Unit operations, simulation

The system is designed so that it can be used independently as a stand-alone system with all equipment sizes and process data supplied as input. Or, it can be run in conduction with the unit operations simulation portion of ASPEN and can refer to those blocks for equipment sizes and process data. 

Process calculations for traditional unit-operations equipment can be divided into two types design and performance. Sometimes the performance calculation is caHed a simulation (see Simulation and process design). The design calculation is used to roughly size or specify the equipment. EoUowing the... 

The use of the computer in the design of chemical processes requires a framework for depiction and computation completely different from that of traditional CAD/CAM appHcations. Eor this reason, most practitioners use computer-aided process design to designate those approaches that are used to model the performance of individual unit operations, to compute heat and material balances, and to perform thermodynamic and transport analyses. Typical process simulators have, at their core, techniques for the management of massive arrays of data, computational engines to solve sparse matrices, and unit-operation-specific computational subroutines. 

Earhest simulators determined the sequence of the calculations for the vatious unit operations from the expHcit iaput from the engineer or from the sequeace ia which the topological information about unit operations was entered. AH simulators today analyze the topology automatically and determine the sequence. Most of them, however, allow the user to alter this sequence through various techniques of creating hypothetical calculation units of convergence, recycle, and control blocks or units. 

Steps 6 and 7 ate involved with inputting additional specifications about the process being simulated. It is necessary to give an adequate number of specifications for each unit operation, for each calculation unit, and for the overall process flow so that all the degrees of freedom ate taken away and a unique solution can be obtained from the simulator. On the other hand, if mote than the necessary number of specifications ate given, the problem becomes overconstrained for the simulator and no solution can exist. 

Equations-Oriented Simulators. In contrast to the sequential-modular simulators that handle the calculations of each unit operation as an iaput—output module, the equations-oriented simulators treat all the material and energy balance equations that arise ia all the unit operations of the process dow sheet as one set of simultaneous equations. In some cases, the physical properties estimation equations also are iacluded as additional equations ia this set of simultaneous equations. 

The essential differences between sequential-modular and equation-oriented simulators are ia the stmcture of the computer programs (5) and ia the computer time that is required ia getting the solution to a problem. In sequential-modular simulators, at the top level, the executive program accepts iaput data, determines the dow-sheet topology, and derives and controls the calculation sequence for the unit operations ia the dow sheet. The executive then passes control to the unit operations level for the execution of each module. Here, specialized procedures for the unit operations Hbrary calculate mass and energy balances for a particular unit. FiaaHy, the executive and the unit operations level make frequent calls to the physical properties Hbrary level for the routine tasks, enthalpy calculations, and calculations of phase equiHbria and other stream properties. The bottom layer is usually transparent to the user, although it may take 60 to 80% of the calculation efforts. 

A wide array of general-purpose distillation packages are available to the engineer. Some of the distillation software is stand-alone, whereas other packages are a part of a general-purpose flow sheet or process-simulation system. Because distillation is so universal, all process simulators have one or more distillation program modules for this unit operation. Often the nature of the distillation modules determines the suitabiUty of or the preference for the use of a specific simulator for an appHcation. 

As with troubleshooting, parameter estimation is not an exact science. The facade of statistical and mathematical routines coupled with sophisticated simulation models masks the underlying uncertainties in the measurements and the models. It must be understood that the resultant parameter values embody all of the uncertainties in the measurements, underlying database, and the model. The impact of these uncertainties can be minimized by exercising sound engineering judgment founded upon a famiharity with unit operation and engineering fundamentals. 

Catalytic crackings operations have been simulated by mathematical models, with the aid of computers. The computer programs are the end result of a very extensive research effort in pilot and bench scale units. Many sets of calculations are carried out to optimize design of new units, operation of existing plants, choice of feedstocks, and other variables subject to control. A background knowledge of the correlations used in the "black box" helps to make such studies more effective. 

Example 11.7 hints at the complications that are possible in reactive gas absorption. Gas absorption is an important unit operation that has been the subject of extensive research and development. Large, proprietary computer codes are available for purchase, and process simulation tools such as Aspen can do the job. However, as shown in Example 11.8, simple but useful approximations are sometimes possible. 

