Styrene, copolymers with Subject

Trying to completely avoid the technically unpleasant process of chloromethylation, Negre et al. [48, 49] prepared a linear styrene copolymer with p-vinylbenzyl chloride and then subjected the product to self-crosslinking. Alternatively to the earlier-mentioned crosslinking of linear polystyrene with MCDE, this procedure results in local inhomogeneity of crosslinks distribution, because of the uneven distribution of the two comonomers along the initial chain (the monomer reactivity ratios of vinylbenzyl chloride and styrene are 1.41 and 0.71, respectively). Nevertheless, vinylbenzyl chloride became a popular comonomer for styrene and DVB in the preparation of beaded hypercrosslinked products [50-52]. 

Corrosion inhibiting compositions for metals subjected to highly acidic environments may be produced by reacting in a condensation reaction a styrene/ maleic anhydride copolymer with a polyamine to produce a polyimidoamine inhibitor [1568]. These inhibitors exhibit film-forming and film-persistency characteristics. Some relevant polyamines are listed in Table 6-2. 

The lithiated polyethylene copolymer was then suspended in hexane or THF solvent. The graft-from reactions were carried out in slurry solution by reacting the lithiated polyethylene copolymer with anionic polymerizable monomers, such as styrene and p-methylstyrene. After certain reaction time, 10 ml of isopropanol was added to terminate the graft-from reaction. The precipitated polymer was filtered and then subjected to fractionation. Good solvents for backbone and side chain polymers were used during the fractionization, using a Soxhlet apparatus under N2 for 24 hours. The soluble fractions were isolated by vacuum-removal of solvent. Usually, the total soluble fractions were less than 5 % of the product. The major insoluble fraction was PE graft copolymer, which was completely soluble in xylene or trichlorobenzene at elevated temperatures. 

Ruckenstein and Zhang reported that the anionic copolymerization of 4-(vinylphenyl)-l-butene with styrene in toluene/THF at —40 °C gives well-defined polymers,133 since under these experimental conditions the vinylic double bond is selectively polymerized. The copolymers were subjected to hydrosilylation for the introduction of Si—Cl groups at the olefinic double bonds. These groups were used as grafting sites for the linking of PSLi, PILi, and PMMALi living chains in order to synthesize PS- -... 

By sequential copolymerization of styrene and propylene using a modified Ziegler-Natta catalyst, MgCl2/TiCl4/NdClc(OR) //Al(iBu)3, which was developed in our laboratory, a styrene-propylene block copolymer is obtained. After fractionation by successive solvent extraction with suitable solvents, the copolymer was subjected to extensive molecular and morphological characterization using 13C-NMR, DSC, DMTA, and TEM. The results indicate that the copolymer is a crystalline diblock copolymer of iPS and iPP (iPS-fo-iPP). The diblock copolymer contains 40% iPS as determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis. 

The solubility of the polyimide dictates, to a large extent, the synthetic route employed for the copolymerization. The ODPA/FDA and 3FDA/PMDA polyimides are soluble in the fully imidized form and can be prepared via the poly(amic-ac-id) precursor and subsequently imidized either chemically or thermally. The PMDA/ODA and FDA/PMDA polyimides, on the other hand, are not soluble in the imidized form. Consequently, the poly(amic alkyl ester) precursors to these polymers were used followed by thermal imidization [44]. For comparison purposes, 3FDA/PMDA-based copolymers were prepared via both routes. The synthesis of the poly(amic acid) involved the addition of solid PMDA to a solution of the styrene oligomer and diamine to yield the corresponding poly(amic acids) (Scheme 8). The polymerizations were performed in NMP at room temperature for 24 h at a solids content of -10% (w/v). Chemical imidization of the po-ly(amic-acid) solutions was carried out in situ by reaction with excess acetic anhydride and pyridine at 100 °C for 6-8 h. The copolymers were subjected to repeated toluene rinses in order to remove any unreacted styrene homopolymer. 

Figure 7.43 Effect of the pretreatment of the network obtained by crosslinking styrene-0.57% DVB copolymer with monochlorodimethyl ether to 100% on the position and form of thermomechanical curves (1) control sample (2) the sample heated up to 136°C under a loading of 400 g and relaxed at 164°C for 2h without pressure (3) the sample heated up to 136°C and then cooled under a loading of 400g (12% residual deformations), then subjected to swelling and drying (4) the sample heated up to 136°C and then cooled under a loading of 400 g (10% residual deformations). (Reprinted from [202] with permission of Wiley Sons, Inc.)...

The NMR method has been extremely successful when applied to sequencing addition copolymers with carbon atom backbone, such as ethylene, propylene, butadiene, acrylonitrile, vinyl acetate, methyl methacrylate, styrene, methylstyrene, vinyl chloride, vinyl fluoride (in this case, F-NMR can be used). " Condensation copolymers such as polyurethanes, polyesters, and polyamides have been analyzed by and NMR. cellent reviews have appeared on this topic, the literature on the subject is always growing, and the instrumental progress is fast. ... 

