Enthalpy, calculation

As we mentioned, it is necessary to have information about the standard enthalpy change for a reaction as well as the standard entropies of the reactants and products to calculate the change in Gibbs function. At some temperature T, A// j can be obtained from Af/Z of each of the substances involved in the transformation. Data on the standard enthalpies of formation are tabulated in either of two ways. One method is to list Af/Z at some convenient temperature, such as 25°C, or at a series of temperatures. Tables 4.2 through 4.5 contain values of AfZ/ at 298.15 K. Values at temperatures not listed are calculated with the aid of heat capacity equations, whose coefficients are given in Table 4.8. 

On the basis of statistical thermodynamics, another method of tabulation, using or (H t- h o)/T, or (H t - H 29. is)/T, in which the subscripts refer to the Kelvin temperatures, has come into general use. This method of 

The following procedure is used to calculate ISyMm at any temperature T from Table 12.2. Data in Tables 12.1 and 12.3 are different only in the reference temperature. The standard enthalpy of formation of a compound C refers to the reaction 

Substance AfFSi298.15 / (JmoF K ) 77m298 Ffmo/ (JmoF K ) 400 K 600 K 800 K 1000K 1500K  

The sum of the following equations gives the required Af// in terms of the functions 

In this section, we present calculations of the enthalpy change in one-component systems for various changes of state from an initial equilibrium state to a final equilibrium state. Since enthalpy is a function of state, its change is independent of the path and depends only 

If phase boundaries are traversed along the path (Fig. 3-2), integration of Eq. (3-32) yields 

The superscripts (1) and (2) refer to the phases illustrated in Fig. 3-2 and is the enthalpy change at pressure and temperature 

Thus we can calculate the enthalpy of a pure chemical component in an arbitrary state from experimental data on calorimetry and the equation 

---

To illustrate the enthalpy calculations outlined above, Figures 1, 2, and 3 present calculated enthalpies for three binary systems. 

Finally, Table 2 shows enthalpy calculations for the system nitrogen-water at 100 atm. in the range 313.5-584.7°K. [See also Figure (4-13).] The mole fraction of nitrogen in the liquid phase is small throughout, but that in the vapor phase varies from essentially unity at the low-temperature end to zero at the high-temperature end. In the liquid phase, the enthalpy is determined primarily by the temperature, but in the vapor phase it is determined by both temperature and composition. 

The computation of pure-component and mixture enthalpies is implemented by FORTRAN IV subroutine ENTH, which evaluates the liquid- or vapor-phase molar enthalpy for a system of up to 20 components at specified temperature, pressure, and composition. The enthalpies calculated are in J/mol referred to the ideal gas at 300°K. Liquid enthalpies can be determined either with... 

The essential differences between sequential-modular and equation-oriented simulators are ia the stmcture of the computer programs (5) and ia the computer time that is required ia getting the solution to a problem. In sequential-modular simulators, at the top level, the executive program accepts iaput data, determines the dow-sheet topology, and derives and controls the calculation sequence for the unit operations ia the dow sheet. The executive then passes control to the unit operations level for the execution of each module. Here, specialized procedures for the unit operations Hbrary calculate mass and energy balances for a particular unit. FiaaHy, the executive and the unit operations level make frequent calls to the physical properties Hbrary level for the routine tasks, enthalpy calculations, and calculations of phase equiHbria and other stream properties. The bottom layer is usually transparent to the user, although it may take 60 to 80% of the calculation efforts. 

There is a lively controversy concerning the interpretation of these and other properties, and cogent arguments have been advanced both for the presence of hydride ions H" and for the presence of protons H+ in the d-block and f-block hydride phases.These difficulties emphasize again the problems attending any classification based on presumed bond type, and a phenomenological approach which describes the observed properties is a sounder initial basis for discussion. Thus the predominantly ionic nature of a phase cannot safely be inferred either from crystal structure or from calculated lattice energies since many metallic alloys adopt the NaCl-type or CsCl-type structures (e.g. LaBi, )S-brass) and enthalpy calculations are notoriously insensitive to bond type. 

Note that the heat content of the strong aqua in, item (2), is used for enthalpy calculations only. It is accidental that the strong aqua enthalpy is 0 in this case). 

Equations 13.16 to 13.18 give the enthalpy in terms of the temperature and humidity of the humid gas for the three conditions 0 = 0a, 0 > 0O, and 0 <0a respectively. Thus, given the percentage humidity and the temperature, the humidity may be obtained from Figure 13.4, the enthalpy calculated from equations 13.16, 13.17 or 13.18 and plotted against the humidity, usually with enthalpy as the abscissa. Such a plot is shown in Figure 13.7 for the air-water system, which includes the curves for 100 per cent humidity and for some lower value, say Z per cent. 

Draw the Lewis structure for the hypothetical molecule N6, consisting of a six-membered ring of nitrogen atoms. Using bond enthalpies, calculate the enthalpy of reaction for the decomposition of N6 to N2(g). Do you expect N6 to be a stable molecule ... 

