Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Winsor microemulsion

The Winsor microemulsion classification system distinguishes among three different types based on their phase behaviour ... [Pg.97]

Fig. 13 Effect of electrolyte concentration on Winsor microemulsion type (saliniu scan), w water o oil m microemulsion solubilization parameter volume of oil solubilized per mass of surfactant. Fig. 13 Effect of electrolyte concentration on Winsor microemulsion type (saliniu scan), w water o oil m microemulsion solubilization parameter volume of oil solubilized per mass of surfactant.
The first supercritical microemulsion model [43] was in good agreement with experimental data such as those of Figs. 6 and 7. The model also applies to the one-and two-phase reverse micelle systems of Sec. II. It was found that micelle-micelle interaction effects are dominant in reverse micelle systems where the water/oil ratio is small. However, in the Winsor microemulsion systems described in this section, which have a water/oil ratio near unity, the size of the reverse micelles in the oil phase is determined by natural curvature effects. Micelle-micelle interactions become important at phase transition points, as was observed experimentally in the AOT-brine-propane system [21,23]. The transition between the natural curvature and micelle-micelle interaction mechanisms can be understood in detail on a ternary phase diagram [43]. [Pg.292]

Figure 3.18 Schematic of ternary phase diagrams for Winsor microemulsions. In the left-hand shaded area, the microemulsion is in equilibrium with excess water, and in the right-hand shaded area, the microemulsion is in equilibrium with excess oil... Figure 3.18 Schematic of ternary phase diagrams for Winsor microemulsions. In the left-hand shaded area, the microemulsion is in equilibrium with excess water, and in the right-hand shaded area, the microemulsion is in equilibrium with excess oil...
A beautiful and elegant example of the intricacies of surface science is the formation of transparent, thermodynamically stable microemulsions. Discovered about 50 years ago by Winsor [76] and characterized by Schulman [77, 78], microemulsions display a variety of useful and interesting properties that have generated much interest in the past decade. Early formulations, still under study today, involve the use of a long-chain alcohol as a cosurfactant to stabilize oil droplets 10-50 nm in diameter. Although transparent to the naked eye, microemulsions are readily characterized by a variety of scattering, microscopic, and spectroscopic techniques, described below. [Pg.516]

Shioi A and Flarada M 1996 Model for the geometry of surfactant assemblies in the oil-rich phase of Winsor I microemulsions J. Chem. Eng. Japan 29 95... [Pg.2915]

Depicted in Fig. 2, microemulsion-based liquid liquid extraction (LLE) of biomolecules consists of the contacting of a biomolecule-containing aqueous solution with a surfactant-containing lipophilic phase. Upon contact, some of the water and biomolecules will transfer to the organic phase, depending on the phase equilibrium position, resulting in a biphasic Winsor II system (w/o-ME phase in equilibrium with an excess aqueous phase). Besides serving as a means to solubilize biomolecules in w/o-MEs, LLE has been frequently used to isolate and separate amino acids, peptides and proteins [4, and references therein]. In addition, LLE has recently been employed to isolate vitamins, antibiotics, and nucleotides [6,19,40,77-79]. Industrially relevant applications of LLE are listed in Table 2 [14,15,20,80-90]. [Pg.478]

Fatty alcohol- (or alkyl-)ethoxylates, CoE, are considered to be better candidates for LLE based on their ability to induce rapid phase separation for Winsor II and III systems. (Winsor III systems consist of excess aqueous and organic phases, and a middle phase containing bicontinuous microemulsions.) However, C,E,-type surfactants alone cannot extract biomolecules, presumably because they have no net negative charge, in contrast to sorbitan esters [24,26,30,31]. But, when combined with an additional anionic surfactant such as AOT or sodium benzene dodecyl sulfonate (SDBS), or affinity surfactant, extraction readily occurs [30,31]. The second surfactant must be present beyond a minimum threshold value so that its interfacial concentration is sufficiently large to be seen by... [Pg.482]

These systems were referred to by Clausse t a (21) as Type U systems. On the other hand, with cofurfactants with chain length Cg to Cy (Figur 3 e-g), the Winsor IV domain is split into two disjointed areas that are separated by a composition zone over which viscous turbid and birifringent media are encountered. This second class of systems was referred as Type S systems (24). It can also be seen that the Winsor IV domain reaches its maximum extension at reducing in size below and above C. Moreover, at C, one observes a small monophasic region near the W apex (probably o/w microemulsion of the Schulman s type) which vanishes as the alcohol chain length is increased to Cg. [Pg.163]

