Safety assessment definition

Criterion 10. Safety assessment Definition of events outside of established safety envelope should include DBTs (and) include a QA provision for safety assessments and extended to include operational phase (not just design phase) to cover the changes in design. 

This section is devoted to the definition and comparison of the three nonrodent animal models (dog, ferret, and monkey) in terms of experimental procedures, environmental and dietary requirements, as well as advantages and disadvantages of use in safety assessment testing. 

All fraud is also misconduct by definition, but misconduct per se is not so clear-cut. It could be accidental, for example missing the due date for patient assessments, or carelessly completing case record forms, but the point where carelessness becomes misconduct and misconduct becomes fraud is indistinct. A safety assessment might be omitted because the research team forgot... 

The probability and route of exposure of humans to a chemical are crucial parameters in risk assessment. By definition, in an extreme case where the probability of exposure is null, the risk is null. Thus, there is a considerable difference in the regulatory requirements for safety assessment of industrial chemicals and environmental contaminants that result in accidental exposures compared to chemicals designed for intentional exposure of the population, like cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. Each one of these categories is subjected to specific European laws. 

The tiiermal behaviour of a chemical reactor depends on the thermodynamics of the process, on the reaction rate, vtdiich has already been mentioned above, but also on the mode of exchange with the environment. This is completely described in the overall heat balance of the system. The following sections will present the main balance equations, which are required for the subsequent safety assessment, as well as definitions and interpretation of characteristic numbers used in their presentatioiL... 

To usefully apply CRM to the safety assessment of HIT systems we need to begin with the concept of the hazard. The term hazard is derived from an Arabic word which was adopted to mean an unlucky roll of the dice. There are many modem definitions of hazard some of them helpful to CRM and others less so. What is common to most definitions is the notion of harm. Depending on the context harm might... 

With due notice of the GSN challenges referred to in Section 2.5, Fig. 2.4 is intended to provide a starting point for anyone trying to compile a GSN argument for a CS25.1309 compliant System Safety Assessment. This argument is by no means definitive and appropriate in all circumstances, but should provide a stimulus for debate. 

The general approach was to tailor MIL-STD-882B requirements to provide a simple, usable, effective approach to facility system safety. Basic definitions, tasks, risk assessment methods, and hazard ansilyses were straight from the standard. 

Once a compound is selected for development, further studies are performed in animals and man to support the safety assessment and ensure that optimum dosing regimens are selected. Definitive in vivo PK and toxicokinetic studies are performed but also more detailed in vitro studies, particularly for the assessment of drug-drug interactions. ADME/PK support is continued throughout development (pre-clinical and phases I-IV) and a summary list of the main activities is shown in Table 4. 

There exist various methods for inspecting superstructures as bridges and buildings. So far, visual inspection is most extensively employed. Since defects, deterioration, and damage normally grow inside structure, a safety assessment cannot be based solely on the visual observation of cracks and signs of damages in structural elements. The technique should enable to provide definitive and quantitative evaluation in a short time. In... 

Obviously, definitive proof of die correctness of any theory or model can never be achieved. Simultaneous accqitance of an absolute definition for validation and an absolute requirement for validated models accordingly dooms any modelling tqiproach to fiulure from the outset. More useful is a pragmatic approach to validation which recognises that models and databases are sufficiently validated for use in a safety assessment when they are good enough to ensure that any remaining inaccuracies will not lead to an erroneous prediction of apparendy accqitable r ository performance in cases where actual performance would be inadequate. 

Adapted from Federal Aviation Administration, Chapters—Principles of System Safety , 2000, and Chapter 4—Safety Assessments Before Investment Decision , 2000 (Principles of System Safety, 2000, chap. 3, Safety assessments before Investment decision, 2000, chap. 6). Adapted from Roughton and Crutchfield, 2008 (Roughton Crutchfield, 2008) Acquisition Risk Management Probability Definitions, n.d. 

It may be that the safety requirements specification has already been developed for a similar system or for another safety assessment on this system. In these cases the assessor should carefully check to ensure that the current application matches the application for which a safety requirements specification already exists. If there is a close correspondence then the existing analysis may be used. Where there are differences, a new (full or partial) re-definition of the safety requirements specification will be necessary. 

A. definite specification was not obtainable for the system being considered but, as this study is only a limited safety assessment for demonstration purposes and information was available to enable the subsequent steps to be completed, the study was continued. 

A more policy-oriented issue is that many applications do not follow the suggested definitions by relevant authorities. In the Formal Safety Assessment (FSA), which is commonly seen as the official guide for risk assessment in the maritime field, risk is defined as the combination of the frequency and the severity of the consequence (IMO 2007), i.e. a categorization in line with class C6. While the definitions based on expected values (Cl) are close to this view as it consists of the same elements, the definitions in line with C2 and especially C5 represent significantly different risk classes. The ISO-def-inition, seeing risk as the effect of uncertainty on objectives , is not applied in the application area. 

In the field of maritime transportation, risk assessment is overall very strongly tied to probabilities, both in relation to the adopted definition as in the applied risk description. This may be at least in part due to the definition in the Formal Safety Assessment (FSA), as the combination of the frequency and the severity of the consequence (IMO 2007). 

The definition of the fragility curve for containment of a Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) generally represents a crucial step for the level 2 probabilistic safety assessment (PSA L2), where the probability of containment failure can be evaluated as the convolution of the fragility curve with the load curve (SSG-4). The assessment of the structural strength of the containment of a nuclear power plant has acquired even a greater importance in the framework of post-Fukushima stress tests where the assessment of the safety margin and off-design conditions. 

---