Transduction taste perception

It has been proposed " that the mechanism(s) of action of gymnemic acids and ziziphins is a biphasic, model-membrane penetration-process. The model suggested that the modifier molecules interact first with the receptor-cell plasma-membrane surface. It was postulated that this initial interaction involves a selective effect on taste perception, including the transduction and quality specification of the sweet stimuli, and selective depression of sweetness perception. Following the initial interaction, the modifier molecules interact with the membrane-lipid interior to produce a general disruption of membrane function and a nonselective effect on taste... 

In contrast to visual perception, where the sole stimulus is a photon, and even in contrast to olfaction with its structurally much more diversified stimuli, taste perception is exceptional, because the taste stimuli differ even more than odorants in size and chemical complexity, ranging from H+ ions to carbohydrates, amino adds, and proteins. Consequently, taste transduction mi t involve different mechanisms for different stimuli. In the ihesus monkey, taste reception has been located anatomically to defined loci at either the anterior or the posterior part of the tongue. 

Bitter taste is elicited by structurally diverse compounds, including phenols, ions, amino acids and peptides, alkaloids, acylated sugars, glycosides, nitrogenous compounds, and thiocarbamates. Taste receptor cells are primarily associated with papillae on the tongue. The signal transduction mechanisms by which taste perception occurs are well not understood, but are the focus of intensive research as reviewed recently (6). 

The aroma of fmit, the taste of candy, and the texture of bread are examples of flavor perception. In each case, physical and chemical stmctures ia these foods stimulate receptors ia the nose and mouth. Impulses from these receptors are then processed iato perceptions of flavor by the brain. Attention, emotion, memory, cognition, and other brain functions combine with these perceptions to cause behavior, eg, a sense of pleasure, a memory, an idea, a fantasy, a purchase. These are psychological processes and as such have all the complexities of the human mind. Flavor characterization attempts to define what causes flavor and to determine if human response to flavor can be predicted. The ways ia which simple flavor active substances, flavorants, produce perceptions are described both ia terms of the physiology, ie, transduction, and psychophysics, ie, dose-response relationships, of flavor (1,2). Progress has been made ia understanding how perceptions of simple flavorants are processed iato hedonic behavior, ie, degree of liking, or concept formation, eg, crispy or umami (savory) (3,4). However, it is unclear how complex mixtures of flavorants are perceived or what behavior they cause. Flavor characterization involves the chemical measurement of iadividual flavorants and the use of sensory tests to determine their impact on behavior. 

The perception of flavor is a fine balance between the sensory input of both desirable and undesirable flavors. It involves a complex series of biochemical and physiological reactions that occur at the cellular and subcellular level (see Chapters 1-3). Final sensory perception or response to the food is regulated by the action and interaction of flavor compounds and their products on two neur networks, the olfactory and gustatory systems or the smell and taste systems, respectively (Figure 1). The major food flavor components involved in the initiation and transduction of the flavor response are the food s lipids, carbohydrates, and proteins, as well as their reaction products. Since proteins and peptides of meat constitute the major chemical components of muscle foods, they will be the major focus of discussion in this chapter. 

Taste transduaion is initiated when taste stimuli interact with exposed cells in the apical microvilli of the tongue. The receptor-ligand interaction leads to membrane depolarization and to activation of afferent gustatory neurons. The perception of the common human taste qualities— sweet, bitter, salty, and sour—has been assigned to groups of taste neurons. But a characteristic property of taste transduction is that the taste cells can also be stimulated directly without the intervention of receptors. 

Do these diverse compounds give rise to a common perception of sweetness or to qualitatively different sensations Sweetness does indeed appear to be a unitary percept (Breslin et al. 1994,1996). However, some sweeteners may be discriminable on the basis of their activation of other sensory transduction mechanisms or differences in the temporal properties of their sensory action. For example, the sweetener sodium saccharin activates bitter receptors in some people (Kuhn et al. 2004 Pronin et al. 2007), and also inhibits sweet taste at high concentrations (Galindo-Cuspinera et al. 2006). Sweet proteins such as thaumatin and monellin can have a slow onset or evoke a prolonged sweetness compared with sugars (Faus 2000), likely owing to a relatively high affinity for the sweet taste receptor. 

How do our sensory systems work How are the initial stimuli detected How are these initial biochemical events transformed into perceptions and experiences We have already encountered systems that sense and respond to chemical signals—namely, receptors that bind to growth factors and hormones. Our knowledge of these receptors and their associated signal-transduction pathways provides us with concepts and tools for unraveling some of the workings of sensory systems. For example, 7TM receptors (seven-transmembrane receptors. Section 14.1) play key roles in olfaction, taste, and vision. Ion channels that are sensitive to mechanical stress are essential for hearing and touch. 

In taste studies, sucrose is usually taken as a reference standard in the sensory evaluation of sweetness and caffeine is generally used as the reference material for bitterness. However, sour and salty tastants modulate taste-receptor function by direct effect on specific ion channels in the membrane, while sweet and bitter tasting compounds seem to bind to closely located receptors which are coupled to a guanidine-nucleotide binding protein (G-protein). The perception of their tastes proceeds through a transduction mechanism involving G-protein and a second messenger system (Kinnamon, 1988). 

---