Systemic solute distribution

The continuous line in Figure 16 shows results from fitting a single tie line in addition to the binary data. Only slight improvement is obtained in prediction of the two-phase region more important, however, prediction of solute distribution is improved. Incorporation of the single ternary tie line into the method of data reduction produces only a small loss of accuracy in the representation of VLE for the two binary systems. 

If there are ions in the solution, they will try to change their location according to the electrostatic potential in the system. Their distribution can be described according to Boltzmarm. Including these effects and applying some mathematics leads to the final linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation (Eq. (43)). 

Many waste-rock or overburden disposal systems result ia compacted dumps having uncontrolled distribution of fines. In such dumps, solution distribution is poor and there is Htde oxygen for reaction with the sulfides. Methods for managing these dumps to maximize copper recovery have been actively pursued. 

A separation process that is achieved by the distribution of the substances to be separated between two phases, a stationary phase and a mobile phase. Those solutes, distributed preferentially in the mobile phase, will move more rapidly through the system than those distributed preferentially in the stationary phase. Thus, the solutes will elute in order of their increasing distribution coefficients with respect to the stationary phase."... 

The distribution coefficient is an equilibrium constant and, therefore, is subject to the usual thermodynamic treatment of equilibrium systems. By expressing the distribution coefficient in terms of the standard free energy of solute exchange between the phases, the nature of the distribution can be understood and the influence of temperature on the coefficient revealed. However, the distribution of a solute between two phases can also be considered at the molecular level. It is clear that if a solute is distributed more extensively in one phase than the other, then the interactive forces that occur between the solute molecules and the molecules of that phase will be greater than the complementary forces between the solute molecules and those of the other phase. Thus, distribution can be considered to be as a result of differential molecular forces and the magnitude and nature of those intermolecular forces will determine the magnitude of the respective distribution coefficients. Both these explanations of solute distribution will be considered in this chapter, but the classical thermodynamic explanation of distribution will be treated first. 

More work is necessary before solute distribution between immiscible phases can be quantitatively described by classical physical chemistry theory. In the mean time, we must content ourselves with largely empirical equations based on experimentally confirmed relationships in the hope that they will provide an approximate estimate of the optimum phase system that is required for a particular separation. 

So far the plate theory has been used to examine first-order effects in chromatography. However, it can also be used in a number of other interesting ways to investigate second-order effects in both the chromatographic system itself and in ancillary apparatus such as the detector. The plate theory will now be used to examine the temperature effects that result from solute distribution between two phases. This theoretical treatment not only provides information on the thermal effects that occur in a column per se, but also gives further examples of the use of the plate theory to examine dynamic distribution systems and the different ways that it can be employed. 

The theory that results from the investigation of the dynamics of solute distribution between the two phases of a chromatographic system and which allows the different dispersion processes to be qualitatively and quantitatively specified has been designated the Rate Theory. However, historically, the Rate Theory was never developed as such, but evolved over more than a decade from the work of a number of physical chemists and chemical engineers, such as those mentioned in chapter 1. 

Consequently, the solutes will pass through the chromatographic system at speeds that are inversely proportional to their distribution coefficients with respect to the stationary phase. The control of solute retention by the magnitude of the solute distribution coefficient will be discussed in the next chapter. 

The vast majority of modem liquid chromatography systems involve the use of silica gel or a derivative of silica gel, such as a bonded phase, as a stationary phase. Thus, it would appear that most LC separations are carried out by liquid-solid chromatography. Owing to the adsorption of solvent on the surface of both silica and bonded phases, however, the physical chemical characteristics of the separation are more akin to a liquid-liquid distribution system than that of a liquid-solid system. As a consequence, although most modern stationary phases are in fact solids, solute distribution is usually treated theoretically as a liquid-liquid system. 

As will be described in detail below, solute distribution in biphasic systems can be modulated by application of a Galvani potential difference across the interface, thereby leading to the transfer of species from one phase to the other. Therefore, in electrochemical terms, passive transfer simply means the partition across an interface, mediated by a potential-driven process. 

The simplest are statistical theories, where the input information is reduced to the distribution of units in different reaction states. The reaction state of a unit is defined by the number and type of bonds issuing from the unit. In a reacting system, the distribution fraction of units in different reaction states is a function of the reaction time (conversion) (cf. e.g. [7, 8, 29, 30] and can be obtained either experimentally (e.g. by NMR) or calculated by solution of a few simple kinetic differential equations. An example of reaction state distribution of an AB2 unit is... 

In many practical solvent extraction systems, one of the two liquids between which the solute distributes is an aqueous solution that contains one or more electrolytes. The distributing solute itself may be an electrolyte. An electrolyte is a substance that is capable of ionic dissociation, and does dissociate at least partly to ions in solution. These ions are likely to be solvated by the solvent (or, in water, to be hydrated) [5]. In addition to ion-solvent interactions, the ions will also interact with one another repulsively, if of the same charge sign, attractively, if of the opposite sign. However, ion-ion interactions may be negligible if the solution is extremely dilute. The electrolyte is made up of... 

The LLE for another ternary system, ethyl terf-butyl ether (ETBE) -t ethanol -l- [C4CiIm][TfO], at 298.15 K was studied by Arce et al. [35]. To determine the tie-line compositions, they used the NMR spectroscopy. The values of the solute distribution ratio fi = XEtoH V. EtoH / where II refers to an IL-rich phase) and selectivity (S = /SEtoH// EXBE) were calculated from tie-line data. In general, both the solute distribution ratio and the selectivity decreased as the molar fraction of efhanol in the organic-rich phase increased, the maximal values being ca. 3.5 and ca. 22, respectively. The ETBE + ethanol + IL system was compared to the ETBE + ethanol + water system. 

Arce et al. also investigated the effect of anion fluorination in [CjCjIm] ILs on fhe exfracfion of efhanol from ETBE [36]. For this purpose, two anions, methanesulfonate and trifluoromethanesulfonate, were selected. The corresponding phase diagrams were plotted for both ternary ETBE + ethanol + IL systems. The solute distribution ratios for the IL with the nonfluorinated anion were higher, especially at low concentrations. As for the selectivities, better results were obtained for mefhanesulfonate IL at low solute concentrations, while at higher solute concentrations the selectivity was better for the fluorinated analog. 

Solution of the equations is a process in which the coefficients of Eq. (14.28) are iteratively improved. To start, estimates must be made of the flow rates of all components in every stage. One procedure is to assume complete removal of a light key into the extract and of the heavy key into the raffinate, and to keep the solvent in the extract phase throughout the system. The distribution of the keys in the intermediate stages is assumed to vary linearly, and they must be made consistent with the overall balance, Eq. (14.27), for each component. With these estimated flowrates, the values of xik and yik are evaluated and may be used to find the activity coefficients and distribution ratios, Kik. This procedure is used in Example 14.9. 

To obtain the final solute distribution in the solid, the relatively slow changes in the quasi-steady-state system must be considered. If the concentration spike moves forward by dx, the amount of solute that must be rejected into the bulk liquid is (c , - cSL)dx, where the slowly changing concentration in the bulk liquid is... 

Nemst found that if a substance is present in two immiscible solvents in a system at equilibrium then the solute distributes itself between the two immiscible solvents in such a way that at constant temperature, the ratio of its concentrations in the two solvents is constant, whatever the total amount of the solute may be. 

---