Statistics confidence

A method s detection limit is the smallest amount or concentration of analyte that can be detected with statistical confidence. The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (lUPAC) defines the detection limit as the smallest concentration or absolute amount of analyte that has a signal significantly larger than the signal arising from a reagent blank. Mathematically, the analyte s signal at the detection limit, (Sa)dl, is... 

Da.ta. Ana.lysls. First, the raw data must be converted to concentrations over an appropriate time span. When sample periods do not correspond to the averaging time of the exposure limit, some assumptions must be made about unsampled periods. It may be necessary to test the impact of various assumptions on the final decision. Next, some test statistics (confidence limit, etc) (Fig. 3) are calculated and compared to a test criteria to make an inference about a hypotheses. 

Considerations of turn around time for the analysis, the statistical confidence level and the specificity required also play a part in the decision. Even a so called quick and dirty method can become quantitative to an acceptable extent once conditions are standardized. 

The proteins of high abundance are often identified by multiple peptides and high statistical confidence. On the contrary, many medium and low abundant proteins are typically identified by only a single peptide. This is a direct result of the semirandom nature of the DDA algorithm (Liu et al., 2004), as discussed above. In addition, these peptide hits often cannot be confirmed by subsequent DDA experiments conducted... 

The limit of detection (LoD) has already been mentioned in Section 4.3.1. This is the minimum concentration of analyte that can be detected with statistical confidence, based on the concept of an adequately low risk of failure to detect a determinand. Only one value is indicated in Figure 4.9 but there are many ways of estimating the value of the LoD and the choice depends on how well the level needs to be defined. It is determined by repeat analysis of a blank test portion or a test portion containing a very small amount of analyte. A measured signal of three times the standard deviation of the blank signal (3sbi) is unlikely to happen by chance and is commonly taken as an approximate estimation of the LoD. This approach is usually adequate if all of the analytical results are well above this value. The value of Sbi used should be the standard deviation of the results obtained from a large number of batches of blank or low-level spike solutions. In addition, the approximation only applies to results that are normally distributed and are quoted with a level of confidence of 95%. 

Fig. 6.4. Statistical confidence level associated with the electric events synchronized with the laser pulses during a thunderstorm. The color scale is transparent below 98% (i.e., for error risks above 2%), leaving the topographical background uncovered. Arrowhead location of the laser-induced plasma channel Arrow tail laser emitter. Topographic background courtesy of US Geological Survey [31]...

Influent uncertainty Closely related to the preceding point is the fact that the composition of the influent is highly influenced by constraints, which may vary in a random manner depending on human industrial or environmental activities [72]. Again, without suitable on-line sensors to measure these variations, only estimates based on statistical confidence intervals may be used in some cases. 

Because it is derived from the upper confidence bound on risk, the BMD is actually the lower confidence bound on the dose corresponding to a 10% risk. Statistical confidence bounds are used to account for expected variability in observed data. Their use adds an element of additional caution to the extrapolation process. See later. 

Hahn, G.J. (1982a), Demonstrating Performance with High Statistical Confidence , CHEMTECH, 12, 286-289. 

The t value is the number of standard deviations that the single value differs from the mean value. This t value is then compared to the critical t value obtained from a t-table, given a desired statistical confidence (i.e., 90%, 95%, or 99% confidence) and the number of degrees of freedom (typically iV-1), to assess whether the value is statistically different from the other values in the series. In chemometrics, the t test can be useful for evaluating outliers in data sets. 

As the /statistic deviates further from one, there is a greater probability that the two standard deviations are different. To quantitate this probability, one needs to consult an f-table that provides the critical values off as a function of the degrees of freedom for the two distributions (typically A - 1 for each of the data series), and the desired statistical confidence (90%, 95%, 99%, etc.). 

The accuracy of data obtained by these methods must be analyzed very carefully to determine the statistical confidence of rate parameters ttij, E, and ko obtained. One must have data over a sufficient range of Ct, t, and T for accurate values, and data should be analyzed by methods such as least-squares analysis to assess its accuracy. 

The probability that this overall effect is statistically significant The statistical confidence limits on the overall effect... 

If a study has negative findings, it should be carefully evaluated with respect to, for example, the power of the study, its concordance or discordance with other related studies, and differences or similarities in study design or end-points with related studies. Results of different studies can be evaluated by comparing statistical confidence intervals. Studies with lower power will tend to yield wider confidence intervals the magnitude of the risks must be considered. Studies with similar risks are important even if statistical significance is not present in all studies. 

The minimum content of the analyte in the test portion that can be quantitatively determined with a reasonable statistical confidence when applying the analytical procedure. 

APPENDIX VIII Values of t for Analysis of Statistical Confidence Limits 453... 

The specification of repeatability and reproducibility intervals, without specification of a statistical confidence level, weakens the precision and accuracy... 

An example of a recovery control chart is shown in Figure 4.7. The mean recovery of individual measurements is represented by the centreline. The upper warning limit (UWL) and the lower warning limit (LWL) are calculated as plus/minus two standard deviations (mean recovery + 2s) and correspond to a statistical confidence interval of 95 percent. The upper control limit (UCL) and the lower control limit (LCL) are calculated as plus/minus three standard deviations (mean recovery 3s), and represent a statistical confidence interval of 99 percent. Control limits vary from laboratory to laboratory as they depend on the analytical procedure and the skill of the analysts. 

The growth in the water buoyancy of the summer surface layer of the Black Sea from the end of the 1970s that was caused by the temperature increase and the salinity decrease provided a greater thermal insulation of the CIL expressed in a distinct drop in its minimal temperature (see Fig. 13), which is statistically significant with respect to both linear and quadratic trends in the east and west of the Black Sea. In the surface layer only in the western part of the Black Sea the quadratic trend of the surface temperatures was statistically confident. 

While these results appear to be interesting, the proviso should be emphasized that the techniques used in obtaining data on spleen mass, blood volume, and [Hb] were not always the same in all studies and that in consequence significant variation in signal/noise ratios might well be anticipated. This situation would tend to decrease rather than increase the statistical confidence levels. The fact that, despite these limitations, increased spleen size, blood volume,... 

Statistical confidence in demonstration of compliance (e.g., 95% confidence that failure occurs for more than 5% of the time)... 

The statistical confidence with which noncompliance is to be demonstrated before remedial action is taken in response to a failure. 

---