Salty tastant

Salty tastants act directly on Na+ channels in the PM of cells on the tongue surface. Direct passage of Na+ through these channels causes depolarization and thence signalling to the CNS. Much (but not all) salt taste perception is inhibited by the voltage-sensitive Na+ channel inhibitor amiloride (see Chapter 4) and evidently some salt perception also occurs via amiloride-insensitive channels. 

Salty tastants are not detected by 7TM receptors. Rather, they are detected directly by their passage through ion channels expressed on the surface of cells in the tongue. Evidence for the role of these ion channels comes from examining known properties of sodium channels characterized in other biological contexts. One class of channels, characterized first for their role in salt reabsorption, are thought to be important in salt taste detection because they are sensitive to the compound amiloride, which mutes the taste of salt and significantly lowers sensory neuron activation in response to sodium. 

In taste studies, sucrose is usually taken as a reference standard in the sensory evaluation of sweetness and caffeine is generally used as the reference material for bitterness. However, sour and salty tastants modulate taste-receptor function by direct effect on specific ion channels in the membrane, while sweet and bitter tasting compounds seem to bind to closely located receptors which are coupled to a guanidine-nucleotide binding protein (G-protein). The perception of their tastes proceeds through a transduction mechanism involving G-protein and a second messenger system (Kinnamon, 1988). 

After the saliva has carried the tastants into the taste bud, they interact with the taste receptors on the surface of the cells, or with ion channels, which are pore-like proteins. Salty and sour tastants act through ion channels, and sweet and bitter sensations are mediated by surface receptors. The different taste submodalities rely on specific mechanisms Na+ flux through Na+... 

Odorants and tastants in foods interact in complicated ways. For instance, strawberry odor enhances the sweetness of whipped cream, while peanut butter odor does not, and strawberry odor did not enhance the saltiness of sodium chloride (Frank and Byram, 1988). 

The simplest tastant, the hydrogen ion, is perceived as sour. Other simple ions, particularly sodium ion, are perceived as salty. The taste called umami is evoked by the amino acid glutamate, often encountered as the flavor enhancer monosodium glutamate (MSG). In contrast, tastants perceived as bitter or sweet are extremely diverse. Many bitter compounds are alkaloids or other plant products of which many are toxic. However, they do not have any common structural elements or other common properties. Carbohydrates such as glucose and sucrose are perceived as sweet, as are other compounds including some simple peptide derivatives, such as aspartame, and even some proteins. 

Figure 32.11. Examples of Tastant Molecules. Tastants fall into five groups sweet, salty, umami, bitter, and sour.

Many microbial metabolites are volatile compounds and in terms of their sensory properties can be broken into two broad categories odorants and tastants (Table 1). Tastants include salty, sour, sweet, and bitter compounds such as amino acids, peptides, and sugars. Primary odorants typically are quite volatile and include carbonyl compounds, esters, and terpenes. There is considerable overlap between the two categories lactones, for example, have both taste and odor properties. In keeping with the theme of this symposium, volatile aroma substances will be the primary focus. 

---