Sample preparation methods direct analysis

Soper, S.A., Ford, S.M., Xu, Y.C., Qi, S.Z., McWhorter, S., Lassiter, S., Patterson, D., Bmch, R.C., Nanoliter-scale sample preparation methods directly coupled to polymethylmethacrylate-based microchips and gel-filled capillaries for the analysis of oligonucleotides.. /. Chromatogr. A 1999, 853, 107-120. 

Direct injection of plasma or supernatant after protein precipitation on a short column with a high liquid flow rate is a common method for reducing analysis time in the pharmaceutical industry. The direct injection of a sample matrix is also known as the dilute-and-shoot (DAS) approach.62 DAS can be applied to all types of matrices and approaches and is the simplest sample preparation method with matrix dependency. Direct injection can also be approached through the extraction of eluent from PPT, SPE, and LLE onto a normal phase analytical column. The procedure is called hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)70110111 and it avoids the evaporation and reconstitution steps that may cause loss of samples from heat degradation and absorption. 

The compound to be analysed, the analyte, is generally contained in a liquid or solid matrix it is rarely found in a form that allows direct measurement. Interfering species that may lead to unwanted interactions, particularly during trace analysis in the presence of abundant matrix components, have to be eliminated. As a result, analysts have long acknowledged the need for efficient and reproducible sample preparation methods. The pre-treatment process has to take into account the analyte, matrix and measurement technique chosen. This situation has led to a number of specific sample pre-treatment protocols that describe sample treatment from sampling all the way to recording of the results (Fig. 20.1). 

Jensen, O. N. 1999. Sample preparation methods for mass spectrometric peptide mapping directly from 2-DE gels. In 2-D Proteome Analysis Protocols, Link, A. I, ed., Humana Press (Totowa, New Jersey), 513-530. 

All of these techniques can, of course, be used simultaneously with chromatographic separation techniques. Methods that allow an improvement in the mass spectrometer specificity can thus be worthwhile alternatives to long procedures for sample preparation. However, quantitative analysis carried out directly on neat samples may undergo a matrix effect characterized by a variation in the sample response because of the effect of the matrix on the abundance of ions within the source. 

Another example of ultrasound use is leaching of organic impurities from different kinds of samples. The main analytes of interest are PAHs, which are widespread in soil, sediment, dust, and particulate samples [55]. USE is recommended as a fast, efficient, and direct environmental sample preparation method for determination of PCBs, nitrophenols, pesticides, or polymer additives. Organometallic and biologically active compounds (such as vitamins A, D, and E) present in samples in trace quantities, can be extracted from animal and plant tissues with the aid of ultrasonic wave energy [59]. Table 6.6 presents some typical applications of USE in trace analysis of biological and environmental samples [60]. 

Spinning chromatography sample preparation method 3.5.1 Direct Analysis of Organic Solutions... 

The application of atomic spectroscopy methods to the analysis of petroleum products is important to the oil industry. All oil samples must be prepared in solution form and be at a concentration so as to be detected to quantify all metals of interest with accuracy and precision. Solutions containing petroleum products in organic solvents may be measured directly or with the use of internal standards to correct for viscosity effects. It is important that the selected solvent dissolves the oil and products and does not cause erratic flickering of the plasma, or quenches it. It is also important that the same solvent can be used to prepare calibration standards. The following methods are common sample preparation methods for metal analysis of crude and lubricating oils. 

TLC is an ideal sample preparation method prior to further analysis for substance identification. Using suitable TLC systems, especially those involving optimal precoated layers, it is possible not only to separate mixtures of unknown substances but also to use various spectroscopic evaluation methods directly on the layers. By this combination of two different analytical methods, it is often possible to perform an imequivo-cal identification of a substance even when the samples are extremely small. These spectroscopic evaluation methods include the following ... 

The sample preparation method must not only deliver a measurable amount of sample but the compounds accompanying the analyte must not interfere with the analysis. As an illustration, consider a gravimetric assay in which the detection step has no discriminating power and the sample preparation provides all of the specificity. In contrast, an enzyme assay can be performed on a very complex sample without any sample preparation or isolation of the analyte, because the changes in substrate concentration can be linked directly to the activity of the enzyme. 

