Applied statistics confidence intervals

Milk Residue Decline Study at 50 mg/quarter. Twenty-six dairy cattle in midlactation and identified as mastitic in one or more quarters were given two intramammary infusions of pirlimycin HCl into all 4 quarters of the udder at a 24-hour interval at a dose rate of 50 mg/quarter (IX). Each cow was milked at 11-13 hour intervals and sub-samples taken for microbiological assay. The results are summarized in Table VIII. As observed in previous studies, the decline of the concentration of pirlimycin residue appears to be bi-phasic with a rapid initial depletion followed by a slower terminal elimination phase. Statistical analysis of the residue decline to a concentration below the calculated safe concentration of 0.4 ppm [following FDA guidelines of applying a confidence interval of 95% on the 99th percentile (75)] support a 36-hour milk discard interval (48-hour safe milk) for pirlimycin in the US. 

When high-school cross-country runners were exposed for 1 h to photochemical oxidants at 0.03-0.3 ppm, their performance decreased with increasing concentration. A statistical test for threshold values (regression using/ hockey stick functions) applied to these data gives a threshold estimate of 0.12 ppm, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.067-0.163 ppm. ... 

ML is the approach most commonly used to fit a distribution of a given type (Madgett 1998 Vose 2000). An advantage of ML estimation is that it is part of a broad statistical framework of likelihood-based statistical methodology, which provides statistical hypothesis tests (likelihood-ratio tests) and confidence intervals (Wald and profile likelihood intervals) as well as point estimates (Meeker and Escobar 1995). MLEs are invariant under parameter transformations (the MLE for some 1-to-l function of a parameter is obtained by applying the function to the untransformed parameter). In most situations of interest to risk assessors, MLEs are consistent and sufficient (a distribution for which sufficient statistics fewer than n do not exist, MLEs or otherwise, is the Weibull distribution, which is not an exponential family). When MLEs are biased, the bias ordinarily disappears asymptotically (as data accumulate). ML may or may not require numerical optimization skills (for optimization of the likelihood function), depending on the distributional model. 

An approach that is sometimes helpful, particularly for recent pesticide risk assessments, is to use the parameter values that result in best fit (in the sense of LS), comparing the fitted cdf to the cdf of the empirical distribution. In some cases, such as when fitting a log-normal distribution, formulae from linear regression can be used after transformations are applied to linearize the cdf. In other cases, the residual SS is minimized using numerical optimization, i.e., one uses nonlinear regression. This approach seems reasonable for point estimation. However, the statistical assumptions that would often be invoked to justify LS regression will not be met in this application. Therefore the use of any additional regression results (beyond the point estimates) is questionable. If there is a need to provide standard errors or confidence intervals for the estimates, bootstrap procedures are recommended. 

In analytical chemistry, the product is not spaghetti sauce, but, rather, raw data, treated data, and results. Raw data are individual values of a measured quantity, such as peak areas from a chromatogram or volumes from a buret. Treated data are concentrations or amounts found by applying a calibration procedure to the raw data. Results are what we ultimately report, such as the mean, standard deviation, and confidence interval, after applying statistics to treated data. 

The usual practice in these applications is to concentrate on model development and computation rather than on statistical aspects. In general, nonlinear regression should be applied only to problems in which there is a well-defined, clear association between the independent and dependent variables. The generalization of statistics to the associated confidence intervals for nonlinear coefficients is not well developed. 

Critical values for individual tests and confidence intervals are based on the null distribution of i /aL, that is, on the distribution of this statistic when all effects Pi are zero. Lenth proposed a /-distribution approximation to the null distribution, whereas Ye and Hamada (2000) obtained exact critical values by simulation of Pi /ai under the null distribution. From their tables of exact critical values, the upper 0.05 quantile of the null distribution of Pi /aL is CL = 2.156. On applying Lenth s method for the plasma etching experiment and using a = 0.05 for individual inferences, the minimum significant difference for each estimate is calculated to be cl x l = 60.24. Hence, the effects A, AB, and E are declared to be nonzero, based on individual 95% confidence intervals. 

There are important advantages in using adaptive robust procedures that strongly control the error rate. Strong control of the error rate provides the statistical rigor for assessing the believability of any assertions made about the significance of the main effects or interactions, whether confidence intervals or tests are applied. Use of a robust adaptive procedure allows the data to be used efficiently. 

