Healthcare settings

Simons PER, et al WAO survey on global availabil- 28 ity of medications, supplies and equipment for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis by physicians in healthcare settings (in preparation). 

In healthcare settings, the risk of harmful effects is higher with intravenous epinephrine than with epinephrine administered through other routes of injection [2, 6]. Dosing errors have been attributed to the common practice of using ratios such as 1 10,000 to express the epinephrine concentrations therefore, use of mass concentration such as 0.1 mg in 1 ml is recommended [23]. 

Koopmans, M. (2009). Noroviruses in healthcare settings A challenging problem. J. FIosp. Infect. 73, 331-337. 

Evaluation requires careful clinical, biochemical, and, if necessary, psychological evaluation. Progress should be assessed in a healthcare setting once or twice monthly for the first 1 to 2 months, then monthly. Each encounter... 

Use of the medical grade gas is by prescription only, and regulated by the FDA. Compressed medical gas suppliers must register with FDA, and are subjected to facility inspections from FDA at least once every two years. Licenses required to purchase and administer nitrous oxide in the healthcare setting is regulated on a state level. 

Gulinello, J. J. (1998). Emergency and disaster preparedness in the healthcare setting Elements of a viable response. Journal of Healthcare Protection Management, J5(l), 72. 

In Africa, reuse of contaminated needles and syringes and lack of appropriate barrier precautions to prevent exposure to blood and other body fluids (including vomitus, urine, and stool) have been responsible for transmission in healthcare settings (54). Most patients with VHP infections have significant viremia, and with the exception of dengue and classic Hanta viral infection, many have significant quantities of the virus in other secretions. Because most cases have been associated with exposures to multiple body fluids, the risk for any specific contact is not clear (54). 

The following sections of this chapter will describe the technology available for POCT and the organizational factors that are important when POCT is implemented in a healthcare setting. The chapter concludes with a short discussion of the future of POCT. 

Fields serve to ensure that Collaborative Review Groups consider healthcare issues other than interventions, e.g., healthcare settings, types of consumers, and types of providers. For example, the field devoted to the healthcare of elderly people does the following 1) assist in the handsearching activity of specialist journals, 2) ensure... 

This article describes how to find and understand the evidence, and how to apply it in the healthcare setting. 

Boisset, M. Fitzcharles, M.A. Alternative medicine yse by rheumatology patients in a universal healthcare setting. J. Rheumatol. 1994, 21 (1), 148-152. 

Carroll NV. Formularies and therapeutic interchange healthcare setting makes a difference. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1999 56 467-72. 

The Divisions and Committees, which report to the Federal Council, develop and implement policy in the areas central to SHPA s goals. They include the Publications Division Research, Grants and Development Committee Division of Specialty Practice Liaison and Promotion Unit, and the Division of Education. Each is responsible for advising the Federal Executive of new developments and opportunities that will allow SHPA to continue its mission of promoting and developing the practice of pharmacy in hospitals and other healthcare settings. 

Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in healthcare settings. Morb. 

Clearly two distinct issues arise from these observations. The first is whether the development of nonsusceptibility to antiseptics by nosocomial pathogens, skin flora, and other microorganisms results in decreased clinical efficacy of the topical antiseptics used in healthcare settings. The second issue is whether the emergence of resistance to the antiseptics will result in cross-resistance to clinically useful antibiotics. The concern in the latter case is that the wide availability and use of antiseptics and the selection pressure they provide will counterselect for antibiotic resistant pathogens. 

EL Larson. American Practitioners of Infection Control guidelines for infection control practices APIC guideline for handwashing and hand antiseptics in healthcare settings. Am J Infect Control 23 251-269, 1995. 

The distinguishing characteristics of a healthcare personnel handwash/anti-septic focus on its intended use as a fast-acting, broad-spectrum antimicrobial antiseptic designed for rapid removal and/or kill of transient skin microorganisms encountered in a healthcare setting. These products are designed for very frequent use, up to 50-100 times per workday. A persistent antimicrobial effect is a desirable characteristic but is not necessary since these products are used frequently throughout the day. 

The host is exposed to the microorganism in a variety of situations relevant to topical antimicrobial compounds. The scenarios tending to infection described below relate to the healthcare setting, but much the same sets of conditions are involved in transmission of foodborne disease via the environmentally or fecally contaminated hands of food handlers. Generally, there is (1) the exposure of patients to pathogenic microorganisms via a healthcare worker s contamination by a different patient, worker, or environmental source (2) the exposure of a patient s surgical site or a worker s wound site to contaminated hands and... 

The Healthcare Personnel Handwash Test (HCPHWT) was originally proposed to evaluate products specifically intended for use in healthcare settings [1] and has become the standard evaluation tool for consumer antimicrobial products. Consumers have many distinct and unique habits and practices that differ from those found in the healthcare setting. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss variables that can affect the performance of the test and its utility for evaluating handwashing products used by consumers. 

The HCPHWT has been the traditional evaluation tool for antibacterial soap products in the United States. This is a controlled, clinical method with a historical database. Although it was intended to model in the healthcare setting, it has been used as the basis to support marketed claims for antibacterial soap products for both consumer and professional use. The above discussions demonstrate that the HCPHWT method does not provide control for many of the variables that can influence the performance of test products ( especially consumer products). Consequently, use of this test may not adequately evaluate the efficacy of products intended for use by consumers. A need exists for additional test methods specifically designed to evaluate consumer products while modeling real-world conditions. 

More research needs to be performed to better understand consumers typical intervention points after contact with the environment. Unlike the healthcare setting, in which healthcare workers contact contaminated sources such as a patients and should wash their hands, consumers generally wash their hands only when they perceive them as being dirty. Consumers need to be better educated about how they can contact bacteria and when they should wash their hands. Many consumers may not wash their hands frequently enough to significantly reduce risk of bacterial transfer or infection. Increased use of antimicrobial products with persistent activity could reduce risk of contamination especially in situations where frequent handwashing is not practical or the use of alternative forms such as hand sanitizers allow for washing away from sinks. 

These systems are associated with the running and operation of the healthcare service. Often the applications are not specific to health and sometimes they are general tools which have been configured for use in a healthcare setting. Typical systems are those which support business functions such as ... 

---