Visible techniques

It is a visible technique and hence there are no problems arising from light absorption by the supernatant electrolyte. 

The phenomenon of fluorescence has been synonymous with ultraviolet (UV) and visible spectroscopy rather than near-infrared (near-IR) spectroscopy from the beginning of the subject. This fact is evidenced in definitive texts which also provide useful background information for this volume (see, e.g., Refs. 1-6). Consequently, our understanding of the many molecular phenomena which can be studied with fluorescence techniques, e.g., excimer formation, energy transfer, diffusion, and rotation, is based on measurements made in the UV/visible. Historically, this emphasis was undoubtedly due to the spectral response of the eye and the availability of suitable sources and detectors for the UV/visible in contrast to the lack of equivalent instrumentation for the IR. Nevertheless, there are a few notable exceptions to the prevalence of UV/visible techniques in fluorescence such as the near-IR study of chlorophyll(7) and singlet oxygen,<8) which have been ongoing for some years. 

NMR and UV-visible techniques have been used in the characterization of intermediates in the [Fe (edta)]" -promoted decomposition of hydrogen peroxide7 Fe complexes of edta, nta, and dtpa react with FISOs by an inner-sphere one-electron transfer mechanism with transient production of S04, in contrast to Cu, which reacts by an outer-sphere mechanism to give S04 and hydroxy radicalsFe -edta redox properties are relevant to Fe /Cu /H202 systems. ... 

Comparison of the Visibility/Interferometer Techniqiie with the MgO Collection Technique. During one experiment, using kerosene as the primary fiuid, a MgO-coated microscope slide was used to collect droplets 40 in. from the nozzle. The impressions formed by the droplets in the MgO were then viewed and sized using an optical microscope. During the same experiment and at the same location, drop sizes were measured using the visibility technique. One hundred drops were analyzed using each technique, and comparisons were drawn. 

In comparing the two methods, the angle technique requires a less elaborate laboratory setup however, the additional amount of time and effort involved in data reduction, especially for droplets larger than 10 fim, makes this technique much less desirable than the real-time visibility technique. Furthermore, unlike the visibility technique, the Mie scattering technique gives only a mean size rather than a complete size distribution. 

In Situ Techniques 3.2.5.2.1 Optical Techniques UV-visible Techniques... 

UV-visible techniques were proven usefiil, they are not suitable for identifying adsorbates or orientation of adsorbates. This type of information could be provided by the various versions of vibrational spectroscopy. 

I will present hae the studies of KsMoCle and CrCls -LiCl-KCl electrolytes whae both electrochemical and UV-Visible techniques are used. 

Whilst UV-visible techniques have proved extremely useful, they unfortunately lack molecular specificity. This means that they are not suitable for identifying adsorbates or studying adsorbate orientation and local environment. This type of information is best provided by vibrational spectroscopy, and therefore a considerable effort has been expended in developing vibrational spectroscopies that can be used in situ in an electrochemical cell. This effort is beginning to pay off, and techniques based on both infrared spectroscopy and Raman scattering spectroscopy are being increasingly used. 

Most of the existing work concerning the structure of organic anions in solution has been performed with carbanions, enolates and fenoxi-des2y ketyls and semiquinone derivatives, such studies were based principally on ESR, NMR and UV-visible techniques, and in particular the latter have been limited to very dilute solutions in a narrow range of concentrations, due to the very high molar extinction coefficient of the anions. 

---