Winsor [15] classified the phase equilibria of microemulsions into four types, now called Winsor I-IV microemulsions, illustrated in Fig. 15.5. Types I and II are two-phase systems where a surfactant rich phase, the microemulsion, is in equilibrium with an excess organic or aqueous phase, respectively. Type III is a three-phase system in which a W/O or an O/W microemulsion is in equilibrium with an excess of both the aqueous and the organic phase. Finally, type IV is a single isotropic phase. In many cases, the properties of the system components require the presence of a surfactant and a cosurfactant in the organic phase in order to achieve the formation of reverse micelles one example is the mixture of sodium dodecylsulfate and pentanol. [Pg.660]

The Winsor II microemulsion is the configuration that has attracted most attention in solvent extraction from aqueous feeds, as it does not affect the structure of the aqueous phase the organic extracting phase, on the other hand, is now a W/0 microemulsion instead of a single phase. The main reason for the interest in W/0 microemulsions is that the presence of the aqueous microphase in the extracting phase may enhance the extraction of hydrophilic solutes by solubilizing them in the reverse micellar cores. However, this is not always the case and it seems to vary with the characteristics of the system and the type of solute. Furthermore, in many instances the mechanism of extraction enhancement is not simply solubilization into the reverse micellar cores. Four solubilization sites are possible in a reverse micelle, as illustrated in Fig. 15.6 [19]. An important point is that the term solubilization does not apply only to solute transfer into the reverse micelle cores, but also to insertion into the micellar boundary region called the palisade. The problem faced by researchers is that the exact location of the solute in the microemulsion phase is difficult to determine with most of the available analytical tools, and thus it has to be inferred. [Pg.661]

Winsor reported that the phase behavior of SOW systems at equilibrium could exhibit essentially three types, so called Wl, Wll and Will, illustrated by the phase diagrams indicated in Fig. 1. In the Wl (respectively, Wll) case, the surfactant bears a stronger affinity for the water (respectively, oil) phase and most of it partitions into water (respectively, oil). As a consequence, the system exhibits a two-phase behavior in which a microemulsion is in equihb-rium with excess oil (respectively, water). [Pg.86]

Gold nanoparticles from 2.5 to 5 nm sizes have also been prepared by using a biphasic Winsor II [126] (a water-in-oil microemulsion that is in equilibrium with the excess water phase) type microemulsion of diethyl ether/AOT/water. The surfactant, AOT, performs the dual role of forming a microemulsion and the transferring of charged metal ions from the aqueous to organic phase. This provides gold nanoparticles, which are readily dispersed in the nonpolar phase. [Pg.207]

Many reports are available where the cationic surfactant CTAB has been used to prepare gold nanoparticles [127-129]. Giustini et al. [130] have characterized the quaternary w/o micro emulsion of CTAB/n-pentanol/ n-hexane/water. Some salient features of CTAB/co-surfactant/alkane/water system are (1) formation of nearly spherical droplets in the L2 region (a liquid isotropic phase formed by disconnected aqueous domains dispersed in a continuous organic bulk) stabilized by a surfactant/co-surfactant interfacial film. (2) With an increase in water content, L2 is followed up to the water solubilization failure, without any transition to bicontinuous structure, and (3) at low Wo, the droplet radius is smaller than R° (spontaneous radius of curvature of the interfacial film) but when the droplet radius tends to become larger than R° (i.e., increasing Wo), the microemulsion phase separates into a Winsor II system. [Pg.207]

Khomane et al. prepared dodecanethiol-capped CdS QDs of 4 nm size by using a Winsor II microemulsion system [242], which are soluble in solvents such as n-heptane, toluene, n-hexane, thus demonstrating the dual role of the anionic surfactant, viz., forming the microemulsion and facilitating the extraction of oppositely charged ions from the aqueous to the organic phase. [Pg.217]

Manna A, Imae T, Yogo T, Aoi K, Okazaki M (2002) Synthesis of gold nanoparticles in a Winsor II type microemulsion and their characterization. J Colloid Interface Sci 256 297-303... [Pg.226]

Khomane RB, Manna A, Mandate AB, Kulkarni BD (2002) Synthesis and characterization of dodecanethiol-capped cadmimn sulfide nanoparticles in a Winsor II microemulsion of diethyl ether/AOT/water. Langmuir 18 8237-8240... [Pg.232]

