Validation strategies

In contrast to the DNA damage checkpoint, the mitotic spindle checkpoint is essential for cell viability. Dierefore, targeting kinases of the spindle checkpoint including Bubl, BubRl, and Mpsl might be a valid strategy for anticancer treatment. 

After determining that a system must be validated, setting the validation strategy for that system should include the following ... 

EPA. 1994c. Validation strategy for the integrated exposure uptake biokinetic model for lead in children. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 540/R-94-039. PB94-963504. 

With a proper balancing of C and Ci this turned out to be a valid strategy, which of course is very sensitive to changes in the weighing factors of other terms in the objective function components. The makespan can be simply obtained by introducing an additional inequality that describes that the makespan should be greater than the end-time of casting for the last - or all - batches. 

Sometimes there are problems for which no empirically validated strategies exist. These situations challenge therapists and counselors to develop creative approaches to addressing unusual problems. On the one hand, it is very important to use an empirically validated approach to correct a problem if such an approach exists, because it makes little sense to reinvent the wheel when a radial tire may already be available to you. However, if the wheel has not been invented or tested, therapists and counselors still have to do something. 

Even when the path is unknown, there may be many clues about what may help. Novel problems may have some similarities to other, more well-known problems for which empirically validated interventions have been tested and developed. In such cases, those validated strategies may be modified to treat the problem at hand. In some instances, you may not have to reinvent the wheel so much as adjust it so it fits a different cart. In other cases, perhaps someone in your professional network has worked with a similar problem and can provide consultation regarding what she or he did, and whether it worked. 

My advice is to use empirically validated approaches to treating problems as much as you can so you can provide the best care available for your client. This will protect your client, but also may protect you as a professional from litigation. Using empirically validated strategies also helps instill confidence in your client that the care she or he receives will be the best available, which of course makes it more likely that the client will commit to the treatment plan. If there is a unique or unusual problem for which no known empirically validated strategy has been developed, then you may have to create a novel and creative approach for intervening upon the problem. In those cases, it is important to share this information... 

Bouabidi, A., Rozet, E., Fillet, M., Ziemons, E., Chapuzet, E., Mertens, B., Klinkenberg, R., Ceccato, A., Talbi, M., Streel, B., Bouklouze, A., Boulanger, B., Hubert, P. Critical analysis of several analytical method validation strategies in the framework of the fit for purpose concept. J. Chromatogr. A., 1217, 2010, 3180-3192. 

Lesko, L.J. and Atkinson, A.J., Jr., Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints — Use in drug development and regulatory decision making criteria, validation, strategies, Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol, 41, 347-366, 2001. 

Source Harris S. Transgenic knockouts as part of high-throughput, evidence-based target selection and validation strategies, Drug Discovery Today 16 628-636 (2001). 

In accordance with GAMP, there are different validation strategies depending on the categories of software the degree of validation increases from a general system to a custom system (see Exhibit 9.9). 

Validation should always proceed according to a validation plan. A well-defined validation strategy saves time and effort on the part of the... 

FIGURE I Schematic diagram showing the overall validation strategy, which includes calibration, system validation, and system suitability testing. Figure adopted with ideas from Reference I. 

The development of models always requires these models to be carefully validated (see Fig. 2.7), by means of a proper validation strategy, in order to provide information about the actual validity and usefulness in relation to the problem studied. If not validated, a model is not exploitable in the practice, since the reliability of its outcomes is completely unknown. 

The optimal complexity of the PLS model, that is, the most appropriate number of latent variables, is determined by evaluating, with a proper validation strategy (see Section Vl.F), the prediction error corresponding to models with increasing complexity. The parameter considered is usually the standard deviation of the error of calibration (SDEC), if computed with the objects used for building the model, or the standard deviation of the error of prediction (SDEP), if computed with objects not used for building the model (see Section Vl.F). 

A better validation strategy, in such cases, is to use three sample subsets a training set, an optimization set, and an evaluation set. The optimization set is used to find the best modeling settings, while the actual reliability of fhe final model is esfimafed by way of a real prediction on the third subset, formed by objecfs fhaf have never influenced the model. The three-set validation procedure should always be used in ANN modeling, which presents a very high risk of overfiffing. 

Perform a correct and extensive validation of models, in order to properly evaluate their prediction ability and thus their actual applicability. In particular, mind that if model building involves optimization steps, a three-set validation strategy should be applied. 

Michiels S, Koscielny S, Hill C. Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet 2005 365 488 92. 

However, certain fundamental concepts of cGMPs must be applied regardless of the details of the phased appropriate method validation strategy used. Examples are (1) proper documentation, (2) change control, (3) deviations, (4) equipment and utilities qualification, and (5) proper training. 

A validation protocol is necessary to define the specific items and activities that will constitute any validation study. It is advisable for companies to draw up a VMP indicating the overall validation strategy for either the product range or equipment type or the entire site. The protocol must be prepared before initiation of the study and must either include or refer to the documentation required to provide information about a specific process, the parameters involved in that specific process, the personnel responsibilities, and the acceptance criteria. 

J. Burrows, N. Shearsby, J. Chiu, K. Watson, and A. Witkowski, A Pre-validation Strategy for Evaluating Bioanalytical Methods, No. 3186 (available from BAS Analytics, West Lafayette, IN). 

Earlier in the discussion of process validation strategies, 20 production batches were suggested as a minimum number upon which to draw conclusions about the validity of the process. In this particular example, however, two distinct methods of drying are provided. In order to have sufficient history on each operation, the number of batches examined was increased to 30. 

The pharmaceutical manufacturer must establish effective policies and plans for regulatory compliance and validation to enable individuals to clearly understand the company commitment and requirements. Computer validation planning should ensure an appropriate training program, preparation of validation guidelines and procedures, system GMP compliance risk and criticality assessment, a documented validation strategy and rationale, clearly defined quality-related critical parameters and data for the manufacturing process. 

Validation strategy (including reference to the respective regulations)... 

Chapter 5 establishes the top-down approach for integrating computer systems validation strategies in support to the computer systems validation program. 

During the implementation or update process, the introduction of a computer validation management cycle will provide a top-down approach to integrate computer systems validation strategies in order to support the project. Figure 5-1 suggests a computer validation management cycle. 

To reduce the data validation expense, a combination of Level 4 and Level 3 validation may be used without compromising data quality. For example, 20 percent of the project data may undergo a Level 4 validation and 80 percent will then have a Level 3 validation. A 10 percent Level 4 and 90 percent Level 3 combination is often considered sufficient for many decisions. Example 5.1 illustrates several validation strategies that may be used for projects with different objectives. 

---