Tank reactor reaction

Figure 7-22. Comparison of stirred tank reactor, plug flow reactor and continuous stirred tank reactor (Reaction S - P asterisks indicate time or position of substrate entering the reactor).

Reductive amination of an conventional stirred tank reactor. Reaction time reduced by a factor of 3 Catalyst loading and reaction time Greenwood (1986)... 

Batch time lowered by a factor of 2 catalyst loading reduced by factor of 2 Solventless system increases productivity as compared to conventional stirred tank reactor. Reaction time reduced by 80% yield increased from 83 to 94% Appropriate design of venturi loop reactor reduces chlorination batch time by a factor of 5-7 from 20 to 40 h required in a conventional stirred tank reactor. Highly efficient heat transfer in the external loop affords nearly isothermal operation at 45-50 °C, resulting in a high yield (more than 90%) of 2,4-dichloro phenol while suppressing formation of 2,6 dichloro phenol. Efficient removal of reaction by-product (hydrogen chloride) in the external gas circuit (Fig. 8.3) improves the yield Almost complete conversion of methanol in less than 1 h... 

In fact, it is often possible with stirred-tank reactors to come close to the idealized well-stirred model in practice, providing the fluid phase is not too viscous. Such reactors should be avoided for some types of parallel reaction systems (see Fig. 2.2) and for all systems in which byproduct formation is via series reactions. 

Reaction conditions depend on the composition of the bauxite ore, and particularly on whether it contains primarily gibbsite, Al(OH)2, or boehmite [1318-23-6] AlOOH. The dissolution process is conducted in large, stirred vessels or alternatively in a tubular reactor. The process originated as a batch process, but has been converted to a continuous one, using a series of stirred tank reactors or a tubular reactor. 

A process based on a nickel catalyst, either supported or Raney type, is described ia Olin Mathieson patents (26,27). The reduction is carried out ia a continuous stirred tank reactor with a concentric filter element built iato the reactor so that the catalyst remains ia the reaction 2one. Methanol is used as a solvent. Reaction conditions are 2.4—3.5 MPa (350—500 psi), 120—140°C. Keeping the catalyst iaside the reactor iacreases catalyst lifetime by maintaining a hydrogen atmosphere on its surface at all times and minimises handling losses. Periodic cleaning of the filter element is required. 

Specific reactor characteristics depend on the particular use of the reactor as a laboratory, pilot plant, or industrial unit. AH reactors have in common selected characteristics of four basic reactor types the weH-stirred batch reactor, the semibatch reactor, the continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor, and the tubular reactor (Fig. 1). A reactor may be represented by or modeled after one or a combination of these. SuitabHity of a model depends on the extent to which the impacts of the reactions, and thermal and transport processes, are predicted for conditions outside of the database used in developing the model (1-4). 

Continuous-flow stirred-tank reactors ia series are simpler and easier to design for isothermal operation than are tubular reactors. Reactions with narrow operating temperature ranges or those requiring close control of reactant concentrations for optimum selectivity benefit from series arrangements. 

In the slurry process, the hydrolysis is accompHshed using two stirred-tank reactors in series (266). Solutions of poly(vinyl acetate) and catalyst are continuously added to the first reactor, where 90% of the conversion occur, and then transferred to the second reactor to reach hiU conversion. Alkyl acetate and alcohols are continuously distilled off in order to drive the equiUbrium of the reaction. The resulting poly(vinyl alcohol) particles tend to be very fine, resulting in a dusty product. The process has been modified to yield a less dusty product through process changes (267,268) and the use of additives (269). Partially hydroly2ed products having a narrow hydrolysis distribution cannot be prepared by this method. 

Over 25 years ago the coking factor of the radiant coil was empirically correlated to operating conditions (48). It has been assumed that the mass transfer of coke precursors from the bulk of the gas to the walls was controlling the rate of deposition (39). Kinetic models (24,49,50) were developed based on the chemical reaction at the wall as a controlling step. Bench-scale data (51—53) appear to indicate that a chemical reaction controls. However, flow regimes of bench-scale reactors are so different from the commercial furnaces that scale-up of bench-scale results caimot be confidently appHed to commercial furnaces. For example. Figure 3 shows the coke deposited on a controlled cylindrical specimen in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and the rate of coke deposition. The deposition rate decreases with time and attains a pseudo steady value. Though this is achieved in a matter of rninutes in bench-scale reactors, it takes a few days in a commercial furnace. 

