Working electrodes conditioning potential

An outstanding challenge is to identify a set of redox couples that could be used as internal references for a wide range of electrolytes, solvents and working electrode conditions. Calculated redox potentials would then be reported as follows ... 

Potentiostatic conditions are realized with electronic potentiostats. The potential of the working electrode is monitored continuously with the aid of a reference electrode. When the potential departs from a set value, the potentiostat will adjust the current flow in the cell automatically so as to restore the original value of potential. Important characteristics of potentiostats are their rise time and the maximum currents which they can deliver to the cell. Modem high-quality potentiostats have rise times of 10 to 10 s. 

For this reason and following a suggestion of M. I. Temkin (1948), another conventional parameter is used in electrochemistry [i.e., the real activation energy described by Eq. (14.2)], not at constant potential but at constant polarization of the electrode. These conditions are readily realized in the measurements (an electrode at zero current and the working electrode can be kept at the same temperature), and the real activation energy can be measured. 

However, under working conditions, with a current density j, the cell voltage E(j) decreases greatly as the result of three limiting factors the charge transfer overpotentials r]a,act and Pc,act at the two electrodes due to slow kinetics of the electrochemical processes (p, is defined as the difference between the working electrode potential ( j), and the equilibrium potential eq,i). the ohmic drop Rf. j, with the ohmic resistance of the electrolyte and interface, and the mass transfer limitations for reactants and products. The cell voltage can thus be expressed as... 

Anson and co-workers have shown that two Co ions were not necessary for four-electron 02 reduction.266 The mew-substituted complex porphyrin Co(TPyP) (42) complex bears four active pyridyl donors which readily react with four equivalents of [Ru(NH3)5(OH2)]2+ to produce the tetra-ruthenated derivative. The four Ru centers are sufficiently remote that their RuIII/n potentials coincide. Under steady state conditions [Co(TPyP)] Ru(NH3)5 4]8+ (43) adsorbed onto a pyrolytic graphite working electrode catalyzes the reduction of dioxygen (Figure 6). 

Alternatively, one may control the electrode potential and monitor the current. This potentiodynamic approach is relatively easy to accomplish by use of a constant-voltage source if the counterelectrode also functions as the reference electrode. As indicated in the previous section, this may lead to various undesirable effects if a sizable ohmic potential drop exists between the electrodes, or if the overpotential of the counterelectrode is strongly dependent on current. The potential of the working electrode can be controlled instead with respect to a separate reference electrode by using a potentiostat. The electrode potential may be varied in small increments or continuously. It is also possible to impose the limiting-current condition instantaneously by applying a potential step. 

To determine the optimum working electrode potential for a certain analysis it is necessary to know how detector response (electrolysis current) is related to the working electrode potential (voltage). Such a relationship (voltammogram) provides practically all information necessary to determine the optimum detection potential for a certain analyte under given chromatographic conditions. 

To obtain the voltammogram for an electro-active substance X under given chromatographic conditions the peak heights of X (electrolysis current of X) are plotted versus corresponding working electrode potentials. 

Additionally, other reference electrodes are used which are easier to maintain at standard conditions. These include the silver/silver chloride electrode and the saturated calomel electrode (SCE). The voltage difference between the working electrode and the reference electrode is proportional to the electrochemical potential difference between them. This is written... 

Since we are interested in controlling accurately the potential of the working electrode (in order to condition the rate of the electron transfer between this electrode and the electroactive species), we must work on the difference of potential between the two electrodes. It is clear, however, that changing the applied potential between the two electrodes causes unpredictable variations in the potential of either the working electrode, or the counter electrode, or in the iR drop. This implies that it... 

Voltammetric techniques involve perturbing the initial zero-current condition of an electrochemical cell by imposing a change in potential to the working electrode and observing the fate of the generated current as... 

In order to understand the meaning of such a sentence one must consider that the starting potential for a cyclic voltammetric scan must be selected on the basis of the zero-current condition, or to start from a potential value at which no electron transfer occurs at the working electrode. Even if one was wrong in the choice of the starting potential, i.e. one could have selected a potential at which an electrode process is taking place, it is very unlikely that one can realize it, in that the... 

To measure the number of electrons involved in such a cathodic process one prepares, directly in the electrolysis cell (see Chapter 3, Section 2.2), a solution of known concentration of the substance of interest and applies under stirring (in order to accelerate the mass transport to the electrode) a potential slightly more negative (by about 0.2 V) with respect to the peak potential of the reduction process. In this case, for example, Ew -0.9 V (Ew representing the working potential). In this way one is working under diffusion conditions. Obviously, in the case of oxidation processes, one must apply potentials which are slightly more positive than the peak potential of the oxidation process. 

In principle, a further inexpensive method is to work at constant cell voltage. But here the potentials of the working and of the counter electrode, and all voltage drops of the electrolytes and of the cell separator are included (see Fig. 2). Thus, in most cases, clearly defined conditions at the working electrode cannot be adjusted using this operation mode (nevertheless, because of its uncomplicated realization, it is applied in most technical electrolyses to achieve approximately the desired cell current). 

Comparisons of electrochemical results obtained from different laboratories are complicated by differing preferences for solvents, electrolytes, working electrode surfaces and, most significantly, reference electrodes. Rather than relating the data to a common electrochemical reference, we cite the data as given in the original literature together with an indication of the conditions employed. Furthermore, we have included the formal electrode potential of any internal standard (typically ferrocene or decamethylferrocene) used in the study where available. 

The overall rate of an electrochemical reaction is measured by the current flow through the cell. In order to make valid comparisons between different electrode systems, this current is expressed as cunent density,/, the current per unit area of electrode surface. Tire current density that can be achieved in an electrochemical cell is dependent on many factors. The rate constant of the initial electron transfer step depends on the working electrode potential, Tlie concentration of the substrate maintained at the electrode surface depends on the diffusion coefficient, which is temperature dependent, and the thickness of the diffusion layer, which depends on the stirring rate. Under experimental conditions, current density is dependent on substrate concentration, stirring rate, temperature and electrode potential. 

On a large scale, it is more difficult to maintain constant electrode potential and conditions of constant current are employed. Under these conditions, as the concentration of the substrate falls, the voltage across the cell rises in order to maintain the imposed reaction rate at the electrode surface. This causes a drop in current efficiency towards the end of the reaction, since as the working electrode potential rises, either oxygen or hydrogen evolution becomes significant. 

Another form of this definition [equation (3.6.15)] has sparked much debate in the scientific community [121-124]. In this approach Vapp (or Vbias) is taken as the absolute value of the difference between the potential at the working electrode measured with respect to a reference electrode (Vmeas) and the open circuit potential (Voc) measured with respect to the same reference electrode under identical conditions (in the same electrolyte solution and under the same illumination). In the case of a semiconductor photoanode where oxygen evolution takes place the efficiency is calculated as ... 

Ip is the photocurrent density in mA cm, AE the potential difference between working electrode and counter electrode under illumination minus the potential difference between the same electrodes without illumination (dark). That is, AE is the photovoltage with dark voltage subtracted from it. This equation is misleading and has no thermodynamics basis. AE does not necessarily represent the sample behavior but it depends upon the experimental conditions. Furthermore the hydrogen produced at current Ip can yield a power output higher than Ip AE. 

---