Safety considerations approach

Because of the complexity of designs and performance characteristics, it is difficult to select the optimum atomizer for a given appHcation. The best approach is to consult and work with atomizer manufacturers. Their technical staffs are familiar with diverse appHcations and can provide valuable assistance. However, they will usually require the foUowing information properties of the Hquid to be atomized, eg, density, viscosity, and surface tension operating conditions, such as flow rate, pressure, and temperature range required mean droplet size and size distribution desired spray pattern spray angle requirement ambient environment flow field velocity requirements dimensional restrictions flow rate tolerance material to be used for atomizer constmction cost and safety considerations. 

In risk characterization, step four, the human exposure situation is compared to the toxicity data from animal studies, and often a safety -margin approach is utilized. The safety margin is based on a knowledge of uncertainties and individual variation in sensitivity of animals and humans to the effects of chemical compounds. Usually one assumes that humans are more sensitive than experimental animals to the effects of chemicals. For this reason, a safety margin is often used. This margin contains two factors, differences in biotransformation within a species (human), usually 10, and differences in the sensitivity between species (e.g., rat vs. human), usually also 10. The safety factor which takes into consideration interindividual differences within the human population predominately indicates differences in biotransformation, but sensitivity to effects of chemicals is also taken into consideration (e.g., safety faaor of 4 for biotransformation and 2.5 for sensitivity 4 x 2.5 = 10). For example, if the lowest dose that does not cause any toxicity to rodents, rats, or mice, i.e., the no-ob-servable-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) is 100 mg/kg, this dose is divided by the safety factor of 100. The safe dose level for humans would be then 1 mg/kg. Occasionally, a NOAEL is not found, and one has to use the lowest-observable-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) in safety assessment. In this situation, often an additional un-... 

The success of a laboratory design depends on many factors, not the least of which are health and safety considerations. When the team approach is implemented, each member brings to the design specific expertise essential to the element of proper design. 

Generally offshore facilities and major process plants onshore represent considerable capital investment and have a high number of severe hazards associated with them (blowouts, ship collisions, line and vessel ruptures, etc.). They normally cannot be easily evaluated with a simple safety checklist approach. Some level of "quantifiable evaluation" reviews are usually prepared to demonstrate that the risk of these facilities is within public, national, industry and corporate expectations. 

Safety Considerations. Some of these factors can be controlled with appropriate precautions or equipment, but others may lead you to select a different approach to the analysis ... 

The major advantage of (fractional) oral clearance as a phenotypic trait is that its value is linearly related to the enzyme s catalytic activity, provided that first-order conditions are present. This requirement, along with any safety considerations, is the main reason the dose of an in vivo probe should be as low as possible, consistent with analytical considerations. Furthermore, it is possible to directly extrapolate this type of trait measure to the disposition of other drugs whose metabolism is mediated by the measured enzyme and also to place the trait value within a therapeutic context. On the other hand, estimation of oral clearance requires multiple blood and urine collections, often over many hours, that are an inconvenience for the study subject and require considerable amounts of analytical time and effort. Because of this, simpler and less time-consuming approaches have often been used. However, it is not always appreciated that such phenotyping tests provide only an indirect measure of metabolizing activity and may be affected by factors other than the enzyme s intrinsic clearance. In addition, it is difficult to relate an indirect trait measure to parameters that are of clinical importance, such as the drug s clearance. 

An upper limit of 180°F should not be exceeded in the tank. This temperature is the practical stability limit. The practical stability limit represent a temperature above which it is undesirable to operate because of unwanted side reactions, safety considerations, or damage to equipment. Consequently, we see if we started at an initial temperature of 160°F and an initial concentration of 0.14mol/dm, the practical stability limit of 180°F would be exceeded as the reactor approached its steady-state temperature of 138°F. See concentration-temperature trajectory in Figure E9-4.4. 

The next question to be addressed was that of the mathematical model to be used for the extrapolation. Most particularly, would one model do for all effects or was more than one required This is obviously particularly a problem with cancer. Various models have been proposed for cancer, but there has been little consideration of the use of dose/response extrapolation for effects other than cancer the safety factor approach is assumed adequate. For reasons given above, the Committee did not agree. 

Not all the performance goals listed above are equally important in every measurement some of the goals are even contradictory, so that compromises are necessary. Design simplicity and safety considerations require that compressed gases should be avoided. A modular approach, such as the following, makes it possible to meet most of the goals simultaneously. 

Concurrent travel is possible whenever the lift motor (vertical motor) is separate from the travel motor (horizontal motor). While concurrent travel is often limited when the forks are raised (due to safety considerations), most trucks follow a combination of concurrent and sequential travel while operating. A conservative approach would be to assume 100% sequential travel that is, the truck first moves horizontally down the aisle, once it stops, then the forks are laised (for vertical travel). 

Department of Defense policy is to rely on performance based requirements whenever practicable and to not require standard management approaches or manufacturing processes in solicitations and contracts. By establishing performance requirements and then relying on contractors to meet those requirements, we dramatically reduce contractual call-out of specific specifications and standards and enable innovation. Most importantly, this allows contractors to meet our full needs—including safety considerations—at the lowest cost. 

The distinction between the generic model and others becomes, then, the inclusion of personnel, procedures, environment, and task considerations, not the complexity of the hardware. Whereas product safety may include only hardware, system safety includes hardware, personnel, procedures, environment, and task considerations, and a safety system approach is appropriate as a method of achieving product safety regardless of the complexity of the hardware. The approach to system safety outlined in the following chapters is also a state-of-the-art method of achieving product safety. 

Hydrojetting of substructures can be done manually by an operator holding a high pressure hose, or by a unit mounted on a robot arm as shown in Figure 5.3. Manual jetting requires a very high level of protection for the operator and for bystanders. Safety considerations make this approach rare in the USA. 

Safety considerations of such new approaches and in particular the investigation of severe accident conditions are important. An investigation of a severe reactivity accident in an accelerator-driven fast reactor was earlier undertaken. 

---