A Concise Conclusion

A Drug Summary Table is placed at the conclusion of most chapters these provide a concise recapitulation of the most important drugs... 

Pepper has briefly reported on their activity vis-a-vis styrene, but has never published a full account of his investigation Asami and Tokura used CISO3H in sulphur dioxide for the polymerisation of the same monomer and found it to be a very efficient initiator. Recently, Masuda et al. published a concise study of the polymerisaticMi of styrene by both acids in various solvents. As expected, the chloro derivative was found to be a weaker promoter than the fluorosulphonic acid. Both systems gave asymptotic yields indicating that fast initiation was followed by an important termination reaction. Incorporation of chlorine into the polystyrenes prepared with chlorosulphonic acid (but absence of sulphur) suggested that this acid decomposes in the polymerisation process (hydrolysis ). On the whole, the limited amount of evidence obtained in this study does not allow any mechanistic conclusion. 

Bianchi et al. present a concise pictorial summary of the QTAIM characterisation and classification of bonding interactions in the conclusion of their paper about the electron density of Mn2(CO)io [114]. Figure 2 is an adaptation (with modifications) of their scheme. The classification is to be taken as a general guide since exceptions and special cases do arise as one attempts to draw a correspondence between classical bonding descriptors (ionic, covalent, etc.) and quantum mechanical quantities. 

A really good way to close is with a concise, powerful line. Never say in conclusion unless you mean it. The conclusion should round out the speech, tie together the main points, focus the listeners attention on the... 

Conclusions that extrapolate beyond the range of available data are as inappropriate in scientific publications as they are in regulatory documents and marketing materials. Omissions of details in methods and results pursuant to a concise presentation will always be subjective, and there is a close link between the appropriateness of this subjectivity and the integrity of the pharmaceutical physician. 

A concise but informative summary (double-spaced) must conclude the text of each manuscript it should summarize the significant content and major conclusions presented. It must not be longer than two 8V2 X 11-inch pages of doublespaced typing. As a summary, it should be more informative than the usual abstract. 

This section of the report is the most important individual section. The objective of the abstract is to provide the reader with a concise, overall statement of the high points of the report. Normally, the abstract should be no more than one written page. More than any other section of the report, the abstract should be prepared in consideration of the reader and the piupose of the own report. A reasonable assessment of the abstract will be, therefore, to read it from the reader s point of view and determine if is sufficiently clear and concise and conveys the appropriate information on the purpose, scope, and extent of the report. A good abstract will include a brief statement of the objectives of the study, experiment, or design, and results in the form on concise conclusions and/or recommendations for further work. Often, other information, such as important assumptions, alternatives analyzed, or procediues will be included depending on the purpose of the report and the reader s profile. 

The theoretical results are reasonably accurate and consistent between different calculations. ET takes place in single jumps, although a slight inaccuracy of the calculation is sufficient to allow multiple jumps in some cases. The most concise conclusion is that conductivity in DNA is caused by single leaps between the bases in the DNA strand, approximately, as in graphite, in the perpendicular direction. 

There are very many investigations in the literature concerning the evaluation of different metals and associated organic ligands in hydroformylation. In 2013, Franke and Seller [1] provided a concise summary about the applicability of alternative metals in hydroformylation. In the same year, another survey was assembled by a joint French/Italian cooperation [2]. In order to avoid a full repetition, only some basic conclusions will be mentioned here, which are not in the focus of the reviews cited above. 

No concise conclusion can yet be drawn r arding the effect of PEF pretreatment on product quahty after drying, as the amount of data currently available is very limited. Shrinka was reduced, and rehydration ability improved, for PEF-pretreated samples in most cases, in addition to a visually better quahty. However, losses of vitamin C during osmotic dehydration were more pronounced for PEF-pretreated samples than for untreated samples. Modifications of the cell stmcture by PEF showed effects not only on water removal but also on the dislocation of dissolved solids, as noted by the changes in sugar distribution in the case of hot-air drying of apple cubes. 

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the numerical flow solver and the S3mthetic turbulence generation method are described. Subsequently, in Sections the flow problems, i.e., the flat-plate flows are introduced. Section4 contains the results. That is, solutions of the zonal method are compared with DNS and experimental findings. Finally, results for the zonal RANS-LES method are presented for a transonic airfoil flow and some concise conclusions are drawn. 

The use of modelling on a project is not a prerequisite for a successful conclusion of the undertaking, but it supports efficient, concise and stmctuied knowledge gathering, structuring of the argument, and enables quantified support to the decision-making process. 

The abstract is a concise summary of the content and purpose of the main report. Its purpose is to provide enough information to allow the reader to decide whether or not to obtain and read the complete report. A descriptive abstract describes what the full report contains but does not give the findings of the report. An informative abstract briefly describes study methodology and states major conclusions and recommendations. Many clients, including many... 

To be effective, the toxicology evaluation must meet several criteria it must be (1) thorough, (2) clear and concise, (3) in a form appropriate to its target audience, and (4) include a conclusion or recommendation. 

The major purpose of the title is to inform readers about the specific content of the work, ideally identifying both what was studied and how it was studied. The major purpose of an abstract is to summarize, in one clear and concise paragraph, the purpose, experimental approach, principal results, and major conclusions of the work. In most journals, the abstract includes only text in some journals (e.g.. The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Organic Letters), the abstract also includes a graphic. Importantly, both the abstract and title must be able to stand on their own. This is because these two sections (and only these two sections) are reprinted by abstracting services (e.g.. Chemical Abstracts Service, or CAS) in separate documents for literature searches. Also, many chemists read titles and abstracts to obtain a quick overview of the journal s contents but do not read the articles in full. 

Enter all your observations of the experimental work and conclusions in a laboratory notebook that is a document reflecting all your work. Write your surname, initials, class number and the name of the course on the cover or first page of the notebook. Make all entries only in ink, concisely, accurately, and legibly, directly after performing an experiment. The writeup must contain the following information ... 

Conclusions. The conclusions section simply captures the overall results of the activity. This section is typically completed by the executor or by someone who is technically capable of reviewing the effort and rendering conclusions. It should be concise and to the point, since the data are attached. What exactly do the data tell the audience Was the activity a success If not, why not These are some of the questions that should be answered in the conclusions. 

Depending on the project objectives and contractual conditions, DQARs may be lengthy and elaborate or short and concise. Important is that a DQAR is not an enumeration of field and laboratory deficiencies and that it formulates the DQA conclusions on the data validity and relevancy in the context of the intended use of the data. 

The purpose of this paper is to describe steady flow of water and transport of solutes across single and series arrays of arbitrary numbers of membranes. Differential forms of the flow and transport equations are used as the point of departure and from these the incremental forms are derived. This theory allows one to state concisely some general properties of series arrays of membranes, with regard to nonlinearity, polarity, and changes of the ordering of individual membranes. This study is motivated by the problems of flow of water and transport of solutes in clay soils [1] and of simultaneous uptake of water and solutes by plant roots [2], Some of the conclusions are generalizations of results obtained earlier for special cases see [3] for a detailed evaluation of the literature. 

The final section in the process is describing the conclusions, implications, and recommendations that the team reached after examining the results. Since this is the bottom line of the process, it is important that this section be understandable to those outside the CQI team. This section should concisely explain the conclusions and detail the actions that need to take place. The CQI process is iterative thus the team s recommendations for this CQI cycle and for the next CQI cycle m ust be included (Leape et al., 1998c). This will be good news to pharmacist Pat. Because CQI is a continuous improvement process, an understanding of the iterative nature of the process will take the pressure off him to fix all pharmacy system problems at once. 

---