Ultraviolet spectroscopy detector

EC = electrical conductivity detector ECD = electron capture detector FPD = flame photometric detector GC = gas chromatography HPLC = high performance liquid chromatography NPD = nitrogen phosphorus detector TID = thermionic detector UV = ultraviolet spectroscopy... 

Ultraviolet spectroscopy is not as useful in detecting the -NC function. Despite its limitation, coeluting isothiocyano compounds are UV active ( 250 nm, e 1200) [27c]. Thus, a UV monitor can be interfaced with an LH-20 or silica column to detect column fractions containing -NCS compounds. Final resolution of enriched mixtures of previously fractionated isonitrile-related compounds is achieved by examining the responses generated by UV and RI detectors coupled in liquid chromatography. 

The most commonly-used detectors are those based on spectrophotometry in the region 184-400nm, visible ultraviolet spectroscopy in the region 185-900nm, post-column derivativisation with fluorescence detection (see below), conductivity and those based on the relatively new technique of multiple wavelength ultraviolet detectors using a diode array system detector (described below). Other types of detectors available are those based on electrochemical principles, refractive index, differential viscosity and mass detection. 

With respect to chromatography, electrochemical detection means amperometric detection. Amper-ometry is the measurement of electrolysis current versus time at a controlled electrode potential. It has a relationship to voltammetry similar to the relationship of an ultraviolet (UV) detector to spectroscopy. Whereas conductometric detection is used in ion chromatography, potentiometric detection is never used in routine practice. Electrochemical detection has even been used in gas chromatography in a few unusual circumstances. It has even been attempted with thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Its practical success has only been with liquid chromatography (LC) and that will be the focus here. 

Whilst spectroscopy techniques can be used on their own to obtain spectral information about a sample they are also commonly incorporated as a detector as part of another technique, for example the use of an ultraviolet absorbance detector as part of a liquid chromatography system. In recent years there has been much enthusiasm for the research and development of hyphenated techniques, that is the interfacing/linking together of two or more techniques, because of the enhanced additional data that can be generated. 

In this regard, various analytical methods have been developed and their potential for the VOO authentication has been evaluated. Thus, spectroscopic tools, such as FT-near-infrared spectroscopy, FT-Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence and ultraviolet-visible detectors, and chromatographic techniques have been widely used in the field of VOO authentication [43-48],... 

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. Mercury, separated from a measured sample, may be passed as vapor iato a closed system between an ultraviolet lamp and a photocell detector or iato the light path of an atomic absorption spectrometer. Ground-state atoms ia the vapor attenuate the light decreasiag the current output of the photocell ia an amount proportional to the concentration of the mercury. The light absorption can be measured at 253.7 nm and compared to estabUshed caUbrated standards (21). A mercury concentration of 0.1 ppb can be measured by atomic absorption. 

For characterization purposes of bulk or thin-film semiconductors the features at Eq and E] are the most useflil. In a number of technologically important semiconductors (e.g., Hgi j d Te, and In Gai j ) the value of. ) is so small that it is not in a convenient spectral range for Modulation Spectroscopy, due to the limitations of light sources and detectors. In such cases the peak at E can be used. The features at Eq and are not useflil since they occur too far into the near-ultraviolet and are too broad. 

The most basic method for the determination of the methylxanthines is ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy. In fact, many of the HPLC detectors that will be mentioned use spectroscopic methods of detection. The sample must be totally dissolved and particle-free prior to final analysis. Samples containing more than one component can necessitate the use of extensive clean-up procedures, ajudicious choice of wavelength, the use of derivative spectroscopy, or some other mathematical manipulation to arrive at a final analytical measurement. A recent book by Wilson has a chapter on the analysis of foods using UV spectroscopy and can be used as a suitable reference for those interested in learning more about this topic.1... 

The phenomenon of fluorescence has been synonymous with ultraviolet (UV) and visible spectroscopy rather than near-infrared (near-IR) spectroscopy from the beginning of the subject. This fact is evidenced in definitive texts which also provide useful background information for this volume (see, e.g., Refs. 1-6). Consequently, our understanding of the many molecular phenomena which can be studied with fluorescence techniques, e.g., excimer formation, energy transfer, diffusion, and rotation, is based on measurements made in the UV/visible. Historically, this emphasis was undoubtedly due to the spectral response of the eye and the availability of suitable sources and detectors for the UV/visible in contrast to the lack of equivalent instrumentation for the IR. Nevertheless, there are a few notable exceptions to the prevalence of UV/visible techniques in fluorescence such as the near-IR study of chlorophyll(7) and singlet oxygen,<8) which have been ongoing for some years. 

The use of ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy for on-line analysis is a relatively recent development. Previously, on-line analysis in the UV-visible (UV-vis) region of the electromagnetic spectrum was limited to visible light applications such as color measurement, or chemical concentration measurements made with filter photometers. Three advances of the past two decades have propelled UV spectroscopy into the realm of on-line measurement and opened up a variety of new applications for both on-line UV and visible spectroscopy. These advances are high-quality UV-grade optical fiber, sensitive and affordable array detectors, and chemometrics. 

The frequencies of interest for studies of collision-induced absorption range from microwave frequencies to the ultraviolet, depending on the systems and specific transitions considered. Light sources, monochromators, detectors and pressure cells are needed for such studies, which are more or less the same as in the conventional spectroscopies. 

Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometric detectors are used to monitor chromatographic separations. However, this type of detection offers very little specificity. Element specific detectors are much more useful and important. Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICPAES) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) are often used in current studies. The highest sensitivity is achieved by graphite furnace-AAS and ICP-MS. The former is used off-line while the latter is coupled to the chromatographic column and is used on-line . 

Well-monochromatized X-ray sources and good detectors now even allow measurements of the shift in photoelectron energy caused by the valence electrons this valence state spectroscopy was done (1965-1990) with an ultraviolet energy source in place of the X-ray source (UPS, or ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy) now XPS instruments can provide the same valence state chemical information by using X-ray excitation. 

---