Standard reliability

There is no reliable standard method to characterize odor and specifications often indicate merely a not-unpleasant odor . 

Ion implantation is often used to produce reliable standards for quantification of SIMS analyses. Ion implantation allows the introducdon of a known amount of an element into a solid sample. A sample with a major component composition similar to that of the unknown sample may be implanted to produce an accurate standard. The accuracy of quandfication using this implantation method can be as good as 2%. 

The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC), established in 1968, and its associated ten regional councils have been reliability monitors of the electric bulk power system. Their emphasis on compliance with reliability standards through peer pressure was effective in the past. NERC and the councils, with oversight from FERC, are engaged in a complete restructuring of the reliability organizations. This move will ultimately involve a mo V c from peer pressure to mandatoi y compliance. 

Atmospheric nitrogen is a reliable standard for natural measurements. Nature 303 ... 

Medicinal chemists should be aware that inexperienced biologists can erroneously conclude that poorly aqueous soluble compounds are orally absorbed when compounds are dosed in pharmaceutically unacceptable solvents. Always ask what is the dosing vehicle Heroic combinations of DMSO, Cremophor, poly(ethylene glycol), Tween-80 and ethanol are unacceptable and misleading. In case of doubt consult with a pharmaceutical scientist colleague. The reliable standards are an aqueous solution (with perhaps a trace of DMSO) or a suspension (perhaps stabilized with an acceptable quantity of adjuvant, e.g. Tween-80). 

Standards are now used everywhere to demonstrate reliability. Standards have replaced good trust in reputations. Psychology, the relation of human understanding, has been replaced by the science of measurements. 

Alternatively, a standard fluorescent compound can be used whose corrected emission spectrum has been reported3 . Comparison of this spectrum with the technical spectrum recorded with the detection system provides the correction factors. The wavelength range must obviously cover the fluorescence spectrum to be corrected. Unfortunately, there is a limited number of reliable standards. 

Yet, for a venture to become a multi-million or multi-billion enterprise, management systems and processes need to be reliable, standards need to be adopted and adhered to, and consistency and predictability become important. The challenge for middle managers bears some similarity to that of those tasked with integrating an acquired company with a different culture than one s own. Yet, just as with integrating acquisitions, such a crucial process is often not handled very systematically. 

To obtain accurate results in qMSP/QM-MSP analyses, the best conditions have to be worked out to achieve reliable standard curves during the test trials. This could be achieved with the use of unmethylated and methylated templates such as placental DNA and in vitro methylated DNA, respectively, and by performing bisulfite treatment as described. To find the best condition for each gene, purify the DNA, calculate the concentration and copy numbers, and dilute the DNA sequentially (e.g., 1,1/2,1/4,1/8, 1/16, 1/32, and 1/64) and perform real-time PCR with several dilutions of the primers (e.g., 25, 50, 75ng each in various combinations). For example, you should see the amplification plots as indicated in Fig. 9.4 with 50% (Fig. 9.4A) or 25% (Fig. 9.4B) sequential dilution. These test trials and any other quantitative PCR (qPCR)ZQM-MSP experiments need to be done in duplicate or triplicate to ensure that the required skills and instruments for equal pipeting are in place, or the impacts could be minimized by averaging the results of the triplicate experiments. Similar to MSP, for each qMSP or QM-MSP trials use placental and... 

Real samples. The move to analyze real samples represents a move toward the unknown. Not only are the results of the analysis unknown ahead of time, but other variables relating to sample inhomogeneity, sample preparation variables, additional sources of error, etc. are introduced. A large number (>30) of duplicate samples should be analyzed so that a reliable standard deviation and a reliable control chart can be established. The ultimate purpose of this work is to characterize what is a typical analysis for this kind of sample so that one can know when the method is under statistical control and when... 

