Three phase fluidized bed

Three-phase fluidized bed reactors are used for the treatment of heavy petroleum fractions at 350 to 600°C (662 to 1,112°F) and 200 atm (2,940 psi). A biological treatment process (Dorr-Oliver Hy-Flo) employs a vertical column filled with sand on which bacderial growth takes place while waste liquid and air are charged. A large interfacial area for reaction is provided, about 33 cmVcm (84 inVirr), so that an 85 to 90 percent BOD removal in 15 min is claimed compared with 6 to 8 h in conventional units. 

Hydrodynamics, Heat and Mass Transfer in Inverse and Circulating Three-Phase Fluidized-Bed Reactors for WasteWater Treatment... 

Recent research development of hydrodynamics and heat and mass transfer in inverse and circulating three-phase fluidized beds for waste water treatment is summarized. The three-phase (gas-liquid-solid) fluidized bed can be utilized for catalytic and photo-catalytic gas-liquid reactions such as chemical, biochemical, biofilm and electrode reactions. For the more effective treatment of wastewater, recently, new processing modes such as the inverse and circulation fluidization have been developed and adopted to circumvent the conventional three-phase fluidized bed reactors [1-6]. 

To provide the pr equisite knowledge for designing the three-phase fluidized-bed reactors with new modes, the hydrodynamics such as phase holdup, mixing and bubble properties and heat and mass transfer characteristics in the reactors have to be determined. Thus, in this study, the hydrodynamics and heat and mass transfer characteristics in the inverse and circulating three-phase fluidized-bed reactors for wastewater treatment in the present and previous studies have been summarized. Correlations for the hydrod3aiamics as well as mass and heat transfer coefficients are proposed. The areas wherein future research should be undertaken to improve... 

Bavarian and Fan [3, 4] reported a similar phenomenon occurring in a three-phase fluidized bed. In their case, the hydraulic transport of a packed bed occurred at the start-up of a gas-liquid-solid fluidized bed. Although the cause was different from the case reported in the present study, similar phenomena were observed in both cases. 

The term three-phase fluidization, in this chapter, is taken as a system consisting of a gas, liquid, and solid phase, wherein the solid phase is in a non-stationary state, and includes three-phase slurry bubble columns, three-phase fluidized beds, and three-phase flotation columns, but excludes three-phase fixed bed systems. The individual phases in three-phase fluidization systems can be reactants, products, catalysts, or inert. For example, in the hydrotreating of light gas oils, the solid phase is catalyst, and the liquid and gas phases are either reactants or products in the bleaching of paper pulp, the solid phase is both reactant and product, and the gas phase is a reactant while the liquid phase is inert in anaerobic fermentation, the gas phase results from the biological activity, the liquid phase is product, and the solid is either a biological carrier or the microorganism itself. 

The development of three-phase reactor technologies in the 1970 s saw renewed interest in the synthetic fuel area due to the energy crisis of 1973. Several processes were developed for direct coal liquefaction using both slurry bubble column reactors (Exxon Donor Solvent process and Solvent Refined Coal process) and three-phase fluidized bed reactors (H-Coal process). These processes were again shelved in the early 1980 s due to the low price of petroleum crudes. 

The 1970 s also brought about increased use of three-phase systems in environmental applications. A three-phase fluidized bed system, known as the Turbulent Bed Contactor, was commercially used in the 1970 s to remove sulfur dioxide and particulates from flue gas generated by coal combustion processes. This wet scrubbing process experienced several... 

The 1980 s and the early 1990 s have seen the blossoming development of the biotechnology field. Three-phase fluidized bed bioreactors have become an essential element in the commercialization of processes to yield products and treat wastewater via biological mechanisms. Fluidized bed bioreactors have been applied in the areas of wastewater treatment, discussed previously, fermentation, and cell culture. The large scale application of three-phase fluidized bed or slurry bubble column fermen-tors are represented by ethanol production in a 10,000 liter fermentor (Samejima et al., 1984), penicillin production in a 200 liter fermentor (Endo et al., 1986), and the production of monoclonal antibodies in a 1,000 liter slurry bubble column bioreactor (Birch et al., 1985). Fan (1989) provides a complete review of biological applications of three-phase fluidized beds up to 1989. Part II of this chapter covers the recent developments in three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor technology. 

