Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

X electron

The need for such large CSF expansions should not be surprising considering (i) that each electron pair requires at least two CSFs to fomi polarized orbital pairs, (ii) there are of the order of N N - 1 )/2 = X electron pairs for N electrons, hence (iii) the number of temis in the Cl wavefiinction scales as 1. For a molecule containing ten electrons, there could be 2 =3.5x10 temis in the Cl expansion. This may be an overestimate of the number of CSFs needed, but it demonstrates how rapidly the number of CSFs can grow with the number of electrons. [Pg.2176]

Spin orbitals arc grouped in pairs for an KHF ealetilation, Haeti mem her of ih e pair dilTcrs in its spin function (one alpha and one beta), hilt both must share the same space function. For X electrons, X/2 different in olecu lar orbitals (space function s larc doubly occupied, with one alpha (spin up) and one beta (spin down) electron forming a pair. [Pg.37]

The general contribution for a metal with v valence electrons and exopolyhedral ligands donating x electrons is t + a — 12 framework electrons. See text. [Pg.231]

Figure 9-22. Energy diagram ol a metal/ scmiconductor/meta Schottky barrier (0... workfunction, x,. electron affinity, /,... ionization potential, . ..bandgap, W... depletion width). Figure 9-22. Energy diagram ol a metal/ scmiconductor/meta Schottky barrier (0... workfunction, x,. electron affinity, /,... ionization potential, . ..bandgap, W... depletion width).
Figure 9-19. Bund diagram of LPPP with hole traps and gold electrodes with Va<- vacuum level. Ec conduction band, Eva valence band. E, Fermi level. . baudgup energy. and , " trap depths. ,( ) trap distribution, X electron affmity, and All work function of the gold electrodes. Figure 9-19. Bund diagram of LPPP with hole traps and gold electrodes with Va<- vacuum level. Ec conduction band, Eva valence band. E, Fermi level. . baudgup energy. and , " trap depths. ,( ) trap distribution, X electron affmity, and <J>All work function of the gold electrodes.
X = electron-donating group Y = electron-withdrawing group... [Pg.208]

The geometrical parameters found for these four conformations are gathered in Table 7. It is seen that the carbon atom of the preferred conformations exhibits an sp hybridization because of the destabilization of the x electronic system by the x antibonding orbital, whereas the carbon atom of the planar conformations shows mostly an sp one. [Pg.186]

The CO-X bond breaking is the result of an electrophilic attack (on the carbonyl oxygen atom, hence the catalytic role of acids in these rupture reactions) or a nucleophilic one (on the carbonyl carbon atom whose positive property is due to the X electron-withdrawing property). The dangers of this type of reaction come from its speed and high exothermicity and/or instability of the products obtained in some cases. The accidents that are described below can make one believe that acid anhydrides in general and acetic anhydride in particular represent greater risks than acid chlorides since they constitute the accident factor of almost all accidents described. This is obviously related to their frequent use in synthesis rather than acid chlorides, that are rarely used. [Pg.327]

Fig. 24. Ru34 and Ir4/binding energies for a RuxIrl x alloy electrode after polarizaition at 1.7 V for 5 min in 0.5 molL-1 H2S04 as a function of composition x. Electron emission angle was 90° for Ru34 and 20 for Ir4/... Fig. 24. Ru34 and Ir4/binding energies for a RuxIrl x alloy electrode after polarizaition at 1.7 V for 5 min in 0.5 molL-1 H2S04 as a function of composition x. Electron emission angle was 90° for Ru34 and 20 for Ir4/...
As was shown in the preceding discussion (see also Sections VIII and IX), the rovibronic wave functions for a homonuclear diatomic molecule under the permutation of identical nuclei are symmetric for even J rotational quantum numbers in + and Xu electronic states antisymmetric for odd J values in + and electronic states symmetric for odd J values in Xj and X+ electronic states and antisymmetric for even J values in X and X+ electronic states. Note that the vibrational ground state is symmetric under permutation of the two nuclei. The most restrictive result arises therefore when the nuclear spin quantum number of the individual nuclei is 0. In this case, the nuclear spin function is always symmetric with respect to interchange of the identical nuclei, and hence only totally symmetric rovibronic states are allowed since the total wave function must be symmetric for bosonic systems. For example, the 12C nucleus has zero nuclear spin, and hence the rotational levels with odd values of J do not exist for the ground electronic state ( X+) of 12C2. [Pg.683]

