Removal of particulates

Gas purification processes fall into three categories the removal of gaseous impurities, the removal of particulate impurities, and ultrafine cleaning. The extra expense of the last process is only justified by the nature of the subsequent operations or the need to produce a pure gas stream. Because there are many variables in gas treating, several factors must be considered (/) the types and concentrations of contaminants in the gas (2) the degree of contaminant removal desired (J) the selectivity of acid gas removal required (4) the temperature, pressure, volume, and composition of the gas to be processed (5) the carbon dioxide-to-hydrogen sulfide ratio in the gas and (6) the desirabiUty of sulfur recovery on account of process economics or environmental issues. 

Removal of Particulate Matter. The amount of particulate entering a cooling system with the makeup water can be reduced by filtration and/or sedimentation processes. Particulate removal can also be accompHshed by filtration of recirculating cooling water. These methods do not remove all of the suspended matter from the cooling water. The level of fouling experienced is influenced by the effectiveness of the particular removal scheme employed, the water velocities in the process equipment, and the cycles of concentration maintained in the cooling tower. 

J. G. Wilson and D. W. Miller, "Removal of Particulate Matter from Fluid-Bed Catalytic Cracking Unit Stack Gases," f AirPollut. Mssoc. 7, 682 (Oct. 1967). 

Proteia and starch stains are removed by proteases and amylases, respectively. Fats and oils are generally difficult to remove at low wash temperatures by conventional detergents. By usiag Upases, it is possible to improve the removal of fats/oils of animal and vegetable origin even at temperatures where the fatty material is ia a soUd form. Particulate soils can be difficult to remove, especially if the particle sise is small. Removal of particulate soil from cotton fabric can be improved by use of a ceUulase which removes cellulose fibrils from the surface of the yam. 

Air pollution control systems using wet scrubbers will remove some water-soluble gases, but the removal of particulate matter is the primary concern for a control system. The air pollution control system, therefore, is usually a single device such as a wet scrubber, small-diameter multiple cyclones, fabric filters, or ESPs. The multicyclones are the least expensive system and the ESPs the most expensive. 

To gather information which will enable selection of appropriate control equipment. If a source test determines that the emission is 3000 mg of particulate per cubic meter and that it has a weight mean size of 5 p.m, a control device must be chosen which will collect enough particulate to meet some required standard, such as 200 mg per cubic meter. (4) To determine the efficiency of control equipment installed to reduce emissions. If a manufacturer supplies a device guaranteed to be 95% efficient for removal of particulate with a weight mean size of 5 /rm, the effluent stream must be sampled at the inlet and outlet of the device to determine if the guarantee has been met. 

To remove insoluble contaminants, various types of full-flow filters can be used. Two general types are usually selected surface filters and depth filters. Both types of filters are effective for the removal of particulate matter. 

A pesticide formulation plant should prepare and implement an emergency preparedness and response plan that takes into account neighboring land uses and the potential consequences of an emergency or accidental release of harmful substances. Measures to avoid the release of harmful substances should be incorporated in the design, operation, maintenance, and management of the plant. Pollution control equipment employed in this sector include baghouses for removal of particulate matter and carbon adsorption for removal of VOCs. 

This chapter describes the fundamentals of gas cleaning technology in branches of removal of particulates and gaseous compounds. This chapter also includes the fundamentals of particulate and gaseous measurements technology. 

Removal of particulates, colloidal matter, iron and organics. Multimedia, manganese, greensand, diatomaceous earth, brim, or carbon filter. Caution carbon filters not recommended unless absolutely required for the removal of color and odor (as they provide a medium for microbial growth). 

Centrifugal collectors Separators for the removal of particulate matter from gas streams, classified as... 

Field. One of several liigli voltage sections for tlie removal of particulates tliese fields are arranged in series (i.e., tlie gas passes from tlie first field into tlie second, etc.)... 

This deals with all equipment used for the removal of particulate matter and represents a wide range of possibilities. Several books cover this subject and only a few typical examples are quoted here. 

In perhaps more than 70% of cases, the major problem is the physical removal of particulate matter, but also in more than 70% of cases, the polishers selected utilize resin bead deep-bed polishers, which are not necessarily the optimum solution. 

The second contribution to the total wet Hg flux is the physical removal of particulate matter and the scavenging of RGHg from the atmosphere during precipitation events. 

A dielectrofilter [Lin and Benguigui, Sep. Purif. Methods, 10(1), 53 (1981) Sisson et al., Sep. Sei. Teennol., 30(7-9), 1421 (1995)] is a device which uses the action of an electric field to aid the filtration and removal of particulates from fluid media. A dielectrofilter can have a very obvious advantage over a mechanical filter in that it can remove particles which are much smaller than the flow channels in the filter. In contrast, the ideal mechanical filter must have all its passages smaller than the particles to be removed. The resultant flow resistance can be use-restrictive and energy-consuming unless a phenomenon such as dielectrofiltration is used. 

Removal of particulate organic nitrogen by filtering through a 0.45 xm pore... 

Removal of oxygen-consuming substances of wastewater in sewers, e.g., in terms of BOD or COD, is important when considering mechanical treatment. The impact on the environment of soluble species is thereby reduced, and production of biomass in the sewer may improve the removal of particulate COD in the treatment steps. 

Both concentrated and dilute waste were sent to a pair of John Zink thermal oxidizers equipped with adjustable venturi scrubbers for removal of particulates prior to stack discharge. Water process waste originating primarily from fermentation sectors was sent to the Carver-Greenfield evaporation system. The evaporator utilized a multistep oil dehydration process and was equipped with a centrifuge, waste heat boiler, and a venturi scrubber. The Clinton Laboratory reported an overall BOD and COD reduction of 90 and 99%, respectively, depending upon the configuration used. 

SAMPLE PREPARATION. Dry Illinois No. 6 (Herrin seam, -60 mesh) was used in the sorption studies. Analysis Found C, 74.37 H, 4.83 N, 1.76 S, 1.76 O (by difference), 8.74 Ash, 8.33 (duplicate). Approximately 10 g of the sample was exhaustively Soxhlet extracted with pyridine. Extractability was 18.7% (wt). The pyridine solution was then filtered through a 0.4 /xm filter to insure removal of particulates and colloidal material. The filter did not plug. Most of the pyridine was removed by rotovaporization under reduced pressure at 70-80 C. Approximately 200 mL of a methanol/water (80/20 vol) mixture and 2 mL of cone. HCl were added to the flask and the mixture was stirred under nitrogen for two days. The solid extract was then filtered and dried under vacuum at 105 "C for 24 hours. Analysis Found C, 80.0 H, 5.64 N, 1.85 S, 0.70 Ash, 0.30 (duplicate). 

The technology of arsenic waste reduction via filtration for removal of particulate arsenic from wastewater streams should be easily transferable to other semiconductor firms as well as to any other industry where heavy metal solids are produced. 

---