption could make this technique of great value for the analysis of trace amounts of organometallic compounds and metal chelates. [Pg.104]

Table 1 shows the detection limits of atomic absorption spectrophotometry for various metals. In general, flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry is quantitative in the lower parts-per-million levels and is readily automated for routine, high-volume samples. The other three techniques are used primarily for trace analysis and are quantitative to the lower parts-per-million levels for many elements. [Pg.3368]

The determination of technetium by atomic absorption spectrophotometry was studied with a Tc hollow-cathode lamp as a spectral line source. The sensitivity for technetium in aqueous solution was 3-10 g/ml in a fuel-rich acetylene-air flame for the unresolved 2614.23-2615.87 A doublet. Cationic interferences were eliminated by adding aluminum to the sample solutions. The applicability of atomic absorption spectrophotometry to the determination of technetium in uranium and a uranium alloy was demonstrated [42]. A detection limit of 6 10 g w as achieved for measuring technetium by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. In using the same doublet and both argon and neon as fill gases for the lamp, 6-10 to 3 10 g of technetium was found to be the range of applicability [43]. [Pg.58]

Analytical Methods and Speclatlon Electrothermal atomic absorption spectrophotometry (ETAAS), differential pulse adsorption voltammetry (DPAV), isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (ID-MS), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) furnish the requisite sensitivity for measurements of nickel concentrations in biological, technical and environmental samples (Aggarwal et al. 1989, Case et al. 2001, Stoeppler and Ostapczuk 1992, Templeton 1994, Todorovska et al. 2002, Vaughan and Templeton 1990, Welz and Sperling 1999). The detection limits for nickel determinations by ETAAS analysis with Zeeman background correction are approximately 0.45 jg for urine,... [Pg.842]

For the determination of trace elements in the soil, atomic absorption spectrophotometry is also very suitable. A solution should be obtained from the sample to be analysed, most frequently by a decomposition with hydrofluoric acid extracts can also be prepared from the samples to be analysed. The detection limits and sensitivities for this technique are shown in Table 7.7. [Pg.694]

For flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry, the detection limit Is defined as the concentration that produces absorption equivalent to twice the magnitude of the background fluctuation. No mention is made of the blank or blank correction. This definition implies an instrument detection limit rather than a detection limit of a complete analytical procedure. Finally, no mention Is made of the need to determine the variability of responses. [Pg.87]

Among the common metal ions, only aluminum and cobalt gave peaks when complexed with 8-quinolinol and eluted with SDS-acetonitrile mobile phases. However, the peaks appeared very close to each other with spectrophotometric detection (Fig. 12.2). The selective determination of aluminum was only possible with fluorimetric detection. The addition of SDS as well as several other surfactants to the aluminum complex solution, increased the fluorescence intensity. The procedure did not require deproteinization prior to analysis. The most commonly used technique for aluminum in human serum is graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry, which is often limited due to serum matrix interference. [Pg.440]

The determination of germanium by means of atomic absorption spectrophotometry at the end of the 1960s was replaced by the introduction of the hydride technique with sodium tetrahydroborate as means of reduction. The detection limit is indicated with 2 x lOr g and 0.01 xg Ge/liter [44]. [Pg.384]

In modern times, most analyses are performed on an analytical instrument for, e.g., gas chromatography (GC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), ultra-violet/visible (UV) or infrared (IR) spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), mass spectrometry. Each of these instruments has a limitation on the amount of an analyte that they can detect. This limitation can be expressed as the IDL, which may be defined as the smallest amount of an analyte that can be reliably detected or differentiated from the background on an instrument. [Pg.63]