As anticipated, lower temperature increases the number of observations from an X-ray diffraction data collection (at constant radiation dose). This is however just one of the advantages that could improve a structure solution or a refinement. In fact, a reduced thermal motion usually implies a more reliable standard model, given that for smaller atomic displacements the harmonic approximation is more appropriate and less correlation is found between variables within a least squares refinement. This returns higher precision of the parameters calculated from those variables (for example bond distances, bond angles, etc.). 

The spectrophotometer should be calibrated so that the bands are observed at their proper frequencies or wavelengths. Proper calibration can be made with reliable standards, such as poly (styrene) film. 

On the other hand, liquid standards are quite straightforward and reasonable analytical technique can insure reliable standards. 

Finding local chemical suppliers that can meet price, product quality, and reliability standards is another major hurdle. Chemical companies have often learned the hard way that the quality of the final products can be very different from that of the original samples. Extensive screenings, checks, and quality tests are indispensable. 

The quality of the available data are generally of a reliable standard, particularly the more recent X-ray diffraction studies. Caution, however, must be exercised when evaluating much of the earlier gas phase work, in view of limitations in both contemporary instrumentation and experimental methods which usually require implicit assumptions about molecular geometry. Such data are generally best assessed in groups, and reliance given to systematic trends rather than absolute values. 

After is has been determined which compounds are of importance, they must be available for use as analytical standards. In the absence of a reliable standard, qualitative and quantitative data cannot be obtained. In cases where standards are not available commercially, we have synthesized our own. If only the technical material is available, it may be purified to analytical quality. A very important part of the entire quality assurance portion of methods development is accurate and reliable standards. 

An SD-DSC test is highly useful for screening the danger of explosion of self-reactive substances. When the result of an SD-DSC test lies in the border zone between the explosive and nonexplosive regions, however, a more reliable standard propagational test should be conducted to determine which quality is accurate. 

The success of studies on ocean chemistry usually hinges on the availability of adequate analytical methodology and expertise. The nature of the chemical problems involved the size and heterogeneity of the ocean the extremes of concentration, composition, temperature, and pressure and the dynamic interactions at its interfaces with the lithosphere, atmosphere, and biosphere create challenging and often unique analytical problems. Current analytical methods are limited, and improved capability in referee, routine, monitoring, and in situ analyses is needed. Valid sampling, the use of reliable standards in calibration, and the collaborative evaluation of methods under real-world conditions are important. 

The field desorption (FD) literature of nucleosides is not particularly rich. Nevertheless, most of the common nucleosides are reported to give an abundant [M + H]+ ion - and, as observed by Wood, adenosine is used as a reliable standard for FD experiments by various instrument manufacturers. 

Although the standard kilogram is stored at constant temperature and humidity, unwanted matter can build up on its surface. Scientists have been looking for a more reliable standard for mass. Research and describe alternate standards that have been proposed. Eind out why no alternate standard has been chosen. 

Unfortunately, the Supreme Court in Daubert could not, and did not, resolve all the difficult issues regarding admissibility of expert testimony. One question left unanswered by Daubert was does the validation (reliability) standard apply only to traditional scientific evidence, or does it also apply to other technical , specialized , or social science evidence A second question was does the validation (reliability) standard apply only to the methodology underlying the expert s evidence and opinion, or does it also apply to the reasoning process used by the expert in... 

In DuPont v. Castillo, the Florida District Court of Appeals (Fifth District) said it is the function of the court to not permit cases to be resolved on the basis of evidence for which a predicate of reliability has not been established. Reliability is fundamental to issues involved in the admissibility of evidence... Novel scientific evidence must also be shown to be reliable on some basis other than simply that it is the opinion of the witness who seeks to offer the opinion. Finally, in Slay v. Keller Industries, Inc., No. 1001091, Ala. (2001), the Alabama Supreme Court concluded that mere assertion of belief, without any supporting research, testing, or experiments, cannot qualify as proper scientific testimony under either the general acceptance standard enunciated in Frye or the scientifically reliable standard of Daubert. ... 

---