Serotonin tricyclic antidepressant effects

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) such as amitriptyline and doxepin have been used with some success in the treatment of IBS-related pain (Table 18-5). They modulate pain principally through their effect on neurotransmitter reuptake, especially norepinephrine and serotonin. Their helpfulness in functional gastrointestinal disorders seems independent of mood-altering effects normally associated with these agents. Low-dose TCAs (e.g., amitriptyline, desipramine, or doxepin 10 to 25 mg daily) may help patients with IBS who predominantly experience diarrhea or pain. 

Dizziness, vertigo, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and lethargy are all relatively common adverse events. These effects are more pronounced for several days after initiation and following upward dose titration. Seizures have been reported rarely the risk is dose-related and appears to increase with concomitant use of antidepressants, such as tricyclic antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Tramadol should be avoided in patients receiving monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors because tramadol inhibits the uptake of norepinephrine and serotonin. 

In many clinical trials a positive control of a clinically established drug is often used for comparison purposes for example, a novel selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), may be compared with a more established tricyclic antidepressant, such as imipramine. The aim is to see whether the new SSRI is more efficacious or has fewer adverse side effects than the more established tricyclic (Chapter 12). In many such comparisons the new and older treatments are equally efficacious at relieving depression, but the newer drugs display fewer side effects this means that they are better tolerated by patients, so that they are more willing to continue taking the tablets. The high rates of compliance also mean that, in overall terms, newer drugs with fewer side effects tend to be more efficacious. 

Until the introduction of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the 1980s, tricyclic antidepressants were the most widely used drugs. The therapeutic effect of amitriptyline and imipramine are related to their ability to inhibit the presynaptic reuptake of both NA and 5-HT. They are referred to as non-selective reuptake inhibitors, whereas many of the other tricyclics are more selective thus, clomipramine is a selective reuptake inhibitor for 5-HT and desipramine and nortriptyline are selective... 

In addition to this serious diet-drug interaction, irreversible MAOIs also potentiate the effects of sympathomimetic drugs like ephedrine found in over-the-counter cold remedies and recreational stimulants like amphetamine. The MAOIs also interact with drugs that increase synaptic concentrations of 5-HT, such as the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine and the herbal SSRI antidepressant St John s wort (Hypericum spp.). The resulting serotonin syndrome is characterised by hyperthermia and muscle rigidity. While devoid of these side effects the reversible MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide has yet to establish itself as a first-line alternative to the SSRIs. 

A number of medications used in the treatment of anxiety have effects on serotonin neurotransmission (Ch. 13). These medications include tricyclic antidepressant medications, SSRIs, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). However, because these medications take weeks to exert their full anxiolytic effects, it is unlikely that blocking the reuptake (and thus increasing synaptic levels) of either serotonin or norepinephrine selectively is responsible for their anxiolytic properties — rather it is suspected that the therapeutic effects are due to changes in gene expression, protein levels, and eventually changes in synaptic connections between neurons. 

There are numerous antidepressant medications on the market (table 7.1). Following development of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors were tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and several atypical antidepressants (Baldessarini 1996). Successive generations of antidepressants have not necessarily become more effective in treating depression, but rather offer more favorable side-effect profiles—a crucial factor in effective clinical pharmacotherapy. An effective medication is not useful if its side effects are intolerable. 

Psychiatric medicines exert multiple effects for two principal reasons. First, they usually interact with more than one receptor type. There are two ways to look at this. You will often hear a medication with multiple receptor interactions called a dirty drug. This is because the more receptor interactions it has, the more effects, and hence side effects, it produces. As a result, great effort has been made to develop newer medications with fewer receptor interactions and, thus, fewer side effects. This effort has been quite successful with antidepressants, as we have moved from the effective but side effect-laden tricyclic antidepressants to newer antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. 

The traditional scheme is complicated by the fact that some antidepressants exhibit characteristics of more than one class. For example, clomipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) with side effects and toxicity similar to other TCAs, works more like the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRls). Similarly, venlafaxine and duloxetine, which are usually grouped with the atypical antidepressants, have a side effect and safety profile comparable to the SSRls. Although a classihcation system based on mechanism of action offers some advantage (see Table 3.7), even this scheme is limited by the fact that antidepressants that work in the same way may have widely divergent side effect and safety profiles. In the following discussion, the traditional classification system is adopted. Although fraught with problems and inconsistencies. 

Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs). The tricyclic antidepressants are believed to act mainly by increasing norepinephrine and/or serotonin reuptake inhibition. The few studies that have evaluated their use in the treatment of BPD were not promising. Given those disappointing results in conjunction with the prominent side effects and danger in overdose, TCAs are not generally recommended for the treatment of BPD. 