Some substituents induce remarkably different electronic behaviors on the same aromatic system (8). Let us consider, for example, the actions of substituents on an aromatic electron system. Some substituents have a tendency to enrich their electronic population (acceptors), while others will give away some of it (donors). Traditionaly, quantum chemists used to distinguish between long range (mesomeric) effects, mainly u in nature, and short range (inductive) effects, mainly a. The nonlinear behavior of a monosubstituted molecule can be accounted for in terms of the x electron dipole moment. Examples of donor and acceptor substituents can be seen on figure 1. [Pg.84]

Generally, the transparency of a molecular x electron system narrows with increasing conjugation (bathochromic effect) while its nonlinear efficiency increases. The urea molecule is a small conjugated molecule transparent up to 2000 A with a low (3 value 1.3 10-3 e.s.u. (10). For 4-nitro 4 -dimethylaminostilbene the... [Pg.84]

R - H, alkyl, EWG R - alkyl, aryl R" - H, alkyl, aryl X - electron donating group... [Pg.463]

For a general closed-shell AX , species, the Lewis-type assumption of a shared A X electron-pair bond for each coordinated monovalent atom X nominally requires m orbitals on A to accommodate the 2m bonding electrons, plus additional orbitals for any nonbonded pairs. Thus, for m bonds and t lone pairs, apparent octet-rule violations occur whenever... [Pg.276]

X. Electron Tomography Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy Imaging. 212... [Pg.194]

Figure 2.11 Lewis structure of the covalent hydrogen molecule in X Electrons which electrons are shared... Figure 2.11 Lewis structure of the covalent hydrogen molecule in X Electrons which electrons are shared...
Fig. 6-20. Charge distribution profile across an interface between metal and vacuum (MAO (a) ionic pseudo-potential in metal, (b) diffuse electron tailing away from the jellium metal edge, (c) excess charge profile. n(x) s electron density at distance x = electron density in metal x, = effective image plane On = differential excess charge On = 0 corresponds to the zero charge interface. Fig. 6-20. Charge distribution profile across an interface between metal and vacuum (MAO (a) ionic pseudo-potential in metal, (b) diffuse electron tailing away from the jellium metal edge, (c) excess charge profile. n(x) s electron density at distance x = electron density in metal x, = effective image plane On = differential excess charge On = 0 corresponds to the zero charge interface.
Timothy J. Mason, John Philip Lorimer Copyright 2002 Wdey-VCH Verlag GmbH Co. KGaA ISBNs 3-527-30205-0 (Hardback) 3-527-60054-X (Electronic)... [Pg.1]


See other pages where X electron is mentioned: [Pg.384]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.820]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.942]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.101]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.237 ]




SEARCH



Auger electron and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy

Cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography

Diffraction of electrons, neutrons and X-rays

Diffraction of x-rays and electrons

Diffraction with electrons, X-rays, and atoms

ELECTRON DISPERSIVE X-RAY

ELECTRON DISPERSIVE X-RAY ANALYSIS

Electron and X-Ray Diffraction Studies

Electron and X-Ray Diffraction Studies of 1,2,3,5-Dithiadiazolyl Radicals

Electron and x-ray spectroscopy

Electron density map, from X-ray

Electron dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

Electron microprobe X-ray emission

Electron microprobe X-ray emission spectrometry

Electron probe X-ray

Electron probe X-ray microanalysis

Electron probe X-ray microanalysis (EPXMA

Electron probe x-ray microanalysis EPMA)

Electron-Density Distributions Determined by X-Ray Diffraction Methods

Electron-induced X-ray emission

Energy Dispersive X-Ray Microanalysis in the Electron Microscope

Results of X-ray and electron diffraction studies

Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive analysis using X-rays

Scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

Scanning electron microscopy-X-ray

Scanning electron microscopy-X-ray microanalysis

Scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM

Scattering of X-Rays by an Electron

Shell electrons, X-rays

The Electronic Structure-Based Explicit Polarization (X-Pol) Potential

Transmission electron microscopy X-ray diffraction

X -electron transfer

X band, electron spin resonance

X-Ray Fluorescence and Auger-Electron Emission

X-Ray microanalysis, electron

X-electron densities

X-ray Emission and (Photo)Electron Spectroscopies

X-ray and electron microscopic analyses

X-ray and the Electronic Density

X-ray diffraction difference electron density map

X-ray diffraction electron density map

X-ray diffraction electron microscopy

X-ray electron

X-ray electron spectroscopy

X-ray excited auger electron

X-ray excited auger electron spectroscopy

X-ray fluorescence electronics

X-ray free electron lasers

X-ray microanalysis and analytical electron microscopy

X-ray microanalysis with the electron probe

X-ray photo electron spectroscopy

X-ray photo electron spectroscopy (XPS

X-ray photoemission electron microscopy

X-ray spectroscopy in the electron microscope

© 2024 chempedia.info