Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sublingual immunotherapy

Some patients experience discomfort and frequent swelling at the site of injection. As a consequence, sublingual immunotherapy has been explored in Europe. An extract of allergens is placed under the tongue for a couple of minutes and is then swallowed. The dose for sublingual immunotherapy is 3-300 times greater than that for subcutaneous immunotherapy. This form of therapy is more effective for [Pg.141]


Pajno GB, Caminiti L, Vita D, Barberio G, Salzano G, Lombardo F, Canonica GW, Passalacqua G Sublingual immunotherapy in mite-sensitized children with atopic dermatitis a randomized, double-blind, placebo-con-trolled study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007 120 164-170. [Pg.109]

Bohle B, Kinaciyan T, Gerstmayr M, Radakovics A, Jahn-Schmid B, Ebner C Sublingual immunotherapy induces IL-lO-producing T regulatory ceUs, allergen-specific T-ceU tolerance, and immune deviation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007 120 707-713. ... [Pg.209]

Roder E, Berger MY, Hop WC, Bernsen RM, de Groot H, Gerth van Wijk R. Sublingual immunotherapy with grass pollen is not effective in symptomatic youngsters in primary care. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007 119(4) 892-8. [Epub 2007 Feb 23]. [Pg.657]

Wilson DR, Lima MT, Durham SR. Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2005 60(1) 4-12. Review. [Pg.657]

Specific immunotherapy is a very powerful tool which is currently underutilized in the treatment of allergies. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has many advantages over subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), and has been well proven to work for many pollens and dust mites. Multiple studies have shown SLIT improves symptoms and reduces the reliance on medications. Sublingual treatment has been studied in Europe and is endorsed by the World Health Organization Committee on Immunotherapy as a viable alternative to SCIT. [Pg.1]

Conclusion SLIT offers another option for patients who are not currently candidates for subcutaneous immunotherapy. Because of improved safety, convenience and compliance, sublingual immunotherapy should be used as a first-line treatment option. [Pg.1]

European baseline SCIT dosage is lower than the US (this may account for some of the variability and higher ratios). SLIT/SCIT ratio = Sublingual immunotherapy monthly maintenance dose/subcutaneous monthly maintenance dose IR = index of reactivity N/A = not available ssx = symptom scores NC = no change meds = medication use ID = intradermal NS = not significant. [Pg.4]

Mungan D, Misirligil Z, Gurbuz L, et al Comparison of the efficacy of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy in mite-sensitive patients with rhinitis and asthma - A placebo controlled study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999 82 485 190. [Pg.8]

Tari MG, Mancino M, Monti G Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with rhinitis and asthma due to house dust mite - A double blind study. Allergol Immunopathol 1990 18/5 277-284. [Pg.8]

Bahceciler NN, Isik U, Bartan IB, Basaran MM Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in children with asthma and rhinitis A double blind, placebo-controlled study. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001 32 49-55. [Pg.8]

Troise C, Voltolini S, Canessa A, Pecora S, Negrini AC Sublingual immunotherapy in Parietaria pollen-induced rhinitis A double-blind study. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol 1995 5/1 25—30. [Pg.8]

Passalacqua G, Albano M, Riccio A, Fregonese L, Puccinelli P, Parmiani S, Canonica GW Clinical and immunologic effects of a rush sublingual immunotherapy to Parietaria species A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999 104 964-968. [Pg.8]

Clavel R, Andre C, Bousquet J Reduction of corticosteroid therapy by sublingual immunotherapy. Double blind study against placebo of standardised 5 grass pollen extract in rhinitis. Allergy 1995 50/26 279. [Pg.9]

Fanta C, Bohle B, Hirt W, Siemann U, Horak F, Kraft D, Ebner H, Ebner C Systemic immunological changes induced by administration of grass pollen allergens via the oral mucosa during sublingual immunotherapy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1999 120 218-224. [Pg.9]

Hordijk GJ, Antvelink JB, Luwema RA Sublingual immunotherapy with a standardised grass pollen extract a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Allergol Immunopathol 1998 26/5 ... [Pg.9]

Vourdas D, Syrigou E, Potamianou P, Carat F, Batard T, Andre C, Papageorgiou PS Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized olive pollen extract in pediatric patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and mild asthma due to olive pollen sensitization. Allergy 1998 53 662-672. [Pg.9]

Mastrandrea F, Serio G, Minelli M, Minardi A, Scarcia G, Coradduzza G, Parmiani S Specific sublingual immunotherapy in atopic dermatitis Results of a 6-year follow-up of 35 consecutive patients. Allergol Immunopathol 2000 28/2 54-62. [Pg.9]

Tari MG, Mancino M, Madonna F, Buzzoni L, Parmiani S Immunologic evaluation of 24 month course of sublingual immunotherapy. Allergol Immunopathol 1994 22/5 209-216. [Pg.10]

Passalacqua G, Canonica GW Allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy for respiratory allergy. BioDrugs 2001 15 509-519. [Pg.10]

Lombardi C Safety of sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid in adults Multicenter post-marketing surveillance study. Allergy 2001 56 989-992. [Pg.10]

Andre C Safety of sublingual immunotherapy in children and adults. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000 121 229-234... [Pg.10]

Di Rienzo V Post-marketing surveillance study on the safety of sublingual immunotherapy in children. Allergy 1999 54 1110-1113. [Pg.10]

Marcucci F, Sensi L, Frati F, Senna GE, Canonica GW, Parmiani S, Passalacqua G Sublingual tryptase and ECP in children treated with grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) Safety and immunologic implications. Allergy 2001 56 1091-1095. [Pg.10]

Valle C, Bazzi S, Berra D, Sillano Y Puccinelli P, Parmiani S Effects of sublingual immunotherapy in patients sensitised to Ambrosia. An open controlled study. Allergol Immunopathol 2000 28 311-317. [Pg.10]

The advent of oral/sublingual immunotherapy has redirected interest towards resorption of allergens from the oral mucosa. The resorption of small nonprotein molecules such as ethanol and nitro preparations from the oral mucosa is well known and the latter is arguably one of the most frequently used pharmacological interventions in clinical medicine. However, Passalacqua (fig. 6) was the first to demonstrate resorption of allergens from the oral and nasal mucosa. Parietaria antigen marked with radioactive iodine... [Pg.29]

Purrello-D Ambrosio F, Gangemi S, Isola S, La Motta N, Puccinelli P, Parmiani S, Savi E, Ricciardi L Sublingual immunotherapy A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with Parietaria judaica extract standardized in mass units in patients with rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, or both. Allergy 1999 29 968-973. [Pg.43]

Frew AJ, Smith HE Sublingual immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001 107 441-444. [Pg.43]

Therapeutic Procedures of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Clinical Practice... [Pg.44]


See other pages where Sublingual immunotherapy is mentioned: [Pg.24]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.44]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.141 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.122 ]




SEARCH



Atopic dermatitis sublingual immunotherapy

Dust mite allergy sublingual immunotherapy

Grass pollen allergy sublingual immunotherapy

Immunotherapy

Sublingual

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT

Sublingual immunotherapy allergies

Sublingual immunotherapy comparison

Sublingual immunotherapy controlled trials

Sublingual immunotherapy dosing

Sublingual immunotherapy efficacy

Sublingual immunotherapy long-term effects

Sublingual immunotherapy plasma

Sublingual immunotherapy pollen allergy

Sublingual immunotherapy safety

© 2024 chempedia.info