Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Models effects

The physical models described in Chapter 2 generate a variety of incident outcomes that arc caused by release of hazardous material or energy. Dispersion models (Section 2.3) estimate concentrations and/or doses of dispersed vapor vapor cloud explosions (VCE) (Section 3.1), physical c q)losion models (Section 3.3), fireball models (Section 3.4), and confined explosion models (Section 3.5) estimate shock wave overpressures and fragment velocities. Pool fire models (Section 3.6), jet fire models (Section 3.7), BLEVE models (Section 3.4) and flash fire models (Section 3.2) predict radiant flux. These models rely on the general principle that severity of outcome is a function of distance from the source of release. [Pg.235]

The next step in CPQRA is to assess the consequences of these incident outcomes. The consequence is dependent on the object of the study. For the purpose of assessing effects on human beings, consequences may be expressed as deaths or injuries. If physical property, such as structures and buildings, is the object, the consequences may be monetary losses. Environmental effects may be much more complex, and could include impacts on plant or animal life, soil contamination, damage to natural resources, and other impacts. Modeling of environmental impacts is beyond the scope of this book. [Pg.235]

Many CPQRA studies consider several types of incident outcomes simultaneously (e.g., property damage and exposures to flammable and/or toxic substances). To estimate risk, a common unit of consequence measure must be used for each type of effect (e.g., death, injury, or monetary loss). The difficulty in comparing different injury types has led to the use of fatalities as the dominant criterion for thermal radiation, blast overpressure, and toxicity eiqxisurcs. [Pg.235]

One method of assessing the consequence of an incident outcome is the direct effect model, which predicts effects on people or structures based on prede- [Pg.235]


We restrict ourselves again to symmetric tetraatomic molecules (ABBA) with linear eqnilibrium geometi7. After integrating over electronic spatial and spin coordinates we obtain for A elecbonic states in the lowest order (quartic) approximation the effective model Hamiltonian H — Hq+ H, which zeroth-order part is given by Eq. (A.4) and the perturbative part of it of the form... [Pg.539]

Like frequency estimates, consequence estimates can have very large uncertainties. Estimates that vary by orders of magnitude can result from (1) basic uncertainties in chemical/physical properties, (2) differences in average vs. time-dependent meteorological conditions, and/or (3) uncertainties in the release, dispersion, and effects models. Some... [Pg.34]

The biological effects models should be updated and improved in the light of new information. [Pg.4]

NUCRAC improves on the health effects model by a reexamination of Hiroshima and Nagasaki data. The dry deposition model was much improved by the inclusion of a particle-si/e distribution, a detailed settling model, and a detailed chronic exposure model via the food pathway. However, it does not include a rainout model. [Pg.330]

Effect models describe the impact of the physical effects of a fire, e.xplosion, or toxic gas release on exposed people, the environment or property, based on the results of tlie source, dispersion, and fire and explosion models. [Pg.516]

Source terms for dispersion and other models Uncertainties in effects modeling -Animal data inappropriate for humans (especially for toxicity) Mitigating effects may be omitted... [Pg.524]

Cause-consequence analysis serx es to characterize tlie physical effects resulting from a specific incident and the impact of these physical effects on people, the environment, and property. Some consequence models or equations used to estimate tlie potential for damage or injury are as follows Source Models, Dispersion Models, Fire Explosion Models, and Effect Models. Likelihood estimation (frequency estimation), cliaractcrizcs the probability of occurrence for each potential incident considered in tlie analysis. The major tools used for likelihood estimation are as follows Historical Data, Failure sequence modeling techniques, and Expert Judgment. [Pg.535]

A cost-effective model concentrates on the smallest elements at areas of highest stress. This configuration provides greater detail in areas of major stress and distortion, and minimizes computer time in analyzing regions of the component where stresses and local distortions are smaller. [Pg.128]

Penpenultiraale and higher order remote unit effect models may also affect the outcome of copolymerizations. However, in most eases, experimental data, that are not sufficiently powerful to test the penultimate model, offer little hope of testing higher order models. The importance of remote unit effects on copolymerization will only be fully resolved when more powerful analytical techniques become available. [Pg.344]

