Reverse osmosis product water recovery

Both the brackish and seawater reverse osmosis product water costs are based on 1982 costs and they are indicative of specific plants in an assumed location in the southern United States. The cost of energy in the seawater system assumes that the reject from the first stage high pressure reverse osmosis system is sent to an energy recovery system which reduces the overall energy requirements for the total system by 31%. 

Table 3.6 Pre-treatment options for brackish water desalting plants Feed water/product water recovery Reverse osmosis (RO)...

The pressure to be used for reverse osmosis depends on the salinity of the feedwater, the type of membrane, and the desired product purity. It ranges from about 1.5 MPa for low feed concentrations or high flux membranes, through 2.5—4 MPa for brackish waters, and to 6—8.4 MPa for seawater desalination. In desalination of brackish or sea water, typical product water fluxes through spiral-wound membranes are about 600—800 kg/m /d at a recovery ratio RR of 15% and an average salt rejection of 99.5%, where... 

Dynamically formed membranes were pursued for many years for reverse osmosis because of their high water fluxes and relatively good salt rejection, especially with brackish water feeds. However, the membranes proved to be unstable and difficult to reproduce reliably and consistently. For these reasons, and because high-performance interfacial composite membranes were developed in the meantime, dynamically formed reverse osmosis membranes fell out of favor. A small application niche in high-temperature nanofiltration and ultrafiltration remains, and Rhone Poulenc continues their production. The principal application is poly(vinyl alcohol) recovery from hot wash water produced in textile dyeing operations. 

The use of ultrafiltration (UF) membranes for the separation of dissolved molecules of different size and nature has seen an increased interest in recent years. Depending on their pore size, membranes can be used in a variety of fields, such as removal of particulates from air, filtration of colloidal suspensions, treatment of product streams in the food and beverage industry, recovery of useful material from coating or dyeing baths in the automobile and textile industries and treatment of industrial waste waters (J, 2 ). UF membranes also serve as supports for ultrathin reverse osmosis (composite) membranes. 

Cross-flow filtration (CFF) also known as tangential flow filtration is not of recent origin. It began with the development of reverse osmosis (RO) more than three decades ago. Industrial RO processes include desalting of sea water and brackish water, and recovery and purification of some fermentation products. The cross-flow membrane filtration technique was next applied to the concentration and fractionation of macromolecules commonly recognized as ultrafiltration (UF) in the late 1960 s. Major UF applications include electrocoat paint recovery, enzyme and protein recovery and pyrogen removal. 

Reverse osmosis is a cross-flow membrane separation process which separates a feed stream into a product stream and a reject stream. The recovery of a reverse osmosis plant is defined as a percentage of feedwater that is recovered as product water. As all of the feedwater must be pretreated and pressurized, it is economically prudent to maximize the recovery in order to minimize power consumption and the size of the pretreatment equipment. Since most of the salts remain in the reject stream, the concentration of salts increases in that stream with increased recovery. For instance, at 50% recovery, the salt concentration in the reject is about double that of the feed and at 90% recovery, the salt concentration in the reject is nearly 10 times that of the feed. In cases of sparingly soluble salts, such as calcium sulfate, the solubility limits may be exceeded at a high recovery. This could result in precipitation of the salt on the membrane surface resulting in decreased flux and/or increased salt passage. In addition, an increase in recovery will increase the average salt concentration in the feed/reject stream and this produces a product water with increased salt content. Consequently, the recovery of a reverse osmosis plant is established after careful consideration of the desired product quality, the solubility limits of the feed constituents, feedwater availability and reject disposal requirements. 

Once the pretreatment study had been completed, it will be possible to decide on the type of elements to be used in the reverse osmosis unit. If the SDI of the pretreated feed is 3.0 or less, then either the spiral wound or hollow fine fiber elements can be used. The choice will depend on economics (element price) and desalination characteristics (flux and rejection). If the pretreated feed SDI is more than 3.0, then the spiral wound element should be used. When the decision as to element type is made, then it is appropriate to forward a copy of the pretreated feed water analysis to reverse osmosis element manufacturers to obtain a prediction of product water quality, recommended type of element, total number of elements required, possible problems with sparingly soluble compounds in the feedwater, allowable recovery, and price and delivery. 

Figure 4.13 shows a flow diagram for a reverse osmosis unit with 75% recovery on a brackish feed. The pretreated feed is routed to the high pressure pump where the feed pressure is raised to between 250 and 400 psig as required for brackish water desalination. The pressurized feed is then pumped to the first pass pressure vessels where about 50% of the feed is recovered as product and 50% is reject. The reject from the first pass pressure vessels is then routed to the second pass pressure vessels where, again, about 50% of the first pass reject is recovered as product and 50% is reject which is sent to waste. Thus, the overall recovery of the unit is 75% as product. As can be seen, a normal array for a 75% recovery unit is two first pass pressure vessels feeding one second pass pressure vessel or a 2-1 array. If the system recovery were from 40 to 60%, all of the pressure vessels would be in parallel. However, if the system recovery were raised to between 85 and 90%, the pressure vessels would be arranged in a 4-2-1 array. 

This equation produces accurate results for a membrane sample or a small element with a low recovery, e.g., 2% or less. However, a practical reverse osmosis system is designed to recover from 25 to 90% of the feedwater. This means that the concentration of the feed varies throughout the membrane system. At 90% recovery, the initial membranes will have a feed which is about 10 times less concentrated than the feed to the final membranes and the quality of the product water will vary incrementally throughout the system. The product water from the first membrane elements will be less concentrated than the product water from the last elements. The product water from the practical reverse osmosis system is combined in the product water manifold and its concentration is usually represented as the average product water concentration. The average product water concentration is determined by the following formula ... 

As Figure 4.13 shows, there are more elements in the first pass of a 75% recovery reverse osmosis system than in the second pass and the first pass elements produce more product. Thus, a greater percentage of the total product water is derived from the first pass and the total product water will be nearer in concentration to the first pass average than to the second pass average. 

Abstract The processes of lactic acid production include two key stages, which are (a) fermentation and (h) product recovery. In this study, fiee cell of Bifidobacterium longum was used to produce lactic acid from cheese whey. The produced lactic acid was then separated and purified from the fermentation broth using combination of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Nanofiltration membrane with a molecular weight cutofif of 100-400 Da was used to separate lactic acid from lactose and cells in the cheese whey fermentation broth in the first step. The obtained permeate from the above nanofiltration is mainly composed of lactic acid and water, which was then concentrated with a reverse osmosis membrane in the second step. Among the tested nanofiltration membranes, HL membrane from GE Osmonics has the highest lactose retention (97 1%). In the reverse osmosis process, the ADF membrane could retain 100% of lactic acid to obtain permeate with water only. The effect of membrane and pressure on permeate flux and retention of lactose/lactic acid was also reported in this paper. 

Among desalination technologies available today, reverse osmosis (RO) is usually the most economical process for wide range of water salinity. Main application includes production of high purity water, desalination of seawater and brackish water for a drinking water supply, treatment of waste water for environmental protection, and recovery of precious materials from industrial waste water. 

This phenomenon, called reverse osmosis, is used in a number of processes. An important commercial use is in the desalination of seawater or brackish water to produce fresh water. Unlike distillation and freezing processes used to remove solvents, reverse osmosis can operate at ambient temperature without phase change. This process is quite useful for processing of thermally and chemically unstable products. Applications include concentration of fruit juices and milk, recovery of protein and sugar from cheese whey, and concentration of enzymes. 

---