Walkthrough

The implementation phase represents the delivery of the training. Classroom, self-study or computer based training is typically suitable for knowledge related objectives. Hands on performance training, walkthrough or simulation is most appropriate for procedure tasks. 

The intent of the walkthrough inspection is to acquire a good overview of occupant activities and building functions and to look for lAQ problem indicators. No specific forms are suggested for this stage of lAQ profile development. However,... 

The walkthrough inspection can be used to identify areas with a high jwtential for... 

The walkthrough should focus on uneven temperatures, persistent odors, drafts, sensations of stuffiness. You may find that occupants are attempting to compensate for an HVAC system that doesn t meet their needs. Look for propped-open corridor doors, blocked or taped-up diffusers, popped-up ceiling tiles, people using individual fans/heaters or wearing heavier (or lighter) clothing than normal. 

An initial walkthrough of the problem area provides information about all four of the basic factors influencing indoor air quality (occupants, HVAC system, pollutant pathways, and contaminant sources). The initial walkthrough may provide enough... 

Often, the walkthrough and analysis of the process flow sheets lead to an early identification of P2 and waste-reduction opportunities. By studying the process flow sheets and information gathered from the walkthrough, and by conducting brainstorming sessions with team members, the team will be able to identify sources... 

Train operating personnel in recognizing criteria for blowdown activation and verification, and what to do if it fails. This should consist of a mixture of drills, scenarios, walkthroughs and, if possible, simulator trials. 

Examples of test data sets available (e.g., test scripts or automated test tools that would be suitable for version purchased) Boundary/stress/unexpected input tests Structural/functional testing (documentation of walkthroughs, etc.)... 

The detailed design description is translated into source code. Useful descriptions for a module, including expected inputs and outputs, operations to be performed, and expected data types, are often provided in code comments. Source code evaluations, such as code inspections and code walkthroughs, should be conducted to verily compliance with the corresponding design specifications. 

The checklist should be included in the PrHA report. The PrHA team should summarize the deficiencies noted during the walkthroughs and/or meetings. Understanding these deficiencies usually leads to the development of a list of possible safety improvement alternatives for managers to consider, or a list of identified hazards and a set of suggested actions. 

Feedback from prototypes, scenarios, and models As always, any live media provides valuable feedback and validation of models being built. For example, storyboards, prototypes of UI screens, CRC-card-based scenarios, and model walkthroughs can all be used. 

One can apply the MC technique to the same molecular model, as explored in MD. One can use the same box and the same molecules that experience exactly the same potentials, and therefore the results are equally exact for equilibrium membranes. However, MC examples of this type are very rare. One of the reasons for this is that there is no commercial package available in which an MC strategy is combined with sufficient chemistry know-how and tuned force fields. Unlike the MD approach, where the phase-space trajectory is fixed by the equations of motion of the molecules, the optimal walkthrough phase space in an MC run may depend strongly on the system characteristics. In particular, for densely packed layers, it may be very inefficient to withdraw a molecule randomly and to let it reappear somewhere else in... 

Comparable performance As above plus method walkthrough and training at transferring site Standard comparability protocol (1 batch, 2 analysts, n=6 replicates) Standard comparability protocol (1 batch, 2 analysts, n=6 replicates) As above, plus comparability performance measure successfully attained and documented... 

Freedman D, Weinberg G. Handbook of Walkthroughs, Inspections and Technical Reviews. Boston Little, Brown, 1982. 

Software verification consists of tasks performed to evaluate if the software is performing desired tasks and providing desirable results. Software verification is part of software validation. Software testing is one of the many verification activities intended to confirm that software development output meets its input requirements. Other verification activities include various static and dynamic analyses, code and document inspections, walkthroughs, and other techniques [14]. 

A variety of methods have been developed to review software (e.g., inspections, walkthrough, and audit). Flow charts graphically representing data flow and software module architecture will clearly aid the review, particularly when verifying design requirements. 

Computer systems validation, as established in 21 CFR Part 211.68, Automatic, Mechanical, and Electronic Equipment, is one of the most important requirements in FDA-regulated operations and an element of the system life cycle (SLC). In addition to the testing of the computer technology, other verifications and inspection activities include code walkthroughs, dynamic analysis and trace analysis. These activities may require 40% of overall project efforts. 

Computer systems validation is an element of the SLC. In addition to the software and hardware testing, other verification activities include code walkthroughs, dynamic analysis, and trace analysis. 

Develop programs based on the development (e.g., coding) standards, and build Part 11 technical controls into the system Review code integrity using static analysis, audit(s), inspection(s), ieview(s), and/or walkthrough(s)... 

The following text will give you a walkthrough of the use of this spreadsheet and the McCabe-Thiele equilibrium curve. MTPlot72 is applicable as a template in solving any liquid-liquid problem. 

The personnel working in the corrosion laboratory are usually exposed to a variety of chemicals and gases. The monitoring of airborne contaminants is to ensure that potential employee exposures are controlled. It is also useful to monitor chemical exposure of personnel and to compare the levels with chemical exposure guidelines of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) OSHA (29 CFR 910.1450, 29 CFR 1910.1048, 11910.1001-1101, Z9 CFR 1910, subpart Z and National Health Canada). It is also useful to perform a walkthrough check for hazardous chemicals and exposure of personnel to the chemicals, as shown in Figure 3.2. 

---