Sensitivity and limit of detection

The quantitation of analytes at concentrations close to the limit of detection can result in quite large errors, because of contributions to the measurement from noise. Sometimes these errors can be so large that a useful limit of quantitation may be defined, which is typically three times or more the limit of detection. This is rather dependent on the analytical precision that is required. 

---

Biopolymers are employed in many immunological techniques, including the analysis of food, clinical samples, pesticides, and in other areas of analytical chemistry. Immunoassays (qv) are specific, sensitive, relatively easy to perform, and usually inexpensive. For repetitive analyses, immunoassays compare very favorably with many conventional methods in terms of both sensitivity and limits of detection. 

Validation work indudes the determination of within-batch and between-batch imprecision, linearity, sensitivity and limit of detection - which can be carried off with any suitable spedmen. However, to demonstrate the accuracy of the procedure, to investigate possible interferences and to establish reference ranges, it is necessary to analyze RMs with known concentrations, ideally using certified materials. Where none are available, accuracy may be assessed using other approaches, but these are less reliable and are more complicated to perform (Taylor 1995). 

The comparison of sensitivity and limits of detection achievable in ILMs and crystalline matrices have led to inconsistent results in different studies. For the measurement of peptides, a number of groups have reported comparable or even increased sensitivities in ILMs in positive [16,50] or negative ion mode [39], whereas others have reported decreased sensitivities [40]. For oligonucleotides [41], phospholipids [48], again increased sensitivities have been reported. For low-molecular weight analytes like sugars, decreased [40] or comparable limits of detection have been found [38]. 

CONTENTS 1. Chemometrics and the Analytical Process. 2. Precision and Accuracy. 3. Evaluation of Precision and Accuracy. Comparison of Two Procedures. 4. Evaluation of Sources of Variation in Data. Analysis of Variance. 5. Calibration. 6. Reliability and Drift. 7. Sensitivity and Limit of Detection. 8. Selectivity and Specificity. 9. Information. 10. Costs. 11. The Time Constant. 12. Signals and Data. 13. Regression Methods. 14. Correlation Methods. 15. Signal Processing. 16. Response Surfaces and Models. 17. Exploration of Response Surfaces. 18. Optimization of Analytical Chemical Methods. 19. Optimization of Chromatographic Methods. 20. The Multivariate Approach. 21. Principal Components and Factor Analysis. 22. Clustering Techniques. 23. Supervised Pattern Recognition. 24. Decisions in the Analytical Laboratory. 

In the first instrument, sensitivity and limits of detection were constrained by the total ion beam current measured after the extraction region of the TOF-MS [42]. Although pulser circuitry limited the repetition rate to 7.1 kHz and a duty factor of 3.5%, detection limits ranged from 0.03 to 3 ppb using ultrasonic nebuliza-tion [16]. Mahoney et al. later reported on improvements to the same orthogonal ICP-TOF-MS [29]. The use of a commercial skimmer cone and quadrupole doublet in the extraction optics led to an increase in primary ion current from 2 nA to 50 nA [29]. This, along with electronic improvements allowing a 16-kHz spectral-repetition rate, dropped limits of detection to 1-10 ppt when ultrasonic nebuliza-tion was utilized. 

They are now many modifications of different sensitivity and limit of detection (Utiger 1979, Spencer 2004). In the endocrine safety pharmacology in rats and dogs, the TRH test injection with measurement of the serum TSH response is an established tool for assessment of changes at the level of thyroid hormone secretion, with consecutive modification of the pituitary TSH and prolactin response. 

Fluorescence-based measurements are already very sensitive and widely used in bio-medical analysis. However, the metallic nanostructures provide further improvement on the sensitivity and limit of detections through the enhancement of the local field. Therefore, a large number of researchers are dedicated to developing substrates for SEFS [46-52]. The effect of the geometrical parameter of the nanostructure on the efficiency of the SEFS is well illustrated in Fig. 9. In this case, the SEFS enhancement factor (SEFS enhancement factor) is plotted against the periodicity of the arrays of nanoholes in gold films. The experiments were realized by spin-coating the arrays of nanoholes with a polystyrene film doped with the oxazine 720 [48]. 

Assuming Fickian diffusion in the film, the time to reach equilibrium is proportional to the square of film thickness, so thinner films respond more rapidly at the expense of lower sensitivity and limit of detection. Regardless of the rate-limiting mechanism, response time invariably improves with increasing temperature. 

Norrod KL, Sudnik LM, Rousell D, Rowlen KL (1997) Quantitative comparison of five SERS substrates sensitivity and limit of detection. Appl Spectrosc 51(7) 994-1001... 

As stated above, most users of the headspace technique make no distinction between dynamic HS and PT. In one of the few publications that distinguished and compared these two HS modes, dynamic HS and PT were assessed as steps preceding high-resolution GC-electron capture detection for the determination of nitrous oxide in sea water. The process was found to exhibit a first-order kinetics in both cases and the matrix to exert a significant effect that was proportional to the nitrous oxide concentration in bidistilled water, as well as in synthetic and natural sea water. As expected, PT provided better extraction recovery, sensitivity and limits of detection — which fell in the pico-mole-per-millilitre range [46]. 

Electrochemical analysis methods assure, generally, the most reliable analytical information because of the simplicity of the sampling process which includes (1) sample dissolution in water or in organic solvents and (2) the possibility of measuring directly and continuously the activity of the species present in the solutions. The preconcentration step is not necessary, because of the sensitivities and limits of detection that characterize the electrochemical methods. The determined species are not necessary to be converted to other measurable species. The electrochemical methods can be successfully used for in vivo monitoring. Spectrometric analysis methods, on the other hand, nearly always require a complex sampling process because of the presence of interfering species. Therapy is necessary to adopt the best separation techniques that can assure, for each analytical method, the most reliable analytical information. Nondestructive techniques are used especially for environmental analysis, and surface analysis assures the best reliability of the analytical information. 

Despite their high cost and the long process involved in their development, immunochemical techniques may soon have broad applicability in the environmental field. Antibody production is the key step of any immunochemical technique. Immunosensors yield the best results for pesticides determination104 in terms of both accuracy and reliability. The most reliable immunosensors are piezoelectric. They assure a good sensitivity and limit of detection.105 The main problem for piezoelectric immunosensors utilization for water analysis is their low sensitivity, which results in a decrease in the S/N ratio because of the impurities present in water (from matrix or other sources). 

QC material should be prepared in drug-free plasma containing the same anticoagulant as the samples to be tested. In addition, it is advisable to assess the sensitivity and limit of detection with different matrices using your own LC-MS/MS system. This may differ between matrices and have consequences for the precision and accuracy of detection of the assay. 

Guenther, D, Longerich, H. P., Jackson, S. E., and Forsythe, L. (1996). Effect of sampler orifice diameter on dry plasma inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) backgrounds, sensitivities, and limits of detection using laser ablation sample introduction, fresemus /. Anal. Chem. 355(7-8), 771. 

---