Analytical Measuring Systems

With this background infonnation on the inverse methods, it is instructive to examine the calculations for the inverse model in more detail. In Equation 5-23, the key to the model-building step is the inversion of the matrix CR ). This is a squire matrix with number of rows and columns equal to the number of measurement variables (nvars). From theory, a number of independent samples in the calibration set greater than or equal to nvars is needed in order to invert this matrix. For most analytical measurement systems, nvars (e.g., number of wavelengths) is greater than the number of independent samples and therefore RTr cannot be directly inverted. However, with a transformation, calculating she pseudo-inverse of R (R is possible. How this transformation is accomplished distinguishes the different inverse methods. 

Analytical Measuring Systems, London Road, Pampisford, Cambridge, Cambs. CB2 4EF, England (01223)836001 Analysette (see Fritsch)... 

Certified reference materials are used to provide reference values to facilitate the development and validation of analytical methods, and for the calibration, verification, and quality control of analytical measurement systems. 

Sources of Error. pH electrodes are subject to fewer iaterfereaces and other types of error than most potentiometric ionic-activity sensors, ie, ion-selective electrodes (see Electro analytical techniques). However, pH electrodes must be used with an awareness of their particular response characteristics, as weU as the potential sources of error that may affect other components of the measurement system, especially the reference electrode. Several common causes of measurement problems are electrode iaterferences and/or fouling of the pH sensor, sample matrix effects, reference electrode iastabiHty, and improper caHbration of the measurement system (12). 

Design considerations and costs of the catalyst, hardware, and a fume control system are direcdy proportional to the oven exhaust volume. The size of the catalyst bed often ranges from 1.0 m at 0°C and 101 kPa per 1000 m /min of exhaust, to 2 m for 1000 m /min of exhaust. Catalyst performance at a number of can plant installations has been enhanced by proper maintenance. Annual analytical measurements show reduction of solvent hydrocarbons to be in excess of 90% for 3—6 years, the equivalent of 12,000 to 30,000 operating hours. When propane was the only available fuel, the catalyst cost was recovered by fuel savings (vs thermal incineration prior to the catalyst retrofit) in two to three months. In numerous cases the fuel savings paid for the catalyst in 6 to 12 months. 

The minimum detectable limit depends on the analytical range, span, and signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement system. For a well-designed system, the minimum detectable limit should be less than 2 percent of the span. 

Electron spectroscopic techniques require vacuums of the order of 10 Pa for their operation. This requirement arises from the extreme surface-specificity of these techniques, mentioned above. With sampling depths of only a few atomic layers, and elemental sensitivities down to 10 atom layers (i. e., one atom of a particular element in 10 other atoms in an atomic layer), the techniques are clearly very sensitive to surface contamination, most of which comes from the residual gases in the vacuum system. According to gas kinetic theory, to have enough time to make a surface-analytical measurement on a surface that has just been prepared or exposed, before contamination from the gas phase interferes, the base pressure should be 10 Pa or lower, that is, in the region of ultrahigh vacuum (UHV). 

Definition and Uses of Standards. In the context of this paper, the term "standard" denotes a well-characterized material for which a physical parameter or concentration of chemical constituent has been determined with a known precision and accuracy. These standards can be used to check or determine (a) instrumental parameters such as wavelength accuracy, detection-system spectral responsivity, and stability (b) the instrument response to specific fluorescent species and (c) the accuracy of measurements made by specific Instruments or measurement procedures (assess whether the analytical measurement process is in statistical control and whether it exhibits bias). Once the luminescence instrumentation has been calibrated, it can be used to measure the luminescence characteristics of chemical systems, including corrected excitation and emission spectra, quantum yields, decay times, emission anisotropies, energy transfer, and, with appropriate standards, the concentrations of chemical constituents in complex S2unples. 

It should be recognized that, in some cases, it is not difficult to set up a traceable measurement system. The best examples of this are in physical metrology where traceability is often based on direct measurements of the SI units. There is also general agreement that a similar SI fink is highly desirable in the case of chemical measurements, but, for a variety of reasons, direct chemical traceability is difficult to achieve in most of the analytical chemistry applications. Only a very few analytical chemistry procedures exhibit a direct measurement capability that allows the set-up of a traceable measurement pathway such as in physical metrology measurements most of these procedures have been accepted as primary methods if carried out under certain constraints (CCQM 1998). 

The UK Government has, for more than six years, funded the Valid Analytical Measurement (VAM) Programme, which is aimed at improving the quality and comparability of analytical measurements. The work undertaken within VAM is key to the underpinning of a modern physico-chemical and biochemical National Measurement System, By disseminating the activities of VAM across international boundaries and linking with other national measurement system VAM also aims to ensure the comparability of data worldwide. Thus VAM provides an infrastructure under which reliable measurements can be made for trade, regulation and health and safety provision. 

The majority of analytical methods are based on inelastic interactions. In contrast to elastic interactions, in case of inelastic interactions both the energy of the measuring system, Ein, and the intrinsic energy of the constituents of the measuring sample, E0, will be changed in such a way that the following condition is fulfilled ... 

Therefore, signal functions y(z) always represent a convolution of the true signal function y z)trUe and the characteristic function of the analytical instrument h(z) which characterizes all the insufficiencies of the measuring system ... 

The analytical process is a procedure of gaining information. At first, samples contain only latent information on the composition and structure, namely by their intrinsic properties (Malissa [1984] Eckschlager and Danzer [1994]). By interactions between the sample and the measuring system this information is transformed step by step into signals, measured results and useful chemical information. 

Precision of a measuring system and with it also of signals and signal functions obtained by instrumental analytical methods, is characterized by the signal-to-noise ratio. 

On the other hand, specificity refers to single component analysis and means that the one individual analyte can be undisturbedly measured in a real sample by a specific reagent, a particular sensor or a comparable measuring system (e.g., measurement of emitted or absorbed radiation at a fixed wavelength). 

Property of an analytical system to produce a response of an observation- or measuring system. Rousing effect of an analyte that can be characterized qualitatively and quantitatively. 

---