Risk assessment forms

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997a. Special Report on Environmental Endocrine Disruption An Effects Assessment and Analysis. EPA/630/R-96/012. Risk Assessment Form, U.S. EPA, Washington DC., 111 pp. 

Risk and risk assessment are one of the fundamental ways safety and unsafety is managed on UK construction sites, and are prescribed by law. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations (1999) require that risks associated with any work activity are assessed before work starts. Risk assessments form the basis of many Health and Safety Regulations, and a standardised format and prescribed approach to the process often forms part of the safety management system toolkit in the establishment of safe systems of work. ... 

Figure 3.1 The risk assessment form Aspects to consider 46...

The risk assessment forms shall be forwarded to the process safety manager after all risk mitigations have been implemented. 

The process safety manager shall maintain the completed risk assessment forms for a period of five years. 

The assessor may use as many standard hazard risk assessment forms, such as that shown in Fig. 1.16, as the assessment requires. Upon completion they should be stapled together or placed in a plastic wallet and stored in the dedicated file. 

Bouwman Y (2013) Risk assessment forms for pharmacy preparation. Eur J Hosp Pharm 20 A58. doi 10.1136/ejhpharm-2013-000276.161... 

Answer the following questions to determine if the full MOC process needs to be followed. If the answer to all of these questions is No then the MOC Checklist does not have to be completed. If the answer to any question is Yes, the MOC Checklist Form (S8862) and a Job Safety/Risk Assessment Form (S8864) must be completed. 

When carrying out a risk assessment all types of hazard should be considered - injury, fire, explosion, pollution, damage to neighbours, damage to equipment etc. A typical risk assessment form is shown in Figure 4.7.1(a). 

Figure 4.7.1 (a) Risk assessment form (Courtesy British Sugar pic)... 

A wide variety of differing forms are used for recording risk assessments and there is no universal layout. In general forms reflect the requirement of the law and guidance issued by the enforcing authorities. The Five Steps to Risk Assessment document produced by the HSE suggests the minimum standards of what should be recorded on a risk assessment form. 

This guidance replaces the previous risk assessment methodology (the Guardrail Risk Assessment Form) used by TfL when assessing pedestrian guardrail. 

Most human or environmental healtli hazards can be evaluated by dissecting tlie analysis into four parts liazard identification, dose-response assessment or hazard assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. For some perceived healtli liazards, tlie risk assessment might stop with tlie first step, liazard identification, if no adverse effect is identified or if an agency elects to take regulatory action witliout furtlier analysis. Regarding liazard identification, a hazard is defined as a toxic agent or a set of conditions that luis the potential to cause adverse effects to hmnan health or tlie environment. Healtli hazard identification involves an evaluation of various forms of information in order to identify the different liaz.ards. Dose-response or toxicity assessment is required in an overall assessment responses/cffects can vary widely since all chemicals and contaminants vary in their capacity to cause adverse effects. This step frequently requires that assumptions be made to relate... 

U.S. EPA may list a waste as hazardous for any and all of the above reasons. The majority of listed wastes fall into the toxic waste category. To decide if a waste should be a toxic listed waste, U.S. EPA first determines whether it typically contains harmful chemical constituents. An appendix to RCRA contains a list of chemical compounds or elements that scientific studies have shown to have toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, or teratogenic effects on humans or other life forms. If a waste contains chemical constituents found on the appendix list, U.S. EPA then evaluates 11 other factors to determine if the wastestream is likely to pose a threat in the absence of special restrictions on its handling. These additional considerations include a risk assessment and study of past cases of damage caused by the waste. 

The Log-Probit Model. The log-probit model has been utilized widely in the risk assessment literature, although it has no physiological justification. It was first proposed by Mantel and Bryan, and has been found to provide a good fit with a considerable amount of empirical data (10). The model rests on the assumption that the susceptibility of a population or organisms to a carcinogen has a lognormal distribution with respect to dose, i.e., the logarithm of the dose will produce a positive response if normally distributed. The functional form of the model is ... 

The hazards identification procedures presented in chapter 10 include some aspects of risk assessment. The Dow F EI includes a calculation of the maximum probable property damage (MPPD) and the maximum probable days outage (MPDO). This is a form of consequences analysis. However, these numbers are obtained by some rather simple calculations involving published correlations. Hazard and operability (HAZOP) studies provide information on how a particular accident occurs. This is a form of incident identification. No probabilities or numbers are used with the typical HAZOP study, although the experience of the review committee is used to decide on an appropriate course of action. 

---