Technique of Operations Review

Technique of operations review (TOR) was developed by D.A. Weaver of the American Society of Safety Engineers in the early 1970s [13]. In regard to safety, it seeks to highlight systemic causes for the occurrence of an adverse incident rather than assigning blame. Furthermore, the method allows management personnel and workers to work jointly to analyze workplace-related accidents, incidents, and failures. Thus, TOR may simply be described as a hands-on analytical method to highlight the root system causes of an operation failure [13,14]. 

The method makes use of a worksheet containing simple terms that require yes/no decisions and is activated by an adverse incident occurring at a certain location and time involving certain people. It is to be noted that this method is not a hypothetical process and demands a systemic evaluation of the circumstances surrounding the incident in question [12]. Ultimately, TOR highlights how the company/organization could have prevented the occurrence of the accident. 

Step 1 Form the TOR team. This step is concerned with forming a TOR team with members from all concerned areas. 

Step 2 Hold a roundtable session. This step is concerned with holding a roundtable session to impart common knowledge to all members of the TOR team. 

Step 3 Identify one key systemic factor that was instrumental in causing the accident/incident. This step is concerned with identifying one key systemic factor that played an instrumental role in causing the accident/incident. It is to be noted that this factor must be based on all team members consensus and serves as a starting point for further investigation. 

---

Hallock, R.G., Technique of operations review analysis Determines cause of accident/incident. Safety and Health, 60(8), 1991,38-39. 

Chapter 3 presents introductory aspects of safety and reliability. Chapter 4 presents a number of methods considered useful for performing safety and reliability analyses in the oil and gas industry. These methods are root cause analysis, hazard and operability analysis, technique of operations review, interface safety analysis, preliminary hazard analysis, job safety analysis, failure modes and effect analysis, fault tree analysis, and the Markov method. 

The treatment of the two-phase SECM problem applicable to immiscible liquid-liquid systems, requires a consideration of mass transfer in both liquid phases, unless conditions are selected so that the phase that does not contain the tip (denoted as phase 2 throughout this chapter) can be assumed to be maintained at a constant composition. Many SECM experiments on liquid-liquid interfaces have therefore employed much higher concentrations of the reactant of interest in phase 2 compared to the phase containing the tip (phase 1), so that depletion and diffusional effects in phase 2 can be eliminated [18,47,48]. This has the advantage that simpler theoretical treatments can be used, but places obvious limitations on the range of conditions under which reactions can be studied. In this section we review SECM theory appropriate to liquid-liquid interfaces at the full level where there are no restrictions on either the concentrations or diffusion coefficients of the reactants in the two phases. Specific attention is given to SECM feedback [49] and SECMIT [9], which represent the most widely used modes of operation. The extension of the models described to other techniques, such as DPSC, is relatively straightforward. 

An introductory manual that explains the basic concepts of chemistry behind scientific analytical techniques and that reviews their application to archaeology. It explains key terminology, outlines the procedures to be followed in order to produce good data, and describes the function of the basic instrumentation required to carry out those procedures. The manual contains chapters on the basic chemistry and physics necessary to understand the techniques used in analytical chemistry, with more detailed chapters on atomic absorption, inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy, neutron activation analysis, X-ray fluorescence, electron microscopy, infrared and Raman spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. Each chapter describes the operation of the instruments, some hints on the practicalities, and a review of the application of the technique to archaeology, including some case studies. With guides to further reading on the topic, it is an essential tool for practitioners, researchers, and advanced students alike. 

The objectives of each theoretical approach are not only the explanation of the experimental results or failures of practice but also the prediction of new possibilities to increase the sensitivity, separation capacity and velocity of the chromatographic procedure under investigation. Numerous theoretical reviews deal with the problems of the CE separation technique. In recent years the methods to enhance the precision in CE by the modification of operational parameters [113], the theory and methodological improvements of sample stacking of cationic and anionic solutes in CE [114-116], and the results and difficulties of the application of conductivity detection in CE technologies [117] have been reviewed. 

To sum up, the choice of operating conditions for a specific FFF application is made in a way that recalls the general criteria used in chromatography. An accurate search of literature addressed to similar samples that have been already analyzed by FFF techniques is very useful. A number of specific reviews have been published concerning, for example, enviromnental, pharmaceutical, and biological samples (see Section 12.5). As previously mentioned above, one of the most important factors is the stability of the considered colloidal system, for which a great deal of information can be obtained from specialized literature, such as colloid, polymer, and latex handbooks [33], For example, the use of the proper surfactant (e.g., Fl-70) is common for SdFFF applications. Polymer analysis with ThFFF requires solvent types similar to those employed in size exclusion chromatography. 

Recent developments in the field of sensing airborne chemicals using electrochemical sensors and sensor arrays are reviewed. Such systems detect, Identify, and quantify potential chemical hazards to protect the health and safety of workers and citizens. The application discussed In this review article Is single chemicals at part-per-million levels in air. The sensor system consists of an array of sensors used In four modes of operation, and the data are Interpreted by a computer algorithm. Pattern recognition techniques are being used to understand the information content of the arrays and to focus future experimental work. 

As shown in this review, test equipment integrated with several diagnostic techniques is preferred for a deeper insight into the mechanisms that cause performance losses and spatial non-uniform distribution. As a consequence, more information, which is simultaneously obtained with these diagnostic tools, will strongly support development of empirical models or validate theoretical models predicting performance as a function of operating conditions and fuel cell characteristic properties. 

During an audit ofaproduction and/or packaging operation, one of the most important forms of documentation reviewed will be the batch record. Adherence to cGMPs and SOPs, training of employees, investigations of procedures and techniques, and evaluation of product quality trends can all be reflected by an audit of batch records. Other than internal audits by QA, there are typically two different audits groups that will examine the batch records. 

---