The values of the apparent rate constants kj for each temperature and the activation enthalpies calculated using the Eyring equation (ref. 21) are summarized in Table 10. However, these values of activation enthalpies are only approximative ones because of the applied simplification and the great range of experimental errors. Activation entropies were not calculated in the lack of absolute rate constants. Presuming the likely first order with respect to 3-bromoflavanones, as well, approximative activation entropies would be between -24 and -30 e.u. for la -> Ih reaction, between -40 and - 45 e.u. for the Ih la reaction and between -33 and -38 e.u. for the elimination step. These activation parameters are in accordance with the mechanisms proposed above. 

Critique the enthalpy calculation in the alternative solution of Example 7.16 that is based on Equation (7.45) rather than Equation (7.42). 

A few compounds wili be chosen to test the method with various types of structures. Compounds wiil be chosen for which enthalpy can, for the purpose of comparison, be found in the tables and the enthalpy calculated in the liquid state oniy when this value is needed to be known. 

All the steam is assumed to condense during the heating period, therefore the steam efficiency, E, equals 1. The standard state for enthalpy calculations is considered to be that of the pure liquid components at 0°C and 1 atm. 

In open rod bundles, transverse flow between subchannels is detectable by variations in hydraulic conditions, such as the difference in equivalent diameter in rod and shroud areas (Green et al., 1962 Chelemer et al., 1972 Rouhani, 1973). The quality of the crossflow may be somewhat higher than that of the main stream (Madden, 1968). However, in view of the small size of the crossflow under most circumstances, such variation generally will not lead to major error in enthalpy calculations. The homogeneous flow approximation almost universally used in subchannel calculations appears to be reasonable (Weisman, 1973). The flow redistribution has a negligible effect on the axial pressure drop. 

So far we have not touched on the fact that the important topic of solvation energy is not yet taken into account. The extent to which solvation influences gas-phase energy values can be considerable. As an example, gas-phase data for fundamental enolisation reactions are included in Table 1. Related aqueous solution phase data can be derived from equilibrium constants 31). The gas-phase heats of enolisation for acetone and propionaldehyde are 19.5 and 13 keal/mol, respectively. The corresponding free energies of enolisation in solution are 9.9 and 5.4 kcal/mol. (Whether the difference between gas and solution derives from enthalpy or entropy effects is irrelevant at this stage.) Despite this, our experience with gas-phase enthalpies calculated by the methods described in this chapter leads us to believe that even the current approach is most valuable for evaluation of reactivity. 

Robinson and Baker,18 and Wai and Yates 19 below 71 wt% they can be converted to other temperatures using partial molal enthalpies calculated from the relative enthalpies given by Bidinosti and Biermann.47 Similar values for HC1 in Tables 7 and 8 are obtained from Randall and Young48 and Akerlof and Teare,49 quoted by Bunnett,50 and can be converted to other temperatures using coefficients supplied by Liu and Gren.51 The author uses computer programs, written in Microsoft Basic for the Macintosh, that compute these quantities and others. 

The reaction favours the formation of ozone with a significant equilibrium constant. Appendix C also lists the enthalpies of formation and the standard enthalpy of the reaction ArH° can be calculated. The answer for the enthalpy calculation is ArH° = —106.47 kJ mol, showing this to be an exothermic reaction, liberating heat. The entropy change at 298 K can also be calculated because ArG° = ArH° — T ArS°, so ArS° = 25.4 Jmol-1 K-1, indicating an increase in the entropy of the reaction as it proceeds by creating one molecule from two. 

FIGURE 22.5 The potential profiles along the MEP of a series of reactions in which the member processes are distinguished by the reaction enthalpy, calculated from Equation 22.9 with p— 1.8. 

The different solvation energetics of R and R- will also lead to errors in the bond dissociation enthalpies calculated with equation 16.33. For instance, in the case of phenol, whose interactions with proton-acceptor solvents (like DMSO) are obviously stronger than those for the phenoxy radical, a negative correction should be applied to the value of Z)//°(PhO-H) calculated from equation 16.33 (see also equation 16.32). It is probably unwise to ascribe the 7 kJ mol-1 difference between the electrochemical and the recommended DH° (PhO—R) value to the differential solvation effects. Although this discrepancy is in the correct direction, it lies within the suggested uncertainty of the method. 

Essentially all of the engineering thermodynamic correlations used in pollution control models and synthesis gas phase equilibria, chemical equilibria, and enthalpy calculation schemes have their foundations in fundamental theory. Experimental data, in addition to being directly useful to designers, allows the correlation developer to assess the validity and suitability of his model. Included within the third section (Properties of Aqueous Solutions—Theory, Experiment, and Prediction) are chapters providing both comprehensive reviews and detailed descriptions of specific areas of concern in the theory and properties of aqueous solutions. 

---