The most complicated case, which is not predicted by Leung et al. (107), is the domain where both instabilities coexist, the so-called Winsor III microemulsion in equilibrium with both water and oil in excess. [Pg.402]

Figure 1 shows changes in the system phase behavior as its HLB value is systematically adjusted. The left side of the diagram represents a two-phase system with micellar-solubilized oil in equilibrium with an excess oil phase (Winsor Type I) (Winsor 1954). The right side of the diagram represents a different two-phase system with reversed micellar-solubilized water. In-between these two systems a third phase coemerges which contains enriched surfactant with solubilized water and oil. This new thermodynamically stable phase is known as a Winsor Type HI middle phase microemulsion. [Pg.246]

A microemulsion that has a high water content and is stable while in contact with a bulk oil phase, and in laboratory tube or bottle tests tends to be situated at the bottom of the tube, underneath the oil phase. For chlorinated organic liquids, which are denser than water, the oil is at the bottom phase rather than the top. See Microemulsion, Winsor-Type Emulsions. [Pg.381]

A special kind of stabilized emulsion in which the dispersed droplets are extremely small (<100 nm) and the emulsion is thermodynamically stable. These emulsions are transparent and can form spontaneously. In some usage a lower size-limit of about 10 nm is implied in addition to the upper limit see also Micellar Emulsion. In some usage the term microemulsion is reserved for a Winsor type IV system (water, oil, and surfactants all in a single phase). See also Winsor Type Emulsions. [Pg.383]

A microemulsion that has high oil and water content and is stable while in contact with either bulk oil or bulk water phases. This stability can be caused by a bi-continu-ous structure in which both oil and water phases are simultaneously continuous. In laboratory tube or bottle tests involving samples containing unemulsified oil and water, a middle-phase microemulsion tends to situate between the two phases. See also Winsor Type Emulsions. [Pg.383]

Several types of phase behaviour occur in microemulsions they are denoted as Nelson type IT, type II+, and type III. These designations refer to equilibrium phase behaviours and distinguish, for example, the number of phases that can be in equilibrium and the nature of the continuous phase. Winsor-type emulsions are similarly identified, but with different type numbers. [Pg.384]

Several categories of microemulsions that refer to equilibrium phase behaviours and that distinguish, for example, the number of phases that can be in equilibrium and the nature of the continuous phase. They are denoted as Winsor Type I (oil-in-water), Type II (water-in-oil), Type III (most of the surfactant is in a middle phase with oil and water), and Type IV (water, oil, and surfactant are all present in a single phase). The Winsor Type III system is sometimes referred to as a middle-phase microemulsion , and the Type IV system is often referred to simply as a microemulsion . An advantage of the Winsor category system is that it is independent of the density of the oil phase and can lead to less ambiguity than do the lower-phase or upper-phase microemulsion type terminology. Nelson type emulsions are similarly identified, but with different type numbers. [Pg.399]

At low temperatures an O/W microemulsion (0/Wm) is formed which is in equilibrium with an excess oil phase. This condition is termed a Winsor I system. At high temperatures the headgroup requires less space on the interface and, thus, a negative curvature can result. A phase inversion o ccurs and a W/O microemulsion (W/Om) is formed which is in equilibrium with an excess water phase. This situation is termed a Winsor II system. At intermediate temperatures three phases - a water phase, a microemulsion D and an oil phase - are in equilibrium. This is called a Winsor III system. Here the curvature of the interfaces is more or less zero. Hence, the interfacial tension is minimum as depicted in Figure 3.24 (right) for the system C12E5, tetradecane and water. [Pg.71]

An interesting phenomenon in water-oil-amphiphile systems is the presence of self-assembled arrays of amphiphiles (surfactants) called micelles. From 1948 to 1950, Philip Alan Winsor reported that upon simple mixing (i.e., without the need for high shear conditions), oil, water, and amphiphiles yielded clear, macro-scopically homogeneous single phases which he termed type IV systems (Winsor, 1948, 1950). The term microemulsion was introduced later by Jack H. Shulman, a Columbia University chemistry professor, to denote these thermodynamically stable optically isotropic, transparent oil-water-amphiphile dispersions (Shulman et al., 1959). Type IV systems contain small droplets of one liquid dispersed within the other, with a self-assembled layer of surfactant molecules (micelles) along the interface between the two phases. The spontaneous self-assembly of the micelle is driven by the thermodynamic tendency to minimize the surface tension between the water and the oil in the presence of the amphiphile (Hoar and Shulman, 1943). [Pg.221]