Although in the above work the rate spread for detritiation was greater than for dedeuteration, surprisingly, in the reaction of lithium cyclohexylamide at 25 °C with fluorobenzenes and benzotrifluorides, the relative rates for dedeuteration and detritiation were595, respectively 2-F, 6.3 xlO5 and 3.4 x10s 3-F, 107 and 86 4-F, 11.2 and 9.1 3-CF3, 580 and 390, which therefore shows the reverse. The rate enhancement for these substituents were found to correlate reasonably with a field effect model for the inductive effect. [Pg.274]

Termination scheme 11 applies to the geometric mean and phi factor models and scheme 12 Is required for the penultimate effect model. All the above reaction models were used In attempts to simulate kinetic data. [Pg.16]

Solvolytic experiments specifically designed to test Bartell s theory were carried out by Karabatsos et al. (1967), who were primarily interested in an assessment of the relative contributions of hyperconjugation and non-bonded interactions to secondary kinetic isotope effects. Model calculations of the (steric) isotope effect in the reaction 2- 3 were performed, as well as that in the solvolyses of acetyl chloride... [Pg.16]

Legislation enacted by both Canada and the United States (see the US-Canada Air Quality Accord, 1991) will, when implemented, reduce the North American emissions of sulphur dioxide by about 50% based upon the 1980 baseline. These projected emission fields have been appplied in the atmospheric source-receptor models that were described above, to provide a projected deposition field for acidic sulphate that would be expected (14). The predicted sulphate deposition fields have then subsequently been appUed in aquatic effects models that provide estimates of regional surface water acidification distributions (50). The regional acidification profiles have then been used in a model of fish species richness (51) that results in an estimate of the expected presence of fish species as compared to that expected in an unacidified case. [Pg.58]

The greater than unit value of Kf in pure solvents is the result expected by the field effect model (33) on a distance basis. The lower than unit value ofKj in the mixed aqueous organic solvents appears to be related to preferential hydration of the reaction center, which results in an increased effective dielectric constant from the m- compared to the p- position. The fact that values fall into two separate categories for pure organic and mixed aqueous organic solvents does not support the treatments of Exner (20) or Yukawa and Tsuno (16). [Pg.59]

Because physicochemical cause-and-effect models are the basis of all measurements, statistics are used to optimize, validate, and calibrate the analytical method, and then interpolate the obtained measurements the models tend to be very simple (i.e., linear) in the concentration interval used. [Pg.10]

The model is fit effects, specific effects, model coefficients, and residuals are displayed. [Pg.371]

L. B. Kier, Surface Effects Modeled with Cellular Automata, impublished. [Pg.108]

Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Approximations to the loglikelihood function in the nonlinear mixed effects model. / Comput Graphical Stat, 1995 4 12-35. [Pg.102]

Lindstrom MJ, Bates DM. Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics, 1990 46 673-87. [Pg.102]

Enantio-diflerentiation over heterogeneous catalysts. The shielding effect model. [Pg.241]

Two kinetic experiments with different CD concentrations were used for kinetic modeling. In this simulation all of the rate constants not involved in the hydrogenation step were not altered. The calculated and simulated kinetic curves and optical yield-conversion dependencies are shown in Figure 9a and 9b. The results of kinetic modeling indicates that the whole kinetic curve and the optical yield - conversion dependencies can be well described by a kinetic model derived from the shielding effect model. [Pg.249]

It is the purpose of this section to review ways in which processes involving electrons are either explicitly accounted for in calculations on polymeric systems or in which a more or less rigorous abstraction from the electronic degrees of freedom into effective models of a coarser-grained nature is performed. The next level up from electrons is obviously atoms. Hence, this section deals mainly with the connection between quantum chemistry and atomistic (force field) simulations. Calculations which exclusively use quantum chemistry are not covered. This excludes, for example, all of the recent work on metallocene catalysis. [Pg.52]

Antonenko et al. [540] considered pH gradients forming in the UWL under bulk solution iso-pH conditions. They elegantly expanded on the buffer effect model and made it more general by considering multicomponent buffer mixtures. Direct measurements of the pH gradients (using wire-coated micro-pH electrodes) near the membrane-water interface were described. [Pg.231]


See other pages where Models effects is mentioned: [Pg.10]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.918]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.1194]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.109 , Pg.110 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.235 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info