Risk to human health

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) was enacted in 1976 to identify and control toxic chemical ha2ards to human health and the environment. One of the main provisions of TSCA was to estabUsh and maintain an inventory of all chemicals in commerce in the United States for the purpose of regulating any of the chemicals that might pose an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment. An initial inventory of chemicals was estabhshed by requiring companies to report to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) all substances that were imported, manufactured, processed, distributed, or disposed of in the United States. Over 50,000 chemical substances were reported. PoUowing this initial inventory, introduction of all new chemical substances requires a Premanufacturing Notification (PMN) process. To be included in the PMN are the identity of the new chemical, the estimated first year and maximum production volume, manufacture and process information, a description of proposed use, potential release to the environment, possible human exposure to the new substance, and any health or environmental test data available at the time of submission. In the 10 years that TSCA has been in effect, the USEPA has received over 10,000 PMNs and up to 10% of the submissions each year are for dyes (382)... 

The degree of risk to human health and the environment posed by such constituents. 

Provides information on how levels of exposure of hazardous chemicals affect human health. Covers levels of exposure to hazardous chemicals below which no adverse health effects are expected to occur in various segments of the human population. The reference dose and carcinogenicity assessments on IRIS can sen>e as guides in e >aluating potential health hazards and selecting response to alleviate a potential risk to human health. Hours 8 00 a.m. to 4 40 p.m. EST, Monday - Friday. 

The outcome of the process will result in the inclusion of the substance in one of four Annexes to the regulation. If the conclusion is that safe M RLs can be established, then final MRLs for the substance are added to Annex I. A substance will be inserted in Annex II if it is concluded that residues cannot cause a risk to human health. If some uncertainty remains over the proposed MRLs, then these can be included in Annex III as provisional MRLs for a maximum period of 5 years. Finally, if it is concluded that no safe residue limits can be set, the substance is placed in Annex IV, which means that it cannot be used in medicines for treatment of food-producing animals (Table 7.3). 

Risks to human health and the environment will vary considerably depending upon the type and extent of exposure. Responsible authorities are strongly encouraged to characterize risk on the basis of locally measured or predicted exposure scenarios. To assist the reader, examples of exposure estimation and risk characterization are provided in CICADs, whenever possible. These examples cannot be considered as representing all... 

An enzyme immunoassay technique has been employed for measuring endosulfan and its degradation products (i.e., endosulfan diol, endosulfan sulfate, endosulfan ether, and endosulfan lactone) in water at 3 ppb (Chau and Terry 1972 Musial et al. 1976). However, this technique is not currently in use in environmental residue analysis. Further research into this technique could produce a rapid, rehable, and sensitive method for identifying contaminated areas posing a risk to human health. No additional methods for detecting endosulfan in environmental media appear to be necessary at this time. However, methods for the determination of endosulfan degradation products are needed. 

B) A determination of whether adequate information on the health effects of each substance is available or in the process of development to determine levels of exposure that present a significant risk to human health of acute, subacute, and chronic health effects and... 

Cothem CR, Coniglio WA, Marcus WL. 1986. Estimating risk to human health. Environmental Science and Technology 20 111-116. 

PRIO is a web-based tool intended to be used to preventively reduce risks to human health and the environment from chemicals. The aim of PRIO is to facilitate in the assessment of health and environmental risks of chemicals so that people who work as environmental managers, purchasers and product developers can identify the need for risk reduction. To achieve this PRIO provides a guide for decision-making that can be used in setting risk reduction priorities. 

Because used oil mixed with hazardous wastes increases risks to human health and the environment, all handlers are encouraged to keep used oil from becoming contaminated with hazardous... 

The nonaction alternative (1) provides no control of exposure to the contaminated soil and no reduction in the risk to human health posed through the groundwater. It also allows for possible continued migration of the contaminated plume and further degradation of the groundwater. 

Although selection of the appropriate analysis techniques is often very problem specific, the basic elements of human health risk analysis are few, as presented in Figure 1. The figure shows that the aggregate risk to human health from exposure to an airborne pollutant results from two factors (1) the spread of the primary agent (and/or its... 

In this chapter the risk assessment is briefly introduced. Risk assessment is divided into four steps hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. This chapter also highlights five risk and life cycle impact assessment models (EUSES, USEtox, GLOBOX, SADA, and MAFRAM) that allows for assessment of risks to human health and the environment. In addition other 12 models were appointed. Finally, in the last section of this chapter, there is a compilation of useful data sources for risk assessment. The data source selection is essential to obtain high quality data. This source selection is divided into two parts. First, six frequently used databases for physicochemical... 

Due to this, it is necessary to assess the risk to human health and the environment due to the exposure to these chemical additives. In this chapter the impacts that a substance can cause to a certain receptor (humans and the environment) and the harms to the receptor at different exposure levels are identified in hazard identification and hazard characterization steps, respectively. Exposure assessment takes into account the amount, frequency, and duration of the exposure to the substance. Finally, risk characterization evaluates the increased risk caused by such exposure to the exposed population. 

This chapter also highlights a selected number of models that allow for assessment of risks to human health and the environment. Finally, in the last section of this chapter, there is a compilation of useful data sources for risk assessment. 

There are many models for assessing risks to human health and/or the environment. Some of them are multimedia models, which assess the exposure and risks in different environmental matrices, such as soil, air, water, and food chains with different degrees of complexity within each medium. Conversely, others are more specific with regard to a medium or a system (e.g., river or food chain). Other models assess only human health risks or environmental risks, while some assess both risks. Based on the type of scenario that is studied, an appropriate model will be chosen. 

Fu J, Zhou Q, Liu J, Liu W, Wang T, Zhang Q, Jiang G (2008) High levels of heavy metals in rice (Oryza sativa L.) from a typical e-waste recycling area in southeast China and its potential risk to human health. Chemosphere 71(7) 1269-1275. doi 10.1016/j. chemosphere.2007.11.065... 

---