Experimental data that are most easily obtained are of (C, t), (p, t), (/ t), or (C, T, t). Values of the rate are obtainable directly from measurements on a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR), or they may be obtained from (C, t) data by numerical means, usually by first curve fitting and then differentiating. When other properties are measured to follow the course of reaction—say, conductivity—those measurements are best converted to concentrations before kinetic analysis is started. 

FIG. 23-1 Heat transfer to stirred tank reactors, a) Jacket, (h) Internal coils, (c) Internal tubes, (d) External heat exchanger, (e) External reflux condenser. if) Fired heater. (Walas, Reaction Kinetics for Chemical Engineers, McGraw-Hill, 1959). 

Two complementai y reviews of this subject are by Shah et al. AIChE Journal, 28, 353-379 [1982]) and Deckwer (in de Lasa, ed.. Chemical Reactor Design andTechnology, Martinus Nijhoff, 1985, pp. 411-461). Useful comments are made by Doraiswamy and Sharma (Heterogeneous Reactions, Wiley, 1984). Charpentier (in Gianetto and Silveston, eds.. Multiphase Chemical Reactors, Hemisphere, 1986, pp. 104—151) emphasizes parameters of trickle bed and stirred tank reactors. Recommendations based on the literature are made for several design parameters namely, bubble diameter and velocity of rise, gas holdup, interfacial area, mass-transfer coefficients k a and /cl but not /cg, axial liquid-phase dispersion coefficient, and heat-transfer coefficient to the wall. The effect of vessel diameter on these parameters is insignificant when D > 0.15 m (0.49 ft), except for the dispersion coefficient. Application of these correlations is to (1) chlorination of toluene in the presence of FeCl,3 catalyst, (2) absorption of SO9 in aqueous potassium carbonate with arsenite catalyst, and (3) reaction of butene with sulfuric acid to butanol. 

Continuous-flow Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) A reaction vessel in which the feed is continuously added, and the products continuously removed. The vessel (tank) is continuously stirred to maintain a uniform concentration within the vessel. 

Various experimental methods to evaluate the kinetics of flow processes existed even in the last centuty. They developed gradually with the expansion of the petrochemical industry. In the 1940s, conversion versus residence time measurement in tubular reactors was the basic tool for rate evaluations. In the 1950s, differential reactor experiments became popular. Only in the 1960s did the use of Continuous-flow Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTRs) start to spread for kinetic studies. A large variety of CSTRs was used to study heterogeneous (contact) catalytic reactions. These included spinning basket CSTRs as well as many kinds of fixed bed reactors with external or internal recycle pumps (Jankowski 1978, Berty 1984.)... 

The experimental unit, shown on the previous page, is the simplest assembly that can be used for high-pressure kinetic studies and catalyst testing. The experimental method is measurement of the rate of reaction in a CSTR (Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor) by a steady-state method. 

In previous studies, the main tool for process improvement was the tubular reactor. This small version of an industrial reactor tube had to be operated at less severe conditions than the industrial-size reactor. Even then, isothermal conditions could never be achieved and kinetic interpretation was ambiguous. Obviously, better tools and techniques were needed for every part of the project. In particular, a better experimental reactor had to be developed that could produce more precise results at well defined conditions. By that time many home-built recycle reactors (RRs), spinning basket reactors and other laboratory continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) were in use and the subject of publications. Most of these served the original author and his reaction well but few could generate the mass velocities used in actual production units. 

A continuous flow stirred tank reactor (CFSTR) differs from the batch reactor in that the feed mixture continuously enters and the outlet mixture is continuously withdrawn. There is intense mixing in the reactor to destroy any concentration and temperature differences. Heat transfer must be extremely efficient to keep the temperature of the reaction mixture equal to the temperature of the heat transfer medium. The CFSTR can either be used alone or as part of a series of battery CFSTRs as shown in Figure 4-5. If several vessels are used in series, the net effect is partial backmixing. 

