Hardness anisotropy

An applied field in the xy-plane can tune the tunnel splittings Amm. via the Sx and Sy spin operators of the Zeeman terms that do not commute with the spin Hamiltonian. This effect can be demonstrated by using the Landau-Zener method (Section 3.1). Fig. 8 presents a detailed study of the tunnel splitting A 10 at the tunnel transition between m - +10, as a function of transverse fields applied at different angles (p, defined as the azimuth angle between the anisotropy hard axis and the transverse field (Fig. 4). 

Another important application of perturbation theory is to molecules with anisotropic interactions. Examples are dipolar hard spheres, in which the anisotropy is due to the polarity of tlie molecule, and liquid crystals in which the anisotropy is due also to the shape of the molecules. The use of an anisotropic reference system is more natural in accounting for molecular shape, but presents difficulties. Hence, we will consider only... 

Substitution for Fe has a drastic effect on intrinsic magnetic properties. Partial substitution by or decreases J) without affecting seriously, resulting in larger and values. Substitution by Ti and Co causes a considerable decrease in K , the uniaxial anisotropy (if j > 0) may even change into planar anisotropy (if < 0). Intermediate magnetic stmctures are also possible. For example, preferred directions on a conical surface around the i -axis are observed for substitution (72). For a few substitutions the value is increased whereas the J) value is hardly affected, eg, substitution of Fe byRu (73) or by Fe compensated by at Ba-sites (65). 

Anisotropy in metals and composite materials is common as a result of manufacturing history. Anisotropic materials often display significantly different results when tested along different planes. This appHes to indentation hardness tests as well as any other test. 

The present review shows how the microhardness technique can be used to elucidate the dependence of a variety of local deformational processes upon polymer texture and morphology. Microhardness is a rather elusive quantity, that is really a combination of other mechanical properties. It is most suitably defined in terms of the pyramid indentation test. Hardness is primarily taken as a measure of the irreversible deformation mechanisms which characterize a polymeric material, though it also involves elastic and time dependent effects which depend on microstructural details. In isotropic lamellar polymers a hardness depression from ideal values, due to the finite crystal thickness, occurs. The interlamellar non-crystalline layer introduces an additional weak component which contributes further to a lowering of the hardness value. Annealing effects and chemical etching are shown to produce, on the contrary, a significant hardening of the material. The prevalent mechanisms for plastic deformation are proposed. Anisotropy behaviour for several oriented materials is critically discussed. 

For density values g > 0.92 g/cm3 the deformation modes of the crystals predominate. The hard elements are the lamellae. The mechanical properties are primarily determined by the large anisotropy of molecular forces. The mosaic structure of blocks introduces a specific weakness element which permits chain slip to proceed faster at the block boundaries than inside the blocks. The weakest element of the solid is the surface layer between adjacent lamellae, containing chain folds, free chain ends, tie molecules, etc. 

It has been shown that the anisotropy depends on the orientation of the diagonals of indentation relative to the axial direction 14). At least two well defined hardness values for draw ratios A. > 8 emerge. One value (maximum) can be derived from the indentation diagonal parallel to the fibre axis. The second one (minimum) is deduced from the diagonal perpendicular to it. The former value is, in fact, not a physical measure of hardness but responds to an instant elastic recovery of the fibrous network in the draw direction. The latter value defines the plastic component of the oriented material. 

As has been noticed by Gelbart and Gelbart [7], the predominant orientational interaction in nematics results from the isotropic dispersion attraction modulated by the anisotropic molecular hard-core. The anisotropy of this effective potential comes from that of the asymmetric molecular shape. The coupling between the isotropic attraction and the anisotropic hard-core repulsion is represented by the effective potential... 

The structures of electroplated hard alloys have been less extensively studied than those of similar electrolessly deposited materials. Sallo and co-workers [118-120] have investigated the relationship between the structure and the magnetic properties of CoP and CoNiP electrodeposits. The structures and domain patterns were different for deposits with different ranges of coercivity. The lower-f/c materials formed lamellar structures with the easy axis of magnetization in the plane of the film. The high-Hc deposits, on the other hand, had a rod-like structure, and shape anisotropy may have contributed to the high coercivity. The platelets and rods are presumed to be isolated by a thin layer of a nonmagnetic material. 

W. L. Elban and R. W. Armstrong, Plastic Anisotropy and Cracking at Hardness Impressions in Single Crystal Ammonium Perchlorate, Acta Mater., 46, 6041 (1998). 

Such modification of the anisotropy would be hard to achieve, though, with Gd(III) ions, as their anisotropy would be minimal even with engineered ligand changes so this approach would be better suited to 3d chemistry, where the metal ion orbitals can interact more strongly with those of the ligands. Figure 9.9 tells us that isotropic 3d-metals are better for lower temperature work than anisotropic ones. 

---