Waste handling construction

The primary factor in determining a production programs survival is its overhead. Because of the high costs of reactants and toxic handling in compound semiconductor production, the overhead is often determined, in large part, by the cost associated with system operation and maintenance. These costs include facilitization (including clean rooms, gas enclosures and other safety-related constructions), system amortization consumables such as reactants, wafers, chemicals, and filters, waste handling, and safety compliance. 

Nevertheless, a number of mixed waste processing facilities (MWPFs) were built during the 1990s, with the total number in operation in the United States reaching 63 in 1997. By 2000, many of these had been closed, so the number was down to 52, with more closures forecast. Capital costs were often higher than anticipated, recovery rates were lower, and there were difficulties in operation. Some MWPFs changed to MRFs because of these difficulties. More than half of all U.S. MWPFs in 2000 were located in the western states, mostly in California. These facilities generally handle yard waste and construction and demolition debris in addition to municipal waste. ... 

Often, the immobilized product has a structural strength sufficient to prevent fracturing over time. Solidification accomplishes the objective by changing a non-solid waste material into a solid, monolithic structure that ideally will not permit liquids to percolate into or leach materials out of the mass. Stabilization, on the other hand, binds the hazardous constituents into an insoluble matrix or changes the hazardous constituent to an insoluble form. Other objectives of solidiflcation/stabilization processes are to improve handling of the waste and pri uce a stable solid (no free liquid) for subsequent use as a construction material or for landfilling. 

Although the problems associated with the corrosion and protection of jointed structures have been recognised since the early days of structural fabrication, they have taken on a special significance in the past 15 years. The motivation for the increased impetus is mainly one of concern over possible costly, hazardous or environmentally unfriendly failures particularly those concerned with offshore constructions, nuclear reactors, domestic water systems, food handling, waste disposal and the like. 

All plutonium produced must be prevented from spreading into the environment. It is presently believed that the safest way is to store plutonium waste in deep underground facilities, and several such are now being constructed (8, 9, 12, 13). In the future, however, releases of various sizes must be anticipated, considering the large amounts of plutonium being handled. The hazards associated with such releases must be reliably assessed. 

BP Chemical s work in feedstock recycling of plastics waste is examined, and the feasibility is discussed of the construction of a commercial chemical recycling plant in the UK. The company s Grangemouth plant, which could handle 500 tons/year of plastic waste is noted, but the... 

The process can handle a wide range of materials, including heavy metal contaminated wastes. It is very fast compared to conventional processes and produces an easily handled product that can be used in construction. Waste CO2 can be captured and converted into carbonate to yield carbon credits. Target applications include pre-treatment of waste prior to disposal, recychng and reuse of industrial waste, and remediation of contaminated brownfield sites. 

Those elements of conventional laboratory design that must be refined for facilities in which toxic chemicals will be handled are presented. Alarms, communications, construction materials, containment cabinets, filter systems, floor plans, security, compressed gases, and waste disposal are discussed. Emphasis is given to design considerations dictated by the use of large numbers of fume hoods. 

---