Student support teams

Lewis, Brock, and Lazarus (2002) emphasized the need for schools to be prepared to identify, refer, and intervene with students identified as needing interventions at the secondary and tertiary levels as early as possible. Student support teams, also commonly referred to as student assistance teams, help address the individual needs of at-risk students. Student support teams include teachers, special educators, interventionists, school counselors, agency providers, family, and other relevant school personnel. The student support team considers all relevant factors related to the whole child, including but not limited to health information and screenings, attendance, educational records, behavior and social/emotional functioning, academic performance in the classroom, and universal screening performance. 

Dwyer (2002) defined the responsibilities of the student support team as evaluating student academic and behavioral needs, consulting with teachers and families, and generating effective planned interventions (p. 174). The team approach is useful for gathering all relevant information and creating an intervention plan that can be carried through with consistency and integrity. 

Discuss your school s plan to meet the mental health needs of students. Does it involve a student support team, crisis response team, and/or threat assessment team What other components might be important in relation to prevention efforts at your school ... 

Evaluation activities of the ss-hs project in Baltimore have also helped schools and, in particular, student support teams (sst) identify their students needs. In order to help facilitate decision-making surrounding services for children, the bcpss recently required SSTS to exist within each school. The bcpss hopes that the ssts will coordinate all referrals for special services (except special education services, which existing child study teams handle) within a school. The sst consists of administrators, mental health professionals, teachers, and other school staff. School... 

The resources involved in the V-Chef example include the pilot team, the technical support team, and the students, as well as the infrastructure for the online course. 

A major thrust in the department is providing student support to retain students in the physical sciences. The focus is on each individual student each has a faculty advisor beginning their first semester. Resources are devoted to provide direct support for students in their first 2 years with a team of wizards, consisting of upper-level engineering students who will help any student studying in the sciences. Swarthmore s Lynn Molter called such students cross-pollinators. The engineering building is active at all hours and classes for non-majors are popular. 

Another important component of a successful inclusion project, according to Porter, is the district-based student services team , in which competent district-based educators act as consultants and provide support for headteachers, teachers and other staff They can also help in gaining access to additional resources and provide advice in monitoring and programme development. In view of the discussion above, their role is additionally to teach the mainstream about its competence. This team is a key component of the inclusion project being evaluated in Part II of this book. 

Concerns that disproportionate numbers of children with serious emotional disturbance were being removed from their communities led to the development of systems of care in the 1980s. In 1992, Congress passed the Comprehensive Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program which supported the development of these systems of care. A system of care is in or near the home and community. In fiilly developed systems of care, local public and private organizations work in teams with families and children to both plan and implement individualized services for each child s physical, emotional, social, educational, and family needs. Teams include family advocates and representatives fi om mental health, health, education, child welfare, juvenile justice, vocational rehabilitation, recreation, substance abuse, and other services. Systems of care have supported the use of mental health clinicians in schools, school- and community-based wraparound planning and services, and student support services (Woodruff et al., 1999). 

There is one catch. You will not find that problem to be very challenging, because you are the one who made it. So here is what you should do. Find a friend in the course, and each of you should make up 10 or 20 problems. Then you switch off with each other. You will find that this is a very effective method for studying. The larger your study group becomes, the more effective it will be. Don t be shy. You will need to w ork with a friend to get the practice that you need, not to mention the valuable peer support. If you are reading this book, then chances are that other students in your course have this book also. They will have the same need that you do. Team up with them. 

Considerable dialogue and collaboration between faculty members in the science and mathematics departments at UWG resulted in the development of a National Science Foundation (NSF) STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP) proposal to address the retention of students in the STEM disciplines and at the institution. This project included first-year learning communities (LCs), summer research experiences, additional in-class and out-of-class support using peer-lead team learning and/or supplemental instruction, and faculty development for participating STEM faculty members. As the centerpiece of the first-year LCs, three seminar courses were developed and will be the focus of this chapter. Here, we describe three first-year seminars, each of which addresses different facets of first-year STEM student success and report on the successes and challenges this model presented for both students and faculty members. 

The course ended with a mock trial. Students volunteered to be lawyers and expert witnesses. The students were divided into two teams, the defense and the prosecution, with specific roles to present evidence discovered in each class activity. Each student was required to turn in a written document summarizing his or her testimony supported by research. Furthermore, they presented the evidence, developed and defended their ideas, showed an understanding of the limitations of scientific data and its applicability to law and to appreciate the importance of integrating data analysis with communication skills. 

In its infancy the chemistry department had limited resources. Creative planning was key in providing the majors with a quality undergraduate experience. Research courses were developed in the chemistry department so that institutional supplies could be used to support student research students could also earn academic credit in the research courses. As a result some students received training grants, others earned academic credit, and still others volunteered to join a research team without receiving either. 

The V-Chef team must work out several issues, including how to locate qualified students and how technical support will be provided during the pilot. In addition, the team realizes that one of the metrics it chose level of skill at graduation) will make the pilot extremely long (an entire two-year program). So, it opts to replace this metric with one that can be measured earlier (percent of passing grades on first semester exams). 

---