Suspension polymerization reaction kinetics

An elegant way of removing the heat of reaction occurs in suspension or emulsion polymerizations. Suspension polymerization is kinetically simpler. It really proceeds in bulk, as every monomer-polymer drop of the suspension is an individual reactor . These particles are small (100-150 pm), they have a large surface area, and the heat is effectively transferred by water to the cooling jacket. The polymer is contaminated by the tenside used for suspension stabilization. Therefore it must be washed, and even so it is sometimes less suitable for high-performance electrotechnical applications than a polymer prepared in bulk. For the suspension process, the initiator must be soluble in the monomer. 

Divinylbenzene copolymers with styrene are produced extensively as supports for the active sites of ion-exchange resins and in biochemical synthesis. About 1—10 wt % divinylbenzene is used, depending on the required rigidity of the cross-linked gel, and the polymerization is carried out as a suspension of the monomer-phase droplets in water, usually as a batch process. Several studies have been reported on the reaction kinetics (200,201). 

The concentration of monomers in the aqueous phase is usually very low. This means that there is a greater chance that the initiator-derived radicals (I ) will undergo side reactions. Processes such as radical-radical reaction involving the initiator-derived and oligomeric species, primary radical termination, and transfer to initiator can be much more significant than in bulk, solution, or suspension polymerization and initiator efficiencies in emulsion polymerization are often very low. Initiation kinetics in emulsion polymerization are defined in terms of the entry coefficient (p) - a pseudo-first order rate coefficient for particle entry. 

The Instantaneous values for the initiator efficiencies and the rate constants associated with the suspension polymerization of styrene using benzoyl peroxide have been determined from explicit equations based on the instantaneous polymer properties. The explicit equations for the rate parameters have been derived based on accepted reaction schemes and the standard kinetic assumptions (SSH and LCA). The instantaneous polymer properties have been obtained from the cummulative experimental values by proposing empirical models for the instantaneous properties and then fitting them to the cummulative experimental values. This has circumvented some of the problems associated with differenciating experimental data. The results obtained show that ... 

Dispersion polymerization involves an initially homogeneous system of monomer, organic solvent, initiator, and particle stabilizer (usually uncharged polymers such as poly(A-vinyl-pyrrolidinone) and hydroxypropyl cellulose). The system becomes heterogeneous on polymerization because the polymer is insoluble in the solvent. Polymer particles are stabilized by adsorption of the particle stabilizer [Yasuda et al., 2001], Polymerization proceeds in the polymer particles as they absorb monomer from the continuous phase. Dispersion polymerization usually yields polymer particles with sizes in between those obtained by emulsion and suspension polymerizations—about 1-10 pm in diameter. For the larger particle sizes, the reaction characteristics are the same as in suspension polymerization. For the smallest particle sizes, suspension polymerization may exhibit the compartmentalized kinetics of emulsion polymerization. 

Although the above derivations involve certain simplifications, they nevertheless represent correctly the kinetics of many addition polymerization reactions. However, the behavior is different when the polymerization is conducted under heterogeneous conditions, e.g., in suspension or in emulsion (see literature cited in Sect. 2.2.4). 

The term suspension polymerization refers to the polymerization of macroscopic droplets in an aqueous medium. The kinetics is essentially that of a bulk polymerization with the expected adjustments associated with carrying out a number of bulk polymerizations in small particles more or less simultaneously and in reasonably good contact with a heat exchanger (i.e., the reaction medium) to control the exothermic nature of the process. Usually, suspension polymerizations are characterized by the use of monomer-soluble initiators and the use of suspending agents. 

Several methodologies for preparation of monodisperse polymer particles are known [1]. Among them, dispersion polymerization in polar media has often been used because of the versatility and simplicity of the process. So far, the dispersion polymerizations and copolymerizations of hydrophobic classical monomers such as styrene (St), methyl methacrylate (MMA), etc., have been extensively investigated, in which the kinetic, molecular weight and colloidal parameters could be controlled by reaction conditions [6]. The preparation of monodisperse polymer particles in the range 1-20 pm is particularly challenging because it is just between the limits of particle size of conventional emulsion polymerization (100-700 nm) and suspension polymerization (20-1000 pm). 

