Work activity risk assessment

Risk and risk assessment are one of the fundamental ways safety and unsafety is managed on UK construction sites, and are prescribed by law. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations (1999) require that risks associated with any work activity are assessed before work starts. Risk assessments form the basis of many Health and Safety Regulations, and a standardised format and prescribed approach to the process often forms part of the safety management system toolkit in the establishment of safe systems of work. ... 

It is important to remember that unexpected benefits may arise from integration. You should actively look for these benefits and document them. It may be possible to improve some of these benefits by small modifications to the plan or integration framework. Such additional work should be undertaken only with the appropriate approvals. Never the less, if any benefits would only be achieved with the integration project, you should include them in your overall statement of benefits. An example of this might be the better allocation of capital to risk reduction efforts when an integrated risk assessment is done-addressing several different types of risk. 

You must assess risks to the health and safety of anyone who may be affected by your work activities, so that you can weigh up whether you have done enough or need to do more to comply with the law -see Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. 

These are Just some examples of key areas this is not an exhaustive list. Look around your workplace to identify other risk areas. If any risks apply to your work activities, you will need to do risk assessments to check that you have removed or reduced the risk. 

Exposure assessments have become an essential element of contemporary risk assessment (NAS/NRC, 1983). The primary purpose of exposure assessment is to qualitatively and/or quantitatively determine exposure and absorbed dose associated with a particular use practice or human activity. Contemporary exposure assessors and risk managers place a high premium on accurate data obtained by monitoring chemical exposure scenarios and critical human activities or work tasks. 

Atmospheric releases of flammable gases such as hydrogen may lead to major fires with extensive effects on the surroundings. In activities where hazards are associated with cloud fires, there is the need of societal risk assessment that involves the estimation of hazardous zones due to the resulting thermal radiation. However, till now only limited work has been done on modeling the effects of flash fires, in a way that available techniques may be judged insufficient [47],... 

In conclusion, the authors of the cited studies all agree that further research into environmental risk assessment of hospital effluents, incorporating different types of substances used in care and diagnostic activities, as well as cleaning operations (pharmaceuticals, detergents, disinfectants, heavy metals, macropollutants), is vital. Moreover, further studies need to be focussed on evaluating the risk posed by pollutant mixtures, and work is needed to validate the predictive models proposed thus far [19, 49], to evaluate chronic toxicity due to PhCs and then-mixtures and to provide experimental data pertaining to specific case studies. 

Many other OECD activities on hazard/risk assessment are undertaken within programs such as Existing Chemicals, New Chemicals, and Pesticides and Biocides, which deal with specific types of chemicals. The work on exposure assessment methods is undertaken by the Task Force on Environmental Exposure Assessment, consisting of experts. Most of the outcome of this work is published in the Series on Testing and Assessment or in Emission Scenario Documents, which are available at the OECD Web site (OECD 2006a). 

Because closure is a new and unprecedented activity at JACADS and unexpected problems may arise during field activities, it may not be possible to identify all sources of risk during the planning phase. However, good project planning, risk assessment, and experienced proactive management can reduce the uncertainty. If new sources become evident as work progresses, they must be carefully addressed and the experience recorded to assist in closures of other disposal facilities. 

This chapter proposes the use of SSD and mixture toxicity models in ecological risk assessment of species assemblages by calculating the multisubstance potentially affected fraction of species on the basis of measured or predicted (biologically active) concentrations of toxic compounds in the environment. The msPAF method has been scrutinized for its conceptual basis. To address this scrutiny, we cite the human toxicology work of Ashford (1981) as a cross-link. 

Assessing the risks to health in the various work activities performed by employees. 

For risk-assessment purposes, the best choice is a field study which is carried out for the specific purpose of obtaining exposure values under representative conditions for the use scenario and active substance that are being considered. In view of the possible range of exposure due to the large number of potential variables, it is absolutely required that the study include between about 10 and 30 replicates spread over a reasonable time period accounting for variation in climatic conditions and the relevant application technique. The number of replicates per person should be as small as reasonably possible. Workers should be monitored during whole work shifts while using the relevant and/or required personal protection... 

---