Wastewater collection and treatment

The development that has taken place is the result of 100-150 years of enormous investments. All over the world, this has left us with a sewer and treatment plant infrastructure that will be in use for an unknown future. We will still see developments in terms of technical improvements and sustainable solutions. However, we will not, as a general trend, see the wastewater collection and treatment concept replaced by, e.g., centralized collection of solid human excreta or on-site solutions. This could have been a realistic option for further development 150 years ago — not now ... 

ASCE (1989), Sulfide in wastewater collection and treatment systems, ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice 69, 324. 

Lincoln City, Oregon, Wastewater Collection and Treatment Facilities, Lincoln City, Oregon, URL http //www.ci.lincoln-city.or.ns/works/wwtp/wwtp.html, 2003. 

Sulfide in Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems American Society of Civil Engineers, 1989, Product No. 681-4,... 

Any Nation s water sector is critical from both a public health and an economic standpoint. The water sector consists of two basic, yet vital, components fresh water supply and wastewater collection and treatment. Sector infrastructures are diverse, complex, and distributed, ranging from systems that serve a few customers to those that serve millions. These utilities depend onreservoirs, dams, wells, andaquifers, as well as treatment facilities, pmnping stations, aqueducts, and transmission pipelines. (PCCIP, 1997). 

When environmental engineering, once a branch of civil engineering, first became a separate field in the mid-1800 s, it was known as sanitary engineering. Initially, the field involved the water supply, water treatment, and wastewater collection and treatment. 

Over two billion people on the planet lack adequate sanitation, and one billion do not have sufficient access to potable water. Energy demands for conventional water and wastewater processes are a large part of the problem. In the US, we use approximately 4-5% of our electricity production for the water infrastructure, which includes water treatment and distribution, and wastewater collection and treatment. Approximately 1.5% of our electricity goes to wastewater treatment alone. The costs for maintaining the infrastructure are significant, with an annual cost for wastewater treatment of 25 billion. It is expected that over the next twenty years an additional 45 billion will need to be expended to maintain and improve this infrastructure WIN200]). 

Whittaker, K. F Nye, J. C. Wukash, R. F. Squires, R. G. York, N. C. and Kazimier, H. A. Collection and Treatment of Wastewater Generated by Pesticide Applicators. Unpublished report, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 1979. 

The accomplishment of these objectives involved two different research grants Grant No. R 805 466010, "Collection and Treatment of Wastewater Generated by Pesticide Applicators", from the Oil and Hazardous Spills Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and "Removal of Five R-PAR and Near R-Par Herbicides from Wastewater", from North Central Regional Pesticide Impact Assessment Program. 

TREATABILITY/REMOVABILITY Process, Removable Range (%), Avg. Achievable Cone. (pg/L)) Powdered activated carbon adsorption (based on synthetic wastewater), 100, 5 granular activated carbon and chemical oxidation are other treatment alternatives for contaminated water for contaminated soil, well point collection and treatment of leachates... 

Sofia Garrido Hoyos (drinking water collection and treatment of rainwater biological wastewater treatment treatment and/or utilization of sludge and biosolids), Mexican Institute of Water Technology (IMTA), Jiutepec, Mor. 

Tier 0 and Tier 1 costs are direct and indirect costs. They include the engineering, materials, labor, construction, contingency, etc., as well as waste-collection and transportation services (in many cases we simply transform an air pollution problem into a solid waste or wastewater problem that requires final treatment and disposal), raw-material consumption (increase or decrease), and production costs. Tier 2 and... 

The non-penicillin wastewater from a pharmaceutical company was collected and used in the batch aeration wastewater treatment experiment. The pharmaceutical wastewater had a clear orange colour, strong odour, contained toxic chemicals and had a COD value in the range of 3000-30,000 mg per litre. The pH of the wastewater was neutralised and monitored for each experimental ran, as the bacteria would have a higher rate of propagation at neutral pH. 

Kraft pulp mills treat wastewater using primary (physical) and secondary (biological) treatment to reduce pollutant discharges to receiving waters. Kraft mills typically collect and treat the following wastewaters36 ... 

The main points of collection and subsequent release of these contaminants into the environment are wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), where they enter via domestic and hospital sewages or industrial discharges [1]. Some of them are more likely accumulated in sewage sludge, due to their moderate to high hydrophobic... 

The flows of wastewater originating from the water supply of a community and runoff from precipitation on urban surfaces are typically collected and conveyed for treatment and disposal. The system used for this purpose is called a sewer network or a collection system that consists of individual pipes (sewer lines) and a number of installations, such as inlet structures and pumps, to facilitate collection and transport. The efficient, safe and cost-effective collection and transport of wastewater and urban runoff have been identified as key criteria to be observed. In this context, the word safe means that public health, welfare and environmental protection have high priority. The demand for solutions toward more sustainable water management in the cities is a new challenge. 

In conventional design and management practice, treatment of wastewater is assumed to take place entirely within the treatment plant, while a sewer network serves the sole purpose of collecting and transporting wastewater from source to treatment. The concept of considering the sewer as a process reactor... 

A sewer network and any corresponding treatment have traditionally been separately designed and operated. Two different and separate functions have been dealt with the sewer system must collect and convey the wastewater to the treatment plant, and the treatment plant must reduce pollution load into the receiving water according to the quality standards set. Consequently, sewers are often just considered input systems at the boundaries where they are connected with wastewater treatment plants and overflow structures that discharge untreated wastewater into watercourses during rainfall. This traditional approach to sewer performance needs considerable improvement. 

Against this background, a sustainable and integrated dimension of wastewater management in sewer networks is needed. The safe and efficient collection and conveyance of wastewater to treatment and disposal are still main concerns. The consideration of sewer processes as an element in the design and operation of sewers will give anew dimension to the overall objective of sewer management and contribute to improved sustainability. Therefore, the technical systems must be considered holistically ... 

The water that is currently being produced by the recovery system is collected and treated on site. The wastewater treatment plant reduced the chemical concentrations to desirable levels and then discharged the treated water into an existing county sanitation district industrial sewer. In this manner, all fluids produced by the recovery system were treated for disposal or reprocessed. 

Wastewaters may be collected in separate drainage systems (for process, sanitary, and storm water) althongh industrial and stormwater systems may in some cases be combined. In addition, ballast water from bulk crude tankers may be pnmped to receiving facilities at the refinery site prior to removal of floating oil in an interceptor and treatment as for other wastewater streams. 

In most countries, solid waste containing metals such as neutralization sludge from the plating industry and flue dust from the metal and steel industries is currently collected and dumped in landfill, where it constitutes a perpetual toxic threat to the environment and a waste of resources. The alternatives to this landfill disposal are either to reduce the rate of discharge at source by an individually designed recovery process or to separate and recover the metals from the collected waste in a centrally located facility. A presumption for a centrally located facility would be that companies with metals in their effluents require treatment of their total wastewater streams. This could be accomplished through the relatively simple process of neutralization, which requires minor investment in sedimentation tanks and dewatering equipment and involves relatively modest operation costs. 

---