Batch suspension reactors are, theoretically, the kinetic equivalent of water-cooled mass reactors. The major new problems are stabilization of the viscous polymer drops, prediction of particle size distribution, etc. Particle size distribution was found to be determined early in the polymerization by Hopff et al. (28, 29,40). Church and Shinnar (12) applied turbulence theory to explain the stabilization of suspension polymers by the combined action of protective colloids and turbulent flow forces. Suspension polymerization in a CSTR without coalescence is a prime example of the segregated CSTR treated by Tadmor and Biesenberger (51) and is discussed below. In a series of papers, Goldsmith and Amundson (23) and Luss and Amundson (39) studied the unique control and stability problems which arise from the existence of the two-phase reaction system. 

As mentioned earlier, polymerization techniques can also be used in the presence of nanotubes for preparation of polymer/CNT nanocomposite materials. In these, in-situ radical polymerization techniques of polymerization in the presence of CNT filler under or without applied ultrasound. Both new factors (presence of CNT and ultrasound) can affect reaction kinetics, stability of suspension or the size of prepared particles. For example, ultrasound waves can open C=C bond of monomer, which starts polymerization initiation. Thus vinyl monomers (styrene, methyl methacrylate or vinyl acetate) can be polymerized without addition of initiator, only by application of ultrasound. This is called sonochemical polymerization method (15,33,34). 

Polystyrene can be easily prepared by emulsion or suspension techniques. Harkins (1 ), Smith and Ewart(2) and Garden ( ) have described the mechanisms of emulsTon polymerization in batch reactors, and the results have been extended to a series of continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTR)( o Much information on continuous emulsion reactors Ts documented in the patent literature, with such innovations as use of a seed latex (5), use of pulsatile flow to reduce plugging of the tube ( ), and turbulent flow to reduce plugging (7 ). Feldon (8) discusses the tubular polymerization of SBR rubber wTth laminar flow (at Reynolds numbers of 660). There have been recent studies on continuous stirred tank reactors utilizing Smith-Ewart kinetics in a single CSTR ( ) as well as predictions of particle size distribution (10). Continuous tubular reactors have been examined for non-polymeric reactions (1 1 ) and polymeric reactions (12.1 31 The objective of this study was to develop a model for the continuous emulsion polymerization of styrene in a tubular reactor, and to verify the model with experimental data. 

However, the probability for the reaction progression greatly depends on the monomer conversion. Because the viscosity of the dispersed phase, in the first stage, is fairly low and the quantity of styrene is sufficiently high, the decomposition process (Figure 9.4) occurs only up to the benzoyloxy radical, which can directly start the kinetic chain. The purely thermal start of chains with reactive dimers of styrene, as a result of Diels-Alder reaction, can be ignored at fairly low temperatures of suspension polymerization, in contrast to the conditions for the bulk styrene process [4-7]. 

The kinetic schemes described in this chapter apply to free-radical polymerizations in bulk monomer, solution, or in suspension. Suspension polymerizations ([Section 10.4.2.(iii)]) involve the reactions of monomers which are dispersed in droplets in water. These monomer droplets contain the initiator, and polymerization is a water-cooled bulk reaction in effect. Emulsion systems also contain water, monomer and initiator, but the kinetics of emulsion polymerizations are different from those of the processes listed above. Chapter 8 describes emulsion polymerizations. 

