Structure effects heterogeneous catalysis

In spite of the importance of having an accurate description of the real electrochemical environment for obtaining absolute values, it seems that for these systems many trends and relative features can be obtained within a somewhat simpler framework. To make use of the wide range of theoretical tools and models developed within the fields of surface science and heterogeneous catalysis, we will concentrate on the effect of the surface and the electronic structure of the catalyst material. Importantly, we will extend the analysis by introducing a simple technique to account for the electrode potential. Hence, the aim of this chapter is to link the successful theoretical surface science framework with the complicated electrochemical environment in a model simple enough to allow for the development of both trends and general conclusions. 

Large zeolite crystals with dimensions of tens and hundreds of micrometers have proven to be irreplaceable as model materials for reactivity and diffusion studies in the field of zeolite science and heterogeneous catalysis [1-3], These large crystallites often possesses complex structures consisting of several intergrown subunits and since the pore orientations of the different elements are not always aligned, this phenomenon can have a considerable effect on the accessibility of the pores in different crystallite regions [4]. 

The scale of components in complex condensed matter often results in structures having a high surface-area-to-volume ratio. In these systems, interfacial effects can be very important. The interfaces between vapor and condensed phases and between two condensed phases have been well studied over the past four decades. These studies have contributed to technologies from electronic materials and devices, to corrosion passivation, to heterogeneous catalysis. In recent years, the focus has broadened to include the interfaces between vapors, liquids, or solids and self-assembled structures of organic, biological, and polymeric nature. 

The central issue which has to be addressed in any comprehensive study of electrode-surface phenomena is the determination of an unambiguous correlation between interfacial composition, interfacial structure, and interfacial reactivity. This principal concern is of course identical to the goal of fundamental studies in heterogeneous catalysis at gas-solid interfaces. However, electrochemical systems are far more complicated since a full treatment of the electrode-solution interface must incorporate not only the compact (inner) layer but also the boundary (outer) layer of the electrical double-layer. The effect of the outer layer on electrode reactions has been neglected in most surface electrochemical studies but in certain situations, such as in conducting polymers and... 

In non-electrochemical heterogeneous catalysis, the interface between the catalyst and the gas phase can often be characterized using a wide variety of spectroscopic probes. Differences between reaction conditions and the UHV conditions used in many studies have been probed extensively 8 as have differences between polycrystalline and single-crystalline materials. Nevertheless, the adsorbate-substrate interactions can often be characterized in the absence of pressure effects. Therefore, UHY based surface science techniques are able to elucidate the surface structures and energetics of the heterogeneous catalysis of gas phase molecules. 

The combined use of the modem tools of surface science should allow one to understand many fundamental questions in catalysis, at least for metals. These tools afford the experimentalist with an abundance of information on surface structure, surface composition, surface electronic structure, reaction mechanism, and reaction rate parameters for elementary steps. In combination they yield direct information on the effects of surface structure and composition on heterogeneous reactivity or, more accurately, surface reactivity. Consequently, the origin of well-known effects in catalysis such as structure sensitivity, selective poisoning, ligand and ensemble effects in alloy catalysis, catalytic promotion, chemical specificity, volcano effects, to name just a few, should be subject to study via surface science. In addition, mechanistic and kinetic studies can yield information helpful in unraveling results obtained in flow reactors under greatly different operating conditions. 

The old and lasting problem of heterogeneous catalysis, the mechanism of alkene hydrogenation, has also been approached from the viewpoint of structure effects on rate. In 1925, Lebedev and co-workers (80) had already noted that the velocity of the hydrogenation of the C=C bond decreases with the number of substituents on both carbon atoms. The same conclusion can be drawn from the narrower series of alkenes studied by Schuster (8J) (series 52 in Table IV). Recently authors have tried to analyze this influence of substituents in a more detailed way, in order to find out whether the change in rate is caused by polar or steric effects and whether the substituents affect mostly the adsorptivity of the unsaturated compounds or the reaetivity of the adsorbed species. Linear relationships have been used for quantitative treatment. 