The preferred sample preparation method for residual solvent analysis of pharmaceuticals is direct injection of the dissolved sample (11,60). With this technique, the recovery is most reliable because there is no opportunity for recovery loss due to adsorption or entrapment. The other techniques involve a separation of the volatiles before the GC injection and there is a risk that the volatile will be trapped. Typical solvents for this analysis are water, dimethyl sulfoxide, benzyl alcohol, and dimethylformamide (11,12,61). The three latter solvents are chosen because they are higher-boiling than commonly used pharmaceutical solvents and thus elute after them and do not interfere with the analysis. Water offers the advantage that it contributes little interference with a flame ionization detector. 

For laboratory measurements, samples were measured directly with minimal sample preparation. Prior to analysis, the samples were prepared by placing 4 mL of liquid sample into a Chemplex XRF disposable plastic liquid sample cell fitted with a Chemplex cardboard-moimted mylar window (3.6-pm thickness). The analytical volume of the MWDXRF method is small due to the focusing nature of the incoming X-ray beam. The full size of the excitation beam is about 1 mm x 1 mm on the Mylar window and the sulfur X-rays 1/e escape depth for fuel is 0.1 mm. Therefore, only a small amoimt of the specimen near the center of the film is analyzed during measurement. The sample cell was vented immediately after sample preparation if gasoline or another volatile sample was used. The Mylar film surface was kept dust free, flat, and wrinkle free near the center area of the sample cell to avoid errors during measurement. 

In water, GC-MS is coupled to purge and trap or headspace sample preparation for the analysis of VOCs like BTEX and MTBE. Another important group of volatile analytes in water are DBFs. Attention has been directed to volatile chlorinated compounds such as trihalomethanes (THMs), as well as other semivolatile compounds such as haloacetic acids (HAAs), haloacetonitriles, haloketones, and ha-loaldehydes. The methods used to determine these compounds include GC-EI-LRMS, where a after derivatization step is necessary due to the low volatility and high polarity of these analytes. Using this technique, limits of detection were in the microgram per liter range. 

Sample preparation is usually performed prior to the chromatographic analysis, but it is often coupled directly to it in the form of an intermediate first step (automated in-line sample preparation). Sample preparation aims to avoid overloading effects by appropriately diluting the sample, removing interfering matrix constituents, and/or making ions that are present in very low concentrations accessible to analysis via preconcentration. Thus, sample preparation methods are multifaceted and, depending on the required sample preparation steps, associated with a widely different instrumental setup and time expenditure. 

Although as described above fliese alloy systems have been studied by a number of research groups, it is difficult to directly compare one system to another because of differences between sample preparation methods and experimental techniques. Such multielement comparisons do not appear routinely in the literature because flic amount of work involved in sample preparation and testing using traditional one at a time mefliods is prohibitive. Thus, a paper published by Stevens et al. [235] demonstrated flic usefijlness of composition spread preparation and analysis techniques for fuel ceU catalyst research. Furthermore, performance measurements of Pti composition were used to identify more complex ternary or quaternary composition for future studies. 

Mass spectrometry using alternative ionization and sample preparation methods are employed in ink and paint analysis. The oldest of these techniques is based on pjnrolysis of the sample (typically, a paint) prior to its introduction into the GC. Detectors for PyGC are and FID. Pyrolysis patterns can be examined in the same way accelerant patterns are (Chapter 10), but increasingly, GCMS is preferred over FID. Pyrolysis is, by definition, destructive, but the sample size is reasonably small, and recently a micropyrolysis GCMS has been developed and applied to photocopier toners and paint. A laser is focused on the sample through a microscope, and the pyrolysis vapor product is directed into the GCMS system. The pattern of the pyrolyzates and chemical composition... 

The first question in analysis is how to introduce a sample into a GC. If the flavoring is present in a simple solvent system, e.g., alcohol, triethyl citrate, triacetin, or propylene glycol, it can be directly injected into a GC. However, if the flavoring contains nonvolatile components (e.g., vegetable oil solvent, fhiit solids, or emulsifiers), this is not possible and some sample preparation method must be initially applied to the sample before GC analysis. Unfortunately, the sample preparation method will bias the analytical profile (perhaps even miss some compounds) and greatly complicate any quantitative efforts (refer to Chapter 3). Sample preparation... 

---