In a preliminary study, Tomasula et al. (2009) simulated the fluid milk process to identify energy usage and GHGs associated with HTST pasteurization and the related unit operations, such as homogenization. Physical property data for milk and cream were provided to the simulator. Packaging was not included as part of the simulation. GHGs were... 

In an equation based simulators the executive program sets up the flow-sheet and the set of equations that describe the unit operations, and then solves the equations taking data from the unit operations library and physical property data bank and the file of thermodynamic sub-routines. 

The structure of the recipes and the parameters of the unit operations (heating power, cooling power, mass flows, etc.) were taken from the process description and had to be slightly adapted during the first simulation runs. 

Each chapter presents several detailed studies illustrating the application of various optimization techniques. The following matrix shows the classification of the examples with respect to specific techniques. Truly optimal design of process plants cannot be performed by considering each unit operation separately. Hence, in Chapter 15 we discuss the optimization of large-scale plants, including those represented by flowsheet simulators. 

Steady-state process simulation or process flowsheeting has become a routine activity for process analysis and design. Such systems allow the development of comprehensive, detailed, and complex process models with relatively little effort. Embedded within these simulators are rigorous unit operations models often derived from first principles, extensive physical property models for the accurate description of a wide variety of chemical systems, and powerful algorithms for the solution of large, nonlinear systems of equations. 

The older modular simulation mode, on the other hand, is more common in commerical applications. Here process equations are organized within their particular unit operation. Solution methods that apply to a particular unit operation solve the unit model and pass the resulting stream information to the next unit. Thus, the unit operation represents a procedure or module in the overall flowsheet calculation. These calculations continue from unit to unit, with recycle streams in the process updated and converged with new unit information. Consequently, the flow of information in the simulation systems is often analogous to the flow of material in the actual process. Unlike equation-oriented simulators, modular simulators solve smaller sets of equations, and the solution procedure can be tailored for the particular unit operation. However, because the equations are embedded within procedures, it becomes difficult to provide problem specifications where the information flow does not parallel that of the flowsheet. The earliest modular simulators (the sequential modular type) accommodated these specifications, as well as complex recycle loops, through inefficient iterative procedures. The more recent simultaneous modular simulators now have efficient convergence capabilities for handling multiple recycles and nonconventional problem specifications in a coordinated manner. 

Modular simulators are frequently constructed on three levels. The lowest level consists of thermodynamics and other physical property relations that are accessed frequently for a large number of flowsheeting utilities (flash calculations, enthalpy balances, etc.). The next level consists of unit operations models as described above. The highest level then deals with the sequencing and convergence of the flowsheet models. Here, simultaneous... 

In steady-state FCC operation with heavy cycle oil (HCO) recycling, it is conceivable that some hydrocarbon molecules could go through the riser multiple times. We developed a two-pass scheme that combines the Davison circulation riser (DCR) and advanced cracking evaluation (ACE) unit to simulate the recycling operation. 

Despite our personal skepticism, a sample of / was obtained (8) and tested in a bench test unit that simulates continuous vapor stripped reactor operation (9). The... 

PQ is intended to demonstrate that the process will function correctly in its normal operating environment. The demonstration may involve pilot lots, commercial-scale lots, or carefully designed simulations of either. In the case of drug substances, PQ protocols often involve individual modules (e.g., steps, unit operations) of a new process prior to pilot or commercial scale-up of the full process. When a given critical process parameter cannot be simulated at less than commercial scale, all other process parameters are often established first, to avoid potential interference with the first commercial batch that must involve the sensitive parameter. The three full-size lots required to authorize commercial distribution can, if desired, represent key PQ experiments however, there is no limit to the number of subsequent commercial lots that can also continue to be considered part of the PQ step in a validation life cycle. 

The principle of integral process development [26] covers much more than just the optimization of a process. This approach begins with computer-aided decision procedures in the conception phase. Tools are available in which the process structure is suggested, for example should the process be a batch or a continuous operation The software tool for process synthesis PROSYN uses databases which include knowledge of experts, material data and calculation models for unit operations. Interfaces to process simulation tools such as ASPENPLUS and material databases are also supplied. PROSYN also delivers an economic evaluation of the future production process. 

---