A non-parametric test is the Reverse Arrangements Test, in which a statistic, called 2I, is calculated in order to assess the trend of a time series. The exact procedure of calculation as well as tables containing confidence intervals is described in Bendat Piersol (2000). If A is too big or too small compared to these standard values could mean there is a significant trend in the data, therefore the process should not be considered in steady state. The test is applied sequentially to data windows of a given... 

The statistical evaluation of bioequivalence studies should be based on confidence interval estimation rather than hypothesis testing (Metzler, 1988, 1989 Westlake, 1988). The 90% confidence interval approach, using 1 —2a (where a = 0.05), should be applied to the individual parameters of interest (i.e. the pharmacokinetic terms that estimate the rate and extent of drug absorption) (Martinez Berson, 1998). Graphical presentation of the plasma concentrationtime curves for averaged data (test vs. reference product) can be misleading, as the curves may appear to be similar even for drug products that are not bioequivalent. 

Statistics teaches that the deviation of data based on less than 30 measurements is not a normal distribution but Student s t-distribution. So it is suitable to express the binding constant K with 95% confidence interval calculated by applying by Student s t-distribution. Student s t-distribution includes the normal distribution. When the number of measurements is more than 30, Student s t-distribution and the normal distribution are practically the same. The actual function of Student s t-distribution is very complicated so that it is rarely used directly. A conventional way to apply Student s t-distribution is to pick up data from the critical value table of Student s t-distribution under consideration of degree of freedom , level of significance and measured data. It is troublesome to repeat this conventional way many times. Most spreadsheet software even for personal computers has the function of Student s t-distribution. Without any tedious work, namely, picking up data from the table, statistical treatment can be applied to experimental results based on Student s t-distribution with the aid of a computer. In Fig. 2.12, an example is shown. When the measurement data are input into the gray cells, answers can be obtained in the cell D18 and D19 instantaneously. 

If the terminal model adequately explains the copolymer composition, as is often the case, the terminal model is usually assumed to apply. Even where statistical tests show that the penultimate model does not provide a significantly better fit to experimental data than the tenninal model, this should not be construed as evidence that penultimate unit effects are unimportant. It is necessary to test for model discrimination, rather than merely for fit to a given model. In this context, it is important to remember that composition data are of very low power when it comes to model discrimination. For MMA-S copolymerization, even though experimental precision is high, the penultimate model confidence intervals are quite large 0.4[Pg.348]

We apply Equation 9.8 to estimate the parameter using the transformed model, so Xi = 1/Ti and yt Infej. To quantify the uncertainty, imagine we replicate the experiment. Figure 9.9 shows several more experiments. Each experiment that we perform allows us to estimate the slope and intercept. Then we can plot the distribution of parameters. Figure 9,10 shows the parameter estimates for 500 replicated experiments. Notice the points are clustering in an elliptical shape. We construct the 95% confidence interval from Equation 9.9. In this problem Up = 2 and a = 0.95, and we obtain from a statistics table (2,0,95) 5.99, so we plot... 

Statistical analysis using a one step non-linear regression metliod was applied in order to estimate kinetic parameters. Activation energies and rate constants estimated at the reference temperature of 40°C and corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported in Table I. 

Results of iodine determined by radiochemioal neutron activation analysis for control and AD subjects are summarized in this table. Applying statistical treatment to the data sets, mean, SD, confidence interval and significance (F-test, t-test) were calculated. Where a trend is indicated to be significant the p value is <0.05. Mean values cannot be given if we have only few data (parenthetic values) therefore, statistical treatment is not possible (-). n.s. there is no significant difference between the control and AD values. 

While only confidence intervals for the population mean have been discussed, confidence intervals can be computed for the population standard deviation. In addition, as described in the last example, confidence intervals can be applied to more than one sample. The construction of these intervals is discussed in most statistical textbooks including those cited at the end of this paper. 

Different regression coefficients are obtained if any other compound is chosen as the reference compound or if the classical Free Wilson model is applied. However, these values are only linearly shifted to the values of eq. 70 all statistical parameters are identical, with the only exception of the 95% confidence intervals [390, 391,410]. 

---