The study of heterogeneous catalysis with the emphasis on the effects of reactant structure stimulates consideration of the reacting system in terms of mutual interactions. Modification of the catalyst surface by the action of reactants is a part of these interactions. This idea is not new, but hitherto little evidence supported it now it is an inherent component of the accepted mechanism of elimination reactions. In general, the working surface may be quite different from the initial surface. Even the solvent may participate in the mechanism, as the results of the Delft school (125, 161, 162) indicate, by temporally accommodating hydrogen species formed in a reaction step from the reactants or hydrogen molecules on the surface. 

The philosophy used to develop detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms for gas-phase reactions can, in principle, be extended to treat heterogeneous reactions, provided diffusion is also considered in the final analysis. Clearly, the problem in heterogeneous catalysis is considerably more complex because of the close proximity of a large number of atoms and their collective effect on reaction kinetics and mechanisms, and the inevitable variation of catalyst structure with time—for example, as a result of sintering and poisoning. 

On the other hand, hi- or multi-metallic supported systems have been attracting considerable interest in research into heterogeneous catalysis as a possible way to modulate the catalytic properties of the individual monometalUc counterparts [12, 13]. These catalysts usually show new catalytic properties that are ascribed to geometric and/or electronic effects between the metalUc components. Of special interest is the preparation of supported bimetallic catalysts using metal carbonyls as precursors, since the milder conditions used, when compared with conventional methods, can render catalysts with homogeneous bimetallic entities of a size and composition not usually achieved when conventional salts are employed as precursors. The use of these catalysts as models can lead to elucidation of the relationships between the structure and catalytic behavior of bimetalUc catalysts. 

This chapter is not intended to furnish a comprehensive review of the latest theoretical developments across all types of reaction and catalyst in heterogeneous catalysis. It will instead briefly survey two cross-cutting themes that have in recent years benefited substantially from theoretical insights, especially what first-principles DFT calculations have been able to explain and predict, and that are commanding substantial current interest the design of new catalysts aided by theoretical insights and the elucidation of the molecular level effects of reactive physiochemical environments on catalytic reactivity. The relatively simple and predictable structure of metals... 

It took some time to adopt a similar view of other heterogeneous elimination and substitution reactions. Most efficient experimental tools have been found in stereochemical studies, correlation of structure effects on rates and measurement of deuterium kinetic isotope effects. The usual kinetic studies were not of much help due to the complex nature of catalytic reactions and relatively large experimental error. The progress has been made possible also by the studies of surface acid—base properties of the solids and their meaning for catalysis (for a detailed treatment see ref. 5). 

An interesting alternative that combines the advantages of both classical and quantum mechanics is to use hybrid QM/MM models, first introduced by Arieh Warshel for modeling enzymatic reactions [7]. Here, the chemical species at the active site are treated using high-level (and therefore expensive) QM models, which are coupled to a force field that describes the reaction environment. Hybrid models can thus take into account solvent effects in homogeneous catalysis, support structure and interface effects in heterogeneous catalysis, and enzyme structure effects in biocatalysis. 

Thanks to their speed and relatively low computational cost, M D and MC simulations can be used for studying the physical properties of large systems. This is extremely useful in heterogeneous catalysis, e.g., for modeling the structure and the properties of the bulk and the surface of a solid catalyst, or the properties of the bulk and interface of liquid/liquid biphasic systems. However, since the number of particles modeled is still very small compared to real materials, the models are susceptible to wall effects. One neat trick for avoiding this problem is to apply periodic boundary conditions The volume containing the model is treated as the primitive cell of an... 

All electrodes react with their environment via the surfaces in ways which will determine their electrochemical performance. Properly selected surface modification can effectively enhance the electrode heterogeneous catalysis property, especially selectivity and activity. The bulk materials can be chosen to provide mechanical, chemical, electrical, and structural integrity. In this part, several surface modification methods will be introduced in terms of metal film deposition, metal ion implantation, electrochemical activation, organic surface coating, nanoparticle deposition, glucose oxidase (GOx) enzyme-modified electrode, and DNA-modified electrode. 

---