Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Self-inoculation

Make a habit of keeping your hands away from your mouth, nose, eyes, and any other mucous membranes. This reduces the possibility of self-inoculation. [Pg.33]

Studies using human subjects have also established that self-inoculation with rhinovirus- and rotavirus-contaminated fingers can lead to infection [11,12], Whether or not sufficient virus can be exchanged and subsequently acquired by the susceptible host obviously depends on a range of factors. Virus transfer can be promoted by moist conditions, as well as by increased friction and pressure... [Pg.398]

Inclusion conjunctivitis A chlamydial infection that can result from self-inoculation with Chlamydia trachomatis. [Pg.1147]

Jones DP (1996) Accidental self inoculation with oil based veterinary vaccines. NZ Med J 109 363-365 Kusaka Y (1993) Occupational diseases caused by exposure to sensitizing metals. Jpn J Ind Health 35 75-87 Lambert D, Terrussot MC, Dalac S, Boulitrop-Morvan C (1995) Granulome a la laine de brebis. Ann Dermatol Venereol 122 534-535... [Pg.136]

Nusbaum BP, Gulpas N, Horwitz SN (1983) Sporotrichosis acquired from a cat. J Am Acad Dermatol 8 386-391 Patterson CJ, LaVenture M, Hurley SS, Davis JP (1988) Accidental self-inoculation with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis (Johne s bacterin) by veterinarians in Wisconsin. JAVMA 192 1197-1199... [Pg.1116]

To illustrate the potential risks to a laboratory worker who handles cancer viruses, consider a statement made by the National Cancer Institute The most likely candidate for laboratory-acquired human cancer is the predisposed person self-inoculated with or inhaling a highly concentrated viral preparation (477). Other types of research present... [Pg.303]

J. Gulasekharam, Illness following accidental self-inoculation of Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccine, Med. J. Aust., 1970, 2, 642. [Pg.282]

Hours after inoculation of self-induced anaerobic culture. Organelle identified by peak of marker enzyme activity. [Pg.865]

Casein is the material that curdles when acid is added to skim milk. Most of us think of it as cottage cheese. It normally comprises about 3% of the weight of whole milk. Since the type of acid used for curdling has a noticeable effect on the quality and purity of casein, it is normally classified as lactic, hydrochloric, or sulfuric acid material. Lactic acid casein is the product of natural self-souring, although this is normally promoted by inoculating skim milk with lactobacillus. A small portion of casein is produced by the rennet process. This material is... [Pg.441]

Animals need to be bathed with copious amounts of soap and water. If dermal decontamination is not implemented quickly, mustard will react with the skin and cannot be easily removed (Sidell et al, 1997). Sodium thiosulfate (2.5% solution) can be used dermally to neutralize mustard exposures (Garigan, 1996). Animals may also be bathed with dilute (0.5%) hypochlorite solutions (Borak and Sidell, 1992). Monitor for dermal bums. Secondary infection is common. Topical silver sulfadiazine can be applied to all bums and an Ehzabethan collar placed to decrease ingestion of the ointment and self trauma. Topically applied dexa-methasone and diclofenac reduced inflammation in a mouse model when applied within 4 h (Dachir et al, 2004). All equine and ovine patients should be inoculated with tetanus toxoid. Vaccination of other species should be determined on a case by case basis. [Pg.724]

Some speculate that ACAID-based immunotherapy may be beneficial in immune-media ted diseases of the eye and a variety of other organs. This is due to the fact that the immune deviation of ACAID produces T regulatory cells that are effective in inhibiting both Thl and Th2 responses (both primary and secondary responses). Cell d-reac tive NKT cell-dependent tolerance or ACAID induced by inoculation of antigen into the eye may contribute to self-tolerance and prevention of autoimmune responses in organs and tissues in general. [Pg.48]

The USP describes two general methods for conducting the test the direct transfer, or direct inoculation, method and the membrane filtration method. As the name indicates, the direct inoculation method involves the aseptic transfer of a sample of test product solution into the sterility test growth medium. To use this method, it must first be demonstrated that the product solution itself does not inhibit the growth of typical indicator microorganisms specified in the USP method. It should be self-evident why it is important to perform testing to negate the chance of product inhibition of possible microbial contaminants, as this is the purpose of the sterility test. The direct inoculation method, while not theoretically complex, requires the utmost technical precision and aseptic manipulation techniques for proper execution. As a consequence of the repetitive motions involved, it is prone to human error. [Pg.284]

During the lag phase, the cells inoculated into a new medium self-adjust to the new environment and begin to synthesize the enzymes and components necessary for growth. The number of cells does not increase during this period. The duration of the lag phase depends on the type of cells, the age and number of inoculated cells, their adaptability to the new culture conditions, and other factors. For example, if cells already growing in the exponential growth phase are inoculated into... [Pg.49]

Although PrP-res is associated with TSE infectivity and has, at the biochemical level at least, some limited self-propagating activity, important questions remain about the PrP-only prion model for the TSE agent. For instance, why has no one been able to demonstrate the model s most basic prediction, that is, that PrP-sen alone can be induced to convert to an infectious agent that causes TSE disease when inoculated into animals Inoculation of a synthetic PrP peptide has induced a TSE-like disease in transgenic mice expressing a familial TSE associated mutant PrP, but the serial transmissibility of this disease remains to be determined (Kaneko et al, 2000). Why are 100,000 PrP-res molecules present per infectious unit Why is PrP-res not always found in infectious tissues (Lasmezas et al, 1997) Why are nucleic acids (Akowitz et al,... [Pg.162]


See other pages where Self-inoculation is mentioned: [Pg.203]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.796]    [Pg.796]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.305]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.9 , Pg.221 , Pg.297 ]




SEARCH



Inoculation

© 2024 chempedia.info