Fig ure 6-22. Temperature versus conversion for a first order irreversible reaction in an adiabatic continuous flow stirred tank reactor. 

There are a variety of ways of accomplishing a particular unit operation. Alternative types of process equipment have different inherently safer characteristics such as inventory, operating conditions, operating techniques, mechanical complexity, and forgiveness (i.e., the process/unit operation is inclined to move itself toward a safe region, rather than unsafe). For example, to complete a reaction step, the designer could select a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR), a small tubular reactor, or a distillation tower to process the reaction. 

Bourne, J.R. and Yu, S., 1994. Investigation of micromixing in stirred tank reactors using parallel reactions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 33, 41-55. 

Homogeneous reactions are those in which the reactants, products, and any catalysts used form one continuous phase (gaseous or liquid). Homogeneous gas phase reactors are almost always operated continuously, whereas liquid phase reactors may be batch or continuous. Tubular (pipeline) reactors arc normally used for homogeneous gas phase reactions (e.g., in the thermal cracking of petroleum of dichloroethane lo vinyl chloride). Both tubular and stirred tank reactors are used for homogeneous liquid phase reactions. 

Biocatalysts in nature tend to be optimized to perform best in aqueous environments, at neutral pH, temperatures below 40 °C, and at low osmotic pressure. These conditions are sometimes in conflict with the need of the chemist or process engineer to optimize a reaction with respect to space-time yield or high product concentration in order to facilitate downstream processing. Furthermore, enzymes and whole cells are often inhibited by products or substrates. This might be overcome by the use of continuously operated stirred tank reactors, fed-batch reactors, or reactors with in situ product removal [14, 15]. The addition of organic solvents to increase the solubility of substrates and/or products is a common practice [16]. 

During the manufacturing process, if the grafting increases during early stages of the reaction, the phase volume will also increase, but the size of the particles will remain constant [146-148]. Furthermore, reactor choice plays a decisive role. If the continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) is used, little grafting takes place and the occlusion is poor and, consequently, the rubber efficiency is poor. However, in processes akin to the discontinuous system(e.g., tower/cascade reactors), the dispersed phase contains a large number of big inclusions. 

In Fig. 28, the abscissa kt is the product of the reaction rate constant and the reactor residence time, which is proportional to the reciprocal of the space velocity. The parameter k co is the product of the CO inhibition parameter and inlet concentration. Since k is approximately 5 at 600°F these three curves represent c = 1, 2, and 4%. The conversion for a first-order kinetics is independent of the inlet concentration, but the conversion for the kinetics of Eq. (48) is highly dependent on inlet concentration. As the space velocity increases, kt decreases in a reciprocal manner and the conversion for a first-order reaction gradually declines. For the kinetics of Eq. (48), the conversion is 100% at low space velocities, and does not vary as the space velocity is increased until a threshold is reached with precipitous conversion decline. The conversion for the same kinetics in a stirred tank reactor is shown in Fig. 29. For the kinetics of Eq. (48), multiple solutions may be encountered when the inlet concentration is sufficiently high. Given two reactors of the same volume, and given the same kinetics and inlet concentrations, the conversions are compared in Fig. 30. The piston flow reactor has an advantage over the stirred tank... 

The kinetics of a mixed platinum and base metal oxide catalyst should have complementary features, and would avoid some of the reactor instability problems here. The only stirred tank reactor for a solid-gas reaction is the whirling basket reactor of Carberry, and is not adaptable for automotive use (84) A very shallow pellet bed and a recycle reactor may approach the stirred tank reactor sufficiently to offer some interest. 

In this short initial communication we wish to describe a general purpose continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) system which incorporates a digital computer for supervisory control purposes and which has been constructed for use with radical and other polymerization processes. The performance of the system has been tested by attempting to control the MWD of the product from free-radically initiated solution polymerizations of methyl methacrylate (MMA) using oscillatory feed-forward control strategies for the reagent feeds. This reaction has been selected for study because of the ease of experimentation which it affords and because the theoretical aspects of the control of MWD in radical polymerizations has attracted much attention in the scientific literature. 

---