Risk assessment process site-specific

The method(s), supporting validation reports, related knowledge and target specifications are critical inputs into risk assessment process. A review is performed jointly by a transfer team from both sites. There is an assessment of complexity (simple vs. complex) and prior knowledge (similar methods/API/products already transferred vs. no experience), method robustness (low vs. high concern), which can affect quality post transfer (low vs. high risk). 

EPA is naturally interested in producing risk assessments of the highest possible quality. This requires that each assessment is sensitive to site-specific conditions, while using procedures that are consistent with those of other agency-sponsored assessments. Both inconsistency in approach and lack of technical quality (such as insensitivity to local conditions) represent problems in the risk assessment process. EPA is actively engaged in several efforts to maintain quality and consistency in risk assessment, in the face of distinctly limited professional resources. 

U.S. EPA recommends that site-specific risk assessments, incorporating direct and indirect exposures, be considered during the combustion unit s permitting process. These risk assessments may be used to evaluate the unit s impact on the surrounding environment. If a site-specific risk assessment shows that additional protection should be afforded to the surrounding environment, U.S. EPA typically will use the omnibus authority to impose the necessary permit conditions. 

In the selection of a microbial system and bioremediation method, some examination of the degradation pathway is necessary. At a minimum, the final degradation products must be tested for toxicity and other regulatory demands for closure. Recent advances in the study of microbial metabolism of xenobiotics have identified potentially toxic intermediate products (Singleton, 1994). A regulatory agency sets treatment objectives for site remediation, and process analysis must determine whether bioremediation can meet these site objectives. Specific treatment objectives for some individual compounds have been established. In other cases total petroleum hydrocarbons total benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX) or total polynuclear aromatics objectives are set, while in yet others, a toxicology risk assessment must be performed. 

NCRP emphasizes, however, that waste classification does not provide a substitute for establishing requirements on treatment and disposal of specific wastes at specific sites, requirements on remediation of contaminated sites, or decisions by regulatory authorities about the acceptability of any such activities. The acceptability of particular waste management or disposal activities must be based on site-specific assessments of risks posed by well characterized wastes. Waste classification, although useful, can only inform the process of... 

Risk assessment (i.e., calculation of risk) is a complex, multi-step process, and the results usually have a significant degree of uncertainty because of limitations in data and in the models of environmental and biological systems. In addition, for purposes of generally classifying waste, risk assessment must be generic i.e., it is not intended to apply to disposition of a specific waste in a specific manner at a specific site. 

It is important to note that the LCA is a tool and cannot provide an all-encompassing assessment. One of the reasons is that industrial processes are interconnected globally, so that complete consideration of all these interdependencies is practically impossible. Also, the results of an LCA are approximations and simplifications of cumulative burdens to the environment and of resources used. Therefore, the LCA process does not directly measure actual environmental impact, predict effects, or represent causal linkages with specific effects. As a result, to meet the needs of the study users, it may be necessary to supplement the LCA with other tools or methods to provide a basis for decision making. These tools include risk assessment, site-specific environmental assessment, etc. As a part of the scoping process, it is useful to identify where and how these other tools will be used to augment the findings of the LCA [5]. 

Extrapolation methods are used for various types of risk assessment. Methods may be used in the process of deriving environmental quality objectives, in the registration of new substances, and in the process of site-specific risk assessment. Suter (1993) called these approaches prospective (the former 2) and retrospective (the latter) risk assessments. The specific process in which extrapolation methods are used has implications for the concepts to be applied and the data to be used as input in extrapolation. Strictly described approaches are in place for the derivation of environmental quality criteria (EQCs) and the registration of pesticides and newly developed substances. The prescribed approaches for deriving EQCs can differ between jurisdictions. The approaches for retrospective investigations have more degrees of freedom. A characteristic of the latter approach is that the methods can make use of measured local exposure levels and can estimate local risk with known precision (or known uncertainty ). The latter is uncommon for EQCs. 

In March 1982 the American Chemical Society sponsored a symposium on risk assessments of hazardous chemical waste sites, and the chapters of this volume are the final versions of the papers that were presented and discussed at this symposium. The first chapters present the problem the history of the development of Superfund legislation and the arguments about the most appropriate approaches to risk assessments, specific cases of hazardous waste problems in Louisiana, the problems of Love Canal and their bearing on risk assessment, and the impacts on human health that can result from hazardous waste sites. The next broad topic of the symposium was the central problem of methodology of risk assessment. The practical problems that confront the field teams who examine specific chemical waste sites are what to monitor, how to monitor, and how to have reasonable assurance of the reliability of the results of monitoring. A final chapter considers a problem of central importance to the Superfund effort how to incorporate risk assessment into the regulatory process. 

Tier 4 includes all methods that go beyond CA or RA and attempt to provide some kind of mechanistic explanation for the mixture effects, including potential interactions between the mixture components. It requires detailed information on the toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic processes involved. The diversity of models that belong to this category is huge. Examples from human mixture assessment include the application of PBPK and BRN models. In ecological risk assessment, it may involve the consideration of multiple modes of action per mixture component as well as the assumed characteristics of sets of receptor species. Therefore, tier 4 methods only apply to problems that are defined in a very specific way (regarding site, species, compounds), and where an accurate result is preferred over a conservative one. 

A risk assessment is defined as a qualitative and quantitative process conducted by EPA to characterize the nature and magnitude of risks to public health from exposure to hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants released from specific sites. Risk assessments include the following components hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. Statistical and biological models are used in quantitative risk... 

Mixtures Risk Assessment The mere occurrence of chemicals and contaminants in the environment does not increase the potential of risk to human or environment, but their exposure does. A five-step process is used to determine the extent, route, and duration of exposure and includes its environmental fate and transport. This process allows identification of likely site-specific exposure to chemicals and chemical mixtures, the extent of exposure, and the conditions under which the exposure occurred. This way contaminants of concern can be identified in a systematic manner by combining the chemical hazard and exposure data [7],... 

A site-specific risk assessment should be developed to assess and establish the necessary monitoring requirements for loading, transportation, and processing operations related to secondary waste shipments greater than 1 VSL.2 ... 

---