System Identification Tools

Identification of the dynamic behaviour of adaptronic structures may be performed in the framework of modal testing (experimental modal analysis) or in a more control-oriented fashion known as system identification. In the former case, commercially available software packages can be used. They offer a variety of data acquisition and processing capabilities (modal analysis, frequency response functions, etc.) combined with comfortable graphical user interfaces. 

For all of the tools mentioned, proper application requires the knowledge of the physical and modelling background together with that on the steps mentioned in this chapter, and engineering insight into the adaptronic system to be developed. 

Slotine, J.-J.E. Li, W. Applied nonlinear control. Prentice-HaU, Englewood 

Lagoudas, D.C. Thermomechanical response of shape memory composites. J. Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 5 (1994), pp. 333 346 

Preumont, A. Dufour, J.-P. Malkian, C. Active damping by a local force feedback with piezoelectric actuators. AIAA J. Guidance, Control, and D5Tiamics, 15 (1992), pp. 390-395 

---

In modelling a system, procedures are needed to handle this type of uncertainty. Clearly, the experience and knowledge of the involved experts is the key to identifying the proper mechanisms, but the identification process is significantly enhanced by using system identification tools, such as the interaction matrices referred to in Section 2 and further described in Harrison and Hudson (2000). 

For these reasons, researchers have recently focused on developing faster robotic systems and more sensitive analytical metabolite identification tools [5-9]. However, such techniques are usually resource demanding, consuming a considerable amount of compound, and cannot be used before compound synthesis. Also, because of the increasing number of potential candidates, experimental metabolite identification remains a huge challenge. 

There are several computer software packages that are quite helpful in applying some of the computationally intensive methods. The PC-MATLAB System Identification Toolbox (The Math Works, Inc., Sherborn, Mass.) is an easy-to-use, powerful software package that provides an array of alternative tools,... 

The scope embraces continuous processes with reaction and separation sections. Because our approach in this book is based upon a plantwide perspective, we cover what is relevant to this particular area. We omit much basic process control material that constitutes the framework and provides the tools for dynamic analysis, stability, system identification, and controller tuning. But we refer the interested reader... 

It is important to remember that changes in column packings and chromatographic systems may alter the retention of closely eluting compounds, and these elution schemes should only be used in conjunction with other identification tools such as tandem MS Ifagmen-tation patterns and high-mass accuracy measurements. 

Since the complexity of the physiologic system identification problem rivals its importance, we begin by demarcating those areas where effective methods and tools currently exist. The selection among candidate models is made on the basis of the following key functional characteristics (1) static or dynamic (2) Hnear or nonhnear (3) stationary or nonstationary (4) deterministic or stochastic (5) single or multiple inputs and/or outputs (6) lumped or distributed. These classification criteria do not constitute an exhaustive list but cover most cases of current interest. Furthermore, it is critical to remember that contaminating noise (be it systemic or measurement-related) is always present in an actual study, and... 

Cross-correlation and spectral analysis have proven invaluable tools for quantifying the frequency dependent characteristics of the human subject. The cross-spectral density function, or cross-spectrum Sxyif), can be obtained from the random target x t) and random response y t) by taking the Fourier transform of the cross-correlation function Vxyir), that is, Sxyif) = Ffr yfr), or in the frequency domain via Sxy if) = X(/) y(/), or by a nonparametric system identification approach (e.g., spa.m in Matlab ). The cross-spectrum provides estimates of the relative amphtude (i.e., gain) and phase-lag at each frequency. Gain, phase, and remnant frequency response curves provide objective measures of pursuit... 

Even though Bayesian inference is useful for uncertainty quantification that fulfills the need in civil engineering, the literature shows that developments and applications of this powerful tool in civil engineering are still at an early stage. Therefore, there is plenty of room to be explored for Bayesian applications in civil engineering. This book introduces some recently developed Bayesian methods and applications to a number of areas in civil engineering. The main concern here is on the identification of dynamical systems, but some of the methods are also applicable to static problems. Two types of problems in system identification are... 

The preliminary hazard analysis (PHA) is an initial look at the entire system. A PHL, if available, is expanded by adding new hazards that may be identified as more project information is developed, as well as more information about each hazard. If a PHL has not been prepared, the PHA serves as the primary hazard identification tool as well as the initial hazard analysis. The methods used for conducting a PHA are basically the same as for a PHL, even though occasionally more advanced techniques may be appropriate. 

The information provided above on this proposed system reveals many serious or potentially serious hazard risk levels. When asking the basic questions associated with the identification of system risk, the analyst can begin to categorize the severity of a potential mishap and evaluate the probability of a possible occurrence (refer Tables 2.1 and 2.2). The following is an itemized listing of a few of the initial safety concerns which should be resolved prior to proceeding into the design phase of this project s life cycle. The identification of these potential hazard risks is the result of proper utilization of the basic system safety tools discussed thus far. 

Here again, after making very similar sweeping simplifications to those used for the indentation model, it is possible to produce a powerful tool in the analysis of hardness anisotropy and slip-system identification. The following assumptions and simplifications can be compared to those in Section 3.6.1.1. 

Mass spectrometty is generally used in the flavor area to either determine the identity of an unknown or to act as a mass-selective GC detector. As mentioned, MS as an identification tool is unequaled by other instruments. The systems have largely become turn-key systems that require little or no operator expertise. If the operator can do GC, he/she can do MS. Comprehensive MS libraries and efficient searching algorithms make identification simple however, here lies a danger. A MS will provide a best match (suggest identity) for any unknown irrespective of the validity of the match. The neophyte often accepts the proposed identifications without question and obtains incorrect identifications. It is essential that all MS identifications be supported by other data, for example, GC retention data, IR, or nmr. 

---