New applications and novel reactor configurations or operational modes for three-phase systems are continually being reported. These include the operation of a three-phase fluidized bed in a circulatory mode (Liang et al., 1995), similar to the commonly applied gas-solid circulating fluidized bed the application of a three-phase fluidized bed electrode that can be used as a fuel cell (Tanaka et al., 1990) magnetically stabilized three-phase fluidized beds centrifugal three-phase reactors and airlift reactors. 

This section covers recent advances in the application of three-phase fluidization systems in the petroleum and chemical process industries. These areas encompass many of the important commercial applications of three-phase fluidized beds. The technology for such applications as petroleum resid processing and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis have been successfully demonstrated in plants throughout the world. Overviews and operational considerations for recent improvements in the hydrotreating of petroleum resids, applications in the hydrotreating of light gas-oil, and improvements and new applications in hydrocarbon synthesis will be discussed. 

Table 11. Advantages and Positive Features of Three-Phase Fluidized Bed Bioreactors...

Figure 8. The relationship between biological, hydrodynamic, mixing, and transport phenomena in three-phase fluidized bed bioreactors.

There are a wide variety of three-phase fluidized bioreactor designs possible. The conventional reactor, shown in Fig. 9, is fluidized by both gas and liquid entering at the bottom of the reactor and leaving at the top and is the most common type of three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor. This reactor may be configured to operate with little axial liquid mixing or in a well-mixed mode by adding a recycle stream. The airlift reactor or draft tube fluidized bed reactor, Fig. 10, is also frequently used. In this reactor, gas is injected at the bottom of a draft tube placed in the center of the... 

Figure 9. Conventional three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor.

Table 13. System and Biological Parameters that Affect Three-Phase Fluidized Bed Bioreactor Performance...

Several areas are receiving much of the research attention. Approaches that integrate product recovery with the fermentation in a three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor reflect general research trends in biochemical engineering (Yabannavar and Wang, 1991 Davison and Thompson, 1992). The successful use of three-phase biofluidization has also been demonstrated for recombinant protein systems, where it may have some benefit in improving plasmid stability (Shu and Yang, 1996). 

Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer. Gas-liquid mass transfer within the three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor is dependent on the interfacial area available for mass transfer, a the gas-liquid mass transfer coefficient, kx, and the driving force that results from the concentration difference between the bulk liquid and the bulk gas. The latter can be easily controlled by varying the inlet gas concentration. Because estimations of the interfacial area available for mass transfer depends on somewhat challenging measurements of bubble size and bubble size distribution, much of the research on increasing mass transfer rates has concentrated on increasing the overall mass transfer coefficient, kxa, though several studies look at the influence of various process conditions on the individual parameters. Typical values of kxa reported in the literature are listed in Table 19. 

The use of floating bubble breakers has been used to increase the volumetric mass transfer coefficient in a three-phase fluidized bed of glass beads (Kang et al., 1991) perhaps a similar strategy would prove effective for a bed of low density beads. Static mixers have been shown to increase kxa for otherwise constant process conditions by increasing the gas holdup and, therefore, the interfacial area (Potthoff and Bohnet, 1993). 

Understanding the effect of reactor diameter on the volumetric mass transfer coefficient is critical to successful scale up. In studies of a three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor using soft polyurethane particles, Karamanev et al. (1992) found that for a classical fluidized bed bioreactor, kxa could either increase or decrease with a change in reactor diameter, depending on solids holdup, but for a draft tube fluidized bed bioreactor, kxa always increased with increased reactor diameter. 

The complexity of the three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor is gradually coming under control as more sophisticated models become available. The chief need is for a model that integrates the microbial kinetics with the... 

An example of the application of a unified model to the design of a three-phase, fluidized bed bioreactor is the scale down, scale up procedure. A model of the full scale reactor is developed, then is used to design... 

If substrate inhibition exists, a well-mixed bioreactor is desirable. Mixing in three-phase fluidized bed bioreactors can be increased by adding an external recycle loop, by inserting a draft tube in the reactor, or by decreasing the height to diameter ratio. 

Effluent is drawn off from a side port. Under conditions in which a conventional three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor operated in an unstable manner because of gas logging, the new bioreactor converted glucose to ethanol at a 27% higher rate. Saccharomyces cerevisiae was grown in alginate beads for this reaction. 

---