Organic reactions in micro emulsions need not be performed in one-phase systems. It has been found that most reactions work well also in two-phase Winsor I or Winsor II systems, i.e. an oil-in-water microemulsion coexisting with excess oil or a water-in-oil microemulsion coexisting with excess water, respectively [7, 8]. A Winsor III system, i.e. a three-phase system in which a middle phase microemulsion coexists with both oil and water, has also been successfully used as reaction medium [9]. The transport of reactants from the excess oil or water phase to the microemulsion phase, where the reaction takes place, is evidently fast compared to the rate of the reaction. This is a practically important aspect on the use of micro emulsions as media for chemical reactions because it simplifies the formulation work. Formulating a Winsor I or Winsor II system is usually much easier than formulating a one-phase microemulsion of the whole reaction mixture. Winsor systems can also be of value to simplify the work-up process, in particular to separate the product from the surfactant, as will be discussed below in Sect. 2.4 (see also [6]). [Pg.55]

Figure 1 illustrates the use of Winsor I and Winsor II systems as reaction media for the synthesis of 1-phenoxyoctane from sodium phenoxide and 1-bro-mooctane. The reaction was performed in microemulsions based on various... [Pg.55]

Lif and Holmberg have demonstrated the efficiency of microemulsions as a medium for both organic and bioorganic hydrolysis of a 4-nitrophenyl ester see Scheme 3 of Fig. 3 [7]. The reactions were performed in a Winsor I type microemulsion and took place in the lower phase oil-in-water microemulsion. After the reaction was complete a Winsor I—>111 transition was induced by a rise in temperature. The products formed, 4-nitrophenol and decanoic acid, partitioned into the upper oil phase and could easily be isolated by separation of this phase and evaporation of the solvent. The principle is outlined in Fig. 4. The surfactant and the enzyme (in the case of the lipase-catalysed reaction) resided in the middle-phase microemulsion and could be reused. [Pg.61]

An attempt was also made to accelerate the same reaction performed in a microemulsion based on water, nonionic surfactant and hydrocarbon oil [9]. The reaction was performed in a Winsor III system and the same Q salt, tetra-butyl ammonium hydrogen sulfate, was added to the formulation. In this case the addition of the phase transfer catalyst gave only a marginal increase in reaction rate. Similar results have been reported for an alkylation reaction performed in different types of micellar media [52]. The addition of a Q salt gave no effect for a system based on cationic surfactant, a marginal increase in rate for a system based on nonionic surfactant and a substantial effect when an anionic... [Pg.65]

The effect of surfactant charge on the reaction rate was investigated for a related reaction, ring opening of 1,2-epoxyoctane with sodium hydrogen sulfite (Scheme 2 of Fig. 2). The reaction, which was performed in a Winsor III microemulsion, was fast when a nonionic surfactant was used as the sole surfactant and considerably more sluggish when a small amount of SDS was added to the formulation [9]. [Pg.67]

Abstract This review describes how the unique nanostructures of water-in-oU (W/0), oil-in-water (0/W) and bicontinuous microemulsions have been used for the syntheses of some organic and inorganic nanomaterials. Polymer nanoparticles of diameter approximately 10-50 nm can easily be obtained, not only from the polymerization of monomers in all three types of microemulsions, but also from aWinsor l-like system. A Winsor 1-like system with a semi-continuous process can be used to produce microlatexes with high weight ratios of polymer to surfactant (up to 25). On the other hand, to form inorganic nanoparticles, it is best to carry out the appropriate chemical reactions in W/0- and bicontinuous microemulsions. [Pg.258]

In addition to single phase microemulsions, several phase equilibria known as Winsor systems [4] are also shown at low surfactant concentrations. A Winsor I (WI) system consists of an 0/W microemulsion that is in equilibrium with an oil phase, while a Winsor II (WII) system is a W/0 microemulsion in equilibrium with an aqueous phase. A Will system has a middle phase (bicontinuous) microemulsion that coexists with both oil and aqueous phases. [Pg.260]


See other pages where Winsor microemulsion is mentioned: [Pg.660]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.547]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.97 ]




SEARCH



Winsor

Winsorization

© 2024 chempedia.info