Serendipity has played a major role in the discovery of most classes of psychotropic drugs. For example, the observation that the first antidepressants, the tricyclic antidepressants and the monoamine oxidase inhibitors, impeded the reuptake of biogenic amines into brain slices, or inhibited their metabolism, following their acute administration to rats, provided the experimenter with a mechanism that could be easily investigated in vitro. Such methods led to the development of numerous antidepressants that differed in their potency, and to some extent in their side effects (for example, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) but did little to further the development of novel antidepressants showing greater therapeutic efficacy. The accidental discovery of atypical antidepressants such as mianserin led to the broadening of the basis of the animal models... 

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants are equally effective. Hov/ever, SSRIs tend to have fewer antimuscarinic side-effects and are less cardiotoxic in case of overdosage. SSRIs tend to cause gastrointestinal side-effects. Both SSRIs and tricylic antidepressants exhibit a time lag before the action of the antidepressants becomes effective. 

Citalopram is a selective serotonin re-uptoke inhibitor (SSRI). These tend to have fewer ontimuscarinic effects than tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) drugs, such as dry mouth and constipation however, SSRIs tend to cause gastrointestinal effects, such as nausea and vomiting. MAOIs are monoamine oxidase inhibitors. 

It is believed that tricyclic antidepressants inhibit the (neuronal) reuptake of norepinephrine (noradrenaline) and/or serotonin by presynaptic nerve endings, thus blocking one of the leading mechanisms of their inactivation, and thereby increasing the concentration of the indicated amines potentiating their effects. It should be noted that, as a rule, secondary amines, which are representatives of tricyclic antidepressants, exhibit high activity, blocking the neuronal reuptake of norepinephrine, while tertiary amines act more on the neuronal reuptake of serotonin. 

The neurochemical effects of the tricyclic antidepressants are blockade of the re-uptake of norepinephrine and for some drugs also serotonin by nerve terminals in the CNS and peripherally. This reuptake inhibition results in higher concentrations of the neurotransmitters at their receptors sites. There is little or no effect on DA neurotransmission. The tricyclic antidepressants have varying affinities for U2... 

Agents from this class of antidepressants are selective blockers of the re-uptake of serotonin at presynaptic neurones and have little if any effects on muscarinic, histaminergic, adrenergic or serotonergic receptors. They are as effective as the tricyclic antidepressants in the management of depressive disorders, but have less cardiovascular effects. They have less anticholinergic activity and because of their lower risk of cardiotoxicity in overdose they... 

Tricyclic antidepressants are used for treatment of chronic pain. The mechanism of action supposedly is related to their activity at the sodium channel. It also is hypothesized that tricyclic antidepressants affect norepinephrine release and, possibly, serotonin release, thereby altering spinothalamic transmission of pain. However patients who require higher doses often find that the pain relief obtained is not adequate to justify the adverse effects. 

Serotonin-specific inhibitors (SSRI) include fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram and others. They are not more effective than the tricyclic antidepressants but may suit some patients better and are generally safer in overdose (see Geddes et al., 1999). While the SSRIs are devoid of the cardiac effects (membrane stabilisation, inhibition of conduction) of the tricyclics in overdose, they increase the risk of hemorrhage into the gut or brain. 

In trials of hospitalized patients tricyclic antidepressants have generally been more efficacious than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Otherwise there are no overall differences between the drugs in terms of tolerability or efficacy in primary care settings. After reviewing 15 trials it was concluded that drags are effective in the treatment of dysthymia with no differences between and within class of drugs. Tricyclic antidepressants are more likely to cause adverse events and dropouts. As dysthymia is a chronic condition, there remains little information on quality of life and medium or longterm outcome. 

Antidepressant drugs, such as the tricyclic antidepressants and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are very important for the treatment of psychotic depression (see Chapter 34). They have been shown to be effective when used in the treatment of several anxiety disorders, including general anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and several phobias, including agoraphobia. Because the SSRIs are less toxic than the tricyclic antidepressants, their use in the treatment of anxiety is safer and less likely to produce serious side effects. 

TCA, tricyclic antidepressant SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor MAOI, monoamine oxidase inhibitor. 0, no effect +, + +, + + + indicate increasing effect. 

Tricyclic antidepressant medications were developed in the 1950s and 1960s. Because they affect multiple neurotransmitters in the brain, they are thought to have more side effects than the newer class of SSRIs, which target the specific neurotransmitter serotonin. 

Mechanism of Action A tricyclic antidepressant that blocks the reuptake of neu-retransmitters, including norepinephrine and serotonin, at presynaptic membranes, thus increasing their availability at postsynaptic receptor sites. Also has strong anticholinergic activity. Therapeutic Effect Relieves depression. 

---