Sodium dodecyl sulfate test

Axford, D.W.E., McDermott, E.E., and Redman, D.G. 1979. Note on the sodium dodecyl sulfate test of breadmaking quality Comparison with Pelshenke and Zeleny tests. Cereal Chem. 56,... 

In an extensive study by Read et al. [93], 10 anionic surfactants were evaluated for their ability to remove pyritic sulfur and ash from ultrafine Illinois no. 5 coal by flotation processes. The authors observed that of the commercially available surfactants, sodium dodecyl sulfate was the most effective on either a weight or a molar basis, followed by a linear AOS (average molweight 272) and alkylpolyethoxylated sulfonates. Of the noncommercial surfactants tested, -(E -b-dodecene-b-suIfonate (f0) was the most effective and better than any commercial surfactant on a dosage/recovery basis. 

Zhong et al. (2003) studied the apparent solubility of trichloroethylene in aqueous solutions, where the experimental variables were surfactant type and cosolvent concentration. The surfactants used in the experiment were sodium dihexyl sulfo-succinte (MA-80), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), polyoxyethylene 20 (POE 20), sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80), and a mixture of Surfonic- PE2597 and Witconol-NPIOO. Isopropanol was used as the alcohol cosolvent. Eigure 8.20 shows the results of a batch experiment studying the effects of type and concentration of surfactant on solubilization of trichloroethylene in aqueous solutions. A correlation between surfactant chain length and solubilization rate may explain this behavior. However, the solubilization rate constants decrease with surfactant concentration. Addition of the cosolvent isopropanol to MA-80 increased the solubility of isopropanol at each surfactant concentration but did not demonstrate any particular trend in solubilization rate of isopropanol for the other surfactants tested. In the case of anionic surfactants (MA-80 and SDS), the solubility and solubilization rate increase with increasing electrolyte concentration for all surfactant concentrations. 

One of the most widely used forms of gel electrophoresis is known as sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Polyacrylamide gel has several advantages that account for its extensive use. It has minimal adsorptive properties and produces a negligible electroosmotic effect (Hjelmeland and Chrambach 1981). In identity tests, for the determination of molecular weight, SDS-PAGE has been shown to be an appropriate, fast, and easy method that is often used in quality control laboratories. The use of SDS-PAGE followed by a densitometric analysis, such as MS, is a helpful technique for the determination of peptide or... 

Use the data for sodium dodecyl sulfate in Table 8.1 to test the equation developed in Example 8.1 and to evaluate a for these micelles. Criticize or defend the following proposition The a... 

To test the hypothesis, aliquots of 5.0 mM adenine derivative were mixed with aliquots of 5.0 mM thymine derivative in proportions shown in the table. Each solution also contained 20 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate. The concentration of product measured by nuclear magnetic resonance also is shown in the table. Are the results consistent with formation of a 1 1 complex Explain your answer. 

The results are shown in Figure 27. It can be seen the all the anionics tested show significant effects of the combination with SAE on their sequestering ability. For this effect, the optimum EO mole number for each anionic is different. Since the combination of LAS with STPP gives a calcium ion sequestering ability of only 165 mg/g-detergents by this procedure, the combination of SAE with LAS(Linear Alkyl-benzene Sulfonate), AOS (4-Olefin Sulfonate), SAS(Secondary Alkane Sulfonate) or SDS (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate) would be recommended for use in heavy-duty detergents. 

The two most widely used types of electrophoresis tests are (i) sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and (ii) isoelectric focusing (IEF). 

Prehybridization/hybridization buffer 50% deionized formamide, 5 X SSC (standard saline citrate), 8 X Denhardt s solution, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 250 fig/ml denatured herring testes DNA, and 500 ng/ml yeast RNA (for the composition of SSC buffer and Denhardt s solution, see, e.g., Ausubel et al.13)... 

Comeal organ culture combined with objectively quantifiable assays for comeal epithelial barrier disruption reduces the high variability associated to the subjectively scored Draize Test. The FITC-Dextran retention has been studied as a quantitative evaluation of the comeal epithelial barrier (Lopez et al. 1991) following chemical exposure of bcnzal konium chloride (BAC), Polyquad, and Thimerosal. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) has also been tested for disruption of the tight junctions via FITC-Dextran retention assay. However, as an objective outcome measure for ocular toxicity, the scoring system is not yet quantitatively comparable for assessment of ocular irritancy to multiple test products. This limitation is similar to surface biotinylation assays. As fluorometry is utilized more extensively in varied laboratories with numerous test chemicals a standardized scoring system can be elicited similar to the familiar Draize Test. 

Test for coupling measurement of activity associated with washed matrix column chromatography polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate Concanavalin A-Sepharose chromatography... 

---