Horwitz claims that irrespective of the complexity found within various analytical methods the limits of analytical variability can be expressed or summarized by plotting the calculated mean coefficient of variation (CV), expressed as powers of two [ordinate], against the analyte level measured, expressed as powers of 10 [abscissa]. In an analysis of 150 independent Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) interlaboratory collaborative studies covering numerous methods, such as chromatography, atomic absorption, molecular absorption spectroscopy, spectrophotometry, and bioassay, it appears that the relationship describing the CV of an analytical method and the absolute analyte concentration is independent of the analyte type or the method used for detection. [Pg.483]

In 1C, the election-detection mode is the one based on conductivity measurements of solutions in which the ionic load of the eluent is low, either due to the use of eluents of low specific conductivity, or due to the chemical suppression of the eluent conductivity achieved by proper devices (see further). Nevertheless, there are applications in which this kind of detection is not applicable, e.g., for species with low specific conductivity or for species (metals) that can precipitate during the classical detection with suppression. Among the techniques that can be used as an alternative to conductometric detection, spectrophotometry, amperometry, and spectroscopy (atomic absorption, AA, atomic emission, AE) or spectrometry (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, ICP-MS, and MS) are those most widely used. Hence, the wide number of techniques available, together with the improvement of stationary phase technology, makes it possible to widen the spectrum of substances analyzable by 1C and to achieve extremely low detection limits. [Pg.406]

In addition, some metals may be determined by other methods, including ion-selective electrode, ion chromatography, electrophoresis, neutron activation analysis, redox titration, and gravimetry. Atomic absorption or emission spectrophotometry is the method of choice, because it is rapid, convenient, and gives the low detection levels as required in the environmental analysis. Although colorimetry methods can give accurate results, they are time consuming and a detection limit below 10 pg/L is difficult to achieve for most metals. [Pg.84]

A mong the preferred analytical methods for determining mercury con-centrations in natural samples save been closed system reduction-aeration procedures using mercury detection by gas phase atomic absorption or atomic fluorescence spectrophotometry (I-I5). In studies in the oceanic regime, where the amount of mercury in a liter sample of open-ocean seawater can be as small as 10 ng (11,15,16,17), a. pre-concentration stage may be required. The lowered detection limits which accompany a preliminary concentration step are most desirable when the sample materials are rare or in limited quantities such as carefully collected open-ocean biota, open-ocean rain water, and deep-ocean seawater. [Pg.99]

UV—Vis = spectrophotometry FAAS = flame atomic absorption spectrometry FP = flame photometry Analytical range or detection limit given in original units. [Pg.253]

Atomic spectrometric techniques such as flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS), electrothermal AAS (ETAAS), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), and ICP-MS are used for the determination of elements, particularly metals. ICP-MS is the most sensitive, typically with microgram per liter detection limits and multielement capability but it has high start-up and operating costs. UV-visible spectrophotometry is also used for the determination of metal ions and anions such as nitrate and phosphate (usually by selective deriva-tization). It is a low cost and straightforward technique, and portable (handheld) instruments are available for field deployment. Flow injection (FI) provides a highly reproducible means of manipulating solution chemistry in a contamination free environment, and is often used for sample manipulation, e.g., derivatization, dilution, preconcentration and matrix removal, in conjunction with spectrometric detection. Electroanalytical techniques, particularly voltammetry and ion-selective electrodes (ISEs), are... [Pg.1097]

The combination of extraction-spectrophotometry and atomic absorption spectrometry after extraction of germanium tetrachloride with CCI4 brings about new advantages. A detection limit of 5 ng Ge/mL with a standard deviation of 6% was obtained [45]. [Pg.385]


See other pages where Atomic absorption spectrophotometry detection limits is mentioned: [Pg.137]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.776]    [Pg.1008]    [Pg.1562]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.582]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.345]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3370 ]




SEARCH



Absorption spectrophotometry

Atomic absorption detection limits

Atomic absorption spectrophotometry limitation

Atomic detection limits

Atomic limit

Detectable limit

Detection atomic

Detection limits

Detection limits, limitations

Detection-limiting

Spectrophotometry, atomic

© 2024 chempedia.info