Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Schottky Barrier Devices

Fig. 10.6. Examples of the forward bias current-voltage characteristics of p-i-n sensors, compared to a Schottky barrier device. Fig. 10.6. Examples of the forward bias current-voltage characteristics of p-i-n sensors, compared to a Schottky barrier device.
Although only the impurities in the scr can be detected by DLTS, it is always possible to increase the reverse-bias voltage to increase the scr width. It is difficult, however, to pulse to high voltages. Therefore, the width is ultimately limited by voltage breakdown considerations. Then, one can etch the wafer repeatedly, form Schottky barrier devices each time and measure to profile the N concentration. [Pg.31]

Fig. 14 Transient currents from a junction recovery experiment for a Ti02 - Schottky barrier device [60]. The currents are dependent on injection level, and tend to a power law at long times, as expected for dispersive transport. Fig. 14 Transient currents from a junction recovery experiment for a Ti02 - Schottky barrier device [60]. The currents are dependent on injection level, and tend to a power law at long times, as expected for dispersive transport.
Another important result is the dependence of the band-gap of semiconducting carbon nanotubes on the tube diameter. The band-gap of a semiconducting nanotube is inversely proportional to its diameter [22]. Because carbon nanotubes of different geometries exhibit different electrical characteristics, the connection of a metallic nanotube with a semiconducting nanotube will result in a Schottky barrier device, and the connection of two different semiconducting tubes will result in a heterojunction structure [30]. These structures have been shown to exhibit asymmetric electtical properties, both in carbon nanotubes and in traditional CMOS circuits [31], The usefulness of these structures in present-day circuits underscores how useful carbon nanotubes may be in the development of next-generation electrical devices [32,33]. [Pg.158]

Parker [55] studied the IN properties of MEH-PPV sandwiched between various low-and high work-function materials. He proposed a model for such photodiodes, where the charge carriers are transported in a rigid band model. Electrons and holes can tunnel into or leave the polymer when the applied field tilts the polymer bands so that the tunnel barriers can be overcome. It must be noted that a rigid band model is only appropriate for very low intrinsic carrier concentrations in MEH-PPV. Capacitance-voltage measurements for these devices indicated an upper limit for the dark carrier concentration of 1014 cm"3. Further measurements of the built in fields of MEH-PPV sandwiched between metal electrodes are in agreement with the results found by Parker. Electro absorption measurements [56, 57] showed that various metals did not introduce interface states in the single-particle gap of the polymer that pins the Schottky contact. Of course this does not imply that the metal and the polymer do not interact [58, 59] but these interactions do not pin the Schottky barrier. [Pg.278]

M.S. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Wiley-lnterscience, New York 1981 B. L. Sliarma (Ed.) Metal-Semiconductor Schottky Barrier Junctions and Their Applications, Plenum Press, New York 1984. [Pg.480]

A polymer layer al a contact can enhance current How by serving as a transport layer. The transport layer could have an increased carrier mobility or a reduced Schottky barrier. For example, consider an electron-only device made from the two-polymer-layer structure in the top panel of Figure 11-13 but using an electron contact on the left with a 0.5 eV injection barrier and a hole contact on the right with a 1.2 cV injection barrier. For this case the electron current is contact limited and thermionic emission is the dominant injection mechanism for a bias less than about 20 V. The electron density near the electron injecting contact is therefore given by... [Pg.505]

Friend et at. studied the influence of electrodes with different work-functions on the performance of PPV photodiodes 143). For ITO/PPV/Mg devices the fully saturated open circuit voltage was 1.2 V and 1.7 V for an ITO/PPV/Ca device. These values for the V c are almost equal to the difference in the work-function of Mg and Ca with respect to 1TO. The open circuit voltage of the ITO/PPV/A1 device observed at 1.2 V, however, is considerably higher than the difference of the work-function between ITO and Al. The Cambridge group references its PPV with a very low dark carrier concentration and consequently the formation of Schottky barriers at the PPV/Al interface is not expected. The mobility of the holes was measured at KT4 cm2 V-1 s l [62] and that for the electrons is expected to be clearly lower. [Pg.590]

An important step toward the understanding and theoretical description of microwave conductivity was made between 1989 and 1993, during the doctoral work of G. Schlichthorl, who used silicon wafers in contact with solutions containing different concentrations of ammonium fluoride.9 The analytical formula obtained for potential-dependent, photoin-duced microwave conductivity (PMC) could explain the experimental results. The still puzzling and controversial observation of dammed-up charge carriers in semiconductor surfaces motivated the collaboration with a researcher (L. Elstner) on silicon devices. A sophisticated computation program was used to calculate microwave conductivity from basic transport equations for a Schottky barrier. The experimental curves could be matched and it was confirmed for silicon interfaces that the analytically derived formulas for potential-dependent microwave conductivity were identical with the numerically derived nonsimplified functions within 10%.10... [Pg.441]

Fig. 11. Schottky diode device used for measurement of chemicurrents. Highly exoergic surface reactions like adsorption of an atom to the surface produce excited electrons and holes. Some of these electrons are able to surmount the Schottky barrier and arrive at the semiconductor conduction band. This results in a detectable chemicurrent. (From Ref. 64.)... Fig. 11. Schottky diode device used for measurement of chemicurrents. Highly exoergic surface reactions like adsorption of an atom to the surface produce excited electrons and holes. Some of these electrons are able to surmount the Schottky barrier <f> and arrive at the semiconductor conduction band. This results in a detectable chemicurrent. (From Ref. 64.)...
The decrease in free carriers (holes) after hydrogenation of p-type Si is also evidenced by the decrease in IR absorption at the longer wavelengths, where free-carrier absorption dominates, and by a decrease in the device capacitance of Schottky-barrier diodes, due to the increase in the depletion width (at a given reverse bias) as the effective acceptor concentration decreases. [Pg.20]

The ability to make ever smaller solid-state devices by improved lithography techniques has led to the development of so-called beam lead Schottky-barrier diode detectors and mixers in which diodes are fabricated by the same techniques used to make integrated circuits, and for this reason, they can be included in these circuits. Figure 7 shows such a beam-lead detector/mixer made by Virginia Diodes of Charlottesville, VA [15]. This same configuration is used in fabricating the varactor devices used for frequency multiplication discussed in the preceding section. [Pg.252]

The promise of photoelectrochemical devices of both the photovoltaic and chemical producing variety has been discussed and reviewed extensively.Cl,, 3,4) The criteria that these cells must meet with respect to stability, band gap and flatband potential have been modeled effectively and in a systematic fashion. However, it is becomirg clear that though such models accurately describe the general features of the device, as in the case of solid state Schottky barrier solar cells, the detailed nature of the interfacial properties can play an overriding role in determining the device properties. Some of these interface properties and processes and their potential deleterious or beneficial effects on electrode performance will be discussed. [Pg.79]

In many PEC systems the chemical kinetics for the primary charge transfer process at the interface are not observed at the light intensities of interest for practical devices and the interface can be modeled as a Schottky barrier. This is true because the inherent overpotential, the energy difference between where minority carriers are trapped at the band edge and the location of the appropriate redox potential in the electrolyte, drives the reaction of interest. The Schottky barrier assumption breaks down near zero bias where the effects of interface states or surface recombination become more important.(13)... [Pg.87]


See other pages where Schottky Barrier Devices is mentioned: [Pg.7]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.1586]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.1613]    [Pg.387]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.437 ]




SEARCH



Schottky barrier

Schottky devices

© 2024 chempedia.info