The free-radical kinetics described in Chapter 6 hold for homogeneous systems. They will prevail in well-stirred bulk or solution polymerizations or in suspension polymerizations if the polymer is soluble in its monomer. Polystyrene suspension polymerization is an important commercial example of this reaction type. Suspension polymerizations of vinyl ehloride and of acrylonitrile are described by somewhat different kinetic schemes because the polymers precipitate in these cases. Emulsion polymerizations aie controlled by still different reaetion parameters because the growing macroradicals are isolated in small volume elements and because the free radieals which initiate the polymerization process are generated in the aqueous phase. The emulsion process is now used to make large tonnages of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), latex paints and adhesives, PVC paste polymers, and other produets. 

The inverse suspension was obtained by mixing the organic solution of a nonionic surfactant with the aqueous solution of partially neutralized acrylic acid salt. The temperature was then raised, and the polymerization reaction was carried out for several hours. The samples were then dried and ready for swelling kinetics experiments. They were transferred into an excess of solvent, and the time at which they looked homogeneous was f = 0 for the kinetics experiments. 

In a complex apparatus, Gimesch and Schneider [30, 119] studied the suspension polymerization of vinyl acetate. Their procedure involved equipment which automatically added tempered water to the reacting system as heat was evolved as a result of the polymerization process. Thus they maintained isothermal reaction conditions. The rate of reaction could be followed by recording the water uptake of the equipment with time. The heat of polymerization was also determined (found to be 23 kcal/mole which was considered a satisfactory check of the literature value which is scattered around 21.4 kcal/mole). From this work, a somewhat different mechanism of the suspension polymerization process emerges than the widely accepted concept of the water-cooled bulk polymerization of small particles. It was noted that with an increase in the initiator concentration, there was the expected increase in polymerization rate. With increasing stirring rate, the rate of polymerization decreased. Along with the suspension polymerization, there was always a certain amoimt of imdesirable emulsion polymerization. It was postulated that in the process, free radicals, formed in a monomer drop may be extracted into the aqueous phase where they may act on dissolved vinyl acetate by kinetic processes unique to this system and different from the conventional mechanism of suspension polymerization. 

When water-soluble initiators are used, most of the authors concluded that acrylamide polymerization proceeds within the monomer droplets, irrespective of the nature of the organic phase (aromatic or aliphatic) [28,30-34], Both monomer and initiator reside in the dispersed droplets and each particle acts as a small batch reactor. The process is essentially a suspension polymerization and therefore the kinetics resemble those for solution polymerization. Note that a prefix micro has been added in some cases to this type of polymerization (microsuspension) to emphasize the smallness of the reactor (d 1 pm) and the possibility of interfacial reactions [33]. A square root dependence of the polymerization rate, / p, on initiator concentration, [I] was often observed, in good accord with solution polymerization [28,32-34]. Higher orders were also found which were attributed to chain transfer to the emulsifier [30]. The reaction order with respect to monomer was found to vary from 1 [2832] to 1.7 [3031]> Orders higher than 1 are common for acrylamide polymerization in homogeneous aqueous solution and are explained by the occurrence of a cage effect [35]. 

To form a dispersion, the monomer must be quite insoluble in the suspension system. To decrease the solubility and to sometimes also increase the particle size of the resultant polymer bead, partially polymerized monomers or prepolymers may be used. Optimum results are obtained with initiators that are soluble in the monomer. Often, no differences in rates are observed between polymerization in bulk and suspension. Kinetic studies of styrene suspension polymerization have shown that all the reaction steps, initiation, propagation, and termination, occur inside the particles. ... 

Suspension polymerization occurs in water with the liquid monomer dispersed by agitaliorL The polymer is produced as a dispersed solid phase fiom polymerization of initiator-containing, 10 to 500 pm droplets under kinetics that match those of the bulk reaction of the monomer (7). The suspension is stabilized by insoluble organic or inorganic solids, electrolytes to increase monomer-water interfacial tension, and water soluble polymers that increase aqueous viscosity. Suspension polymerization is commonly used to synthesize two polymers covered in this book, polystyrene and polyvinyl chloride. 

---