Electron-withdrawing substituents in anionic polymerizations enhance electron density at the double bonds or stabilize the carbanions by resonance. Anionic copolymerizations in many respects behave similarly to the cationic ones. For some comonomer pairs steric effects give rise to a tendency to altemate. The reactivities of the monomers in copolymerizations and the compositions of the resultant copolymers are subject to solvent polarity and to the effects of the counterions. The two, just as in cationic polymerizations, cannot be considered independently from each other. This, again, is due to the tightness of the ion pairs and to the amount of solvation. Furthermore, only monomers that possess similar polarity can be copolymerized by an anionic mechanism. Thus, for instance, styrene derivatives copolymerize with each other. Styrene, however, is unable to add to a methyl methacrylate anion, though it copolymerizes with butadiene and isoprene. In copolymerizations initiated by w-butyllithium in toluene and in tetrahydrofuran at-78 °C, the following order of reactivity with methyl methacrylate anions was observed. In toluene the order is diphenylmethyl methacrylate > benzyl methacrylate > methyl methacrylate > ethyl methacrylate > a-methylbenzyl methacrylate > isopropyl methacrylate > t-butyl methacrylate > trityl methacrylate > a,a -dimethyl-benzyl methacrylate. In tetrahydrofuran the order changes to trityl methacrylate > benzyl methacrylate > methyl methacrylate > diphenylmethyl methacrylate > ethyl methacrylate > a-methylbenzyl methacrylate > isopropyl methacrylate > a,a -dimethylbenzyl methacrylate > t-butyl methacrylate. 

In a study of the flame retardance of styrene-methyl methacrylate copolymer with covalently bound pyrocatechol-vinyl phosphate, diethyl p-vinyl benzyl phosphonate, or di(2-phenyl ethyl phosphonate) groups. Ebdon and co-workers [23] obtained data on their decomposition behaviour. This was achieved by reducing the rate of liberation of flammable methyl methacrylate monomer during combustion. Possible mechanisms for these processes are suggested. Other methacrylate copolymers which have been the subject of thermal degradation studies include PMMA-N-methylmaleimide-styrene [24] and PMMA-ethylene vinyl acetate [25-27]. 

The importance of restructuring on adhesion properties of polymers is the subject of a final illustration. This involves the peel strength of bonds made between a polymeric adhesive tape ( 3M manufacture) and supported films of styrene/butyl acrylate (S/BA) copolymers with mole ratio compositions of 98/2 and 93/7. Control specimens were made by casting the... 

There is a large amount of literature and many patents in this area, as well as many good reviews and books [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. The recent review by Coates [10] describing stereoselective polymerization overlaps considerably with this chapter, and is recommended for consultation. In this chapter, metallocene-catalyzed olefin polymerization is discussed, focusing on the synthesis of stereoregulated polymers. The aim of this review is not to be a complete survey the outline and some recent topics in polymerization of propylene, higher a-olefins, styrene, acrylate esters such as methyl methacrylate (MMA), 1,3-butadienes, and cycloolefins will be described. Polyethylene is one of the most important commercially manufactured polymers. The homopolymer, as well as the copolymer with ethylene and other olefins, is an important subject in the polyolefin industry. However, it will be only briefly mentioned because the stereochemistry is less involved. 

The toughness of interfaces between immiscible amorphous polymers without any coupling agent has been the subject of a number of recent studies [15-18]. The width of a polymer/polymer interface is known to be controlled by the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter x between the two polymers. The value of x between a random copolymer and a homopolymer can be adjusted by changing the copolymer composition, so the main experimental protocol has been to measure the interface toughness between a copolymer and a homopolymer as a function of copolymer composition. In addition, the interface width has been measured by neutron reflection. Four different experimental systems have been used, all containing styrene. Schnell et al. studied PS joined to random copolymers of styrene with bromostyrene and styrene with paramethyl styrene [17,18]. Benkoski et al. joined polystyrene to a random copolymer of styrene with vinyl pyridine (PS/PS-r-PVP) [16], whilst Brown joined PMMA to a random copolymer of styrene with methacrylate (PMMA/PS-r-PMMA) [15]. The results of the latter study are shown in Fig. 9. 

Drug Release from PHEMA-l-PIB Networks. Amphiphilic networks due to their distinct microphase separated hydrophobic-hydrophilic domain structure posses potential for biomedical applications. Similar microphase separated materials such as poly(HEMA- -styrene-6-HEMA), poly(HEMA-6-dimethylsiloxane- -HEMA), and poly(HEMA-6-butadiene- -HEMA) triblock copolymers have demonstrated better antithromogenic properties to any of the respective homopolymers (5-S). Amphiphilic networks are speculated to demonstrate better biocompatibility than either PIB or PHEMA because of their hydrophilic-hydrophobic microdomain structure. These unique structures may also be useful as swellable drug delivery matrices for both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs due to their amphiphilic nature. Preliminary experiments with theophylline as a model for a water soluble drug were conducted to determine the release characteristics of the system. Experiments with lipophilic drugs are the subject of ongoing research. 

This chapter is concerned with experiments and theory for semidilute and concentrated block copolymer solutions.The focus is on the thermodynamics, i.e. the phase behaviour of both micellar solutions and non-micellar (e.g. swollen lamellar) phases. The chapter is organized very simply Section 4.2 contains a general account of gelation in block copolymer solutions. Section 4.3 is concerned with the solution phase behaviour of poly(oxyethylene)-containing diblocks and tri-blocks. The phase behaviour of styrenic block copolymers in selective solvents is discussed in Section 4.4. Section 4.5 is then concerned with theories for ordered block copolymer solutions, including both non-micellar phases in semidilute solutions and micellar gels. There has been little work on the dynamics of semidilute and concentrated block copolymer solutions, and this is reflected by the limited discussion of this subject in this chapter. 

---