Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Parameters, from calculation

Table IV. Copolymerization Parameters from Calculations Using Equation 33... Table IV. Copolymerization Parameters from Calculations Using Equation 33...
Fig. 7-15. Left Nucleation rate in the binary system H2S04-H20 at 298 K as a function of relative humidity and with the H2S04 activity p/ps as a parameter [from calculations of Mirabel and Katz (1974)]. Right Steady-state H2S04 number density required for a nucleation rate of 1 particle/cm3 s as a function of relative humidity. The solid lines and the triangular point are from calculations of the authors indicated the squares with error bars were obtained experimentally by Boulaud et al. (1977). Fig. 7-15. Left Nucleation rate in the binary system H2S04-H20 at 298 K as a function of relative humidity and with the H2S04 activity p/ps as a parameter [from calculations of Mirabel and Katz (1974)]. Right Steady-state H2S04 number density required for a nucleation rate of 1 particle/cm3 s as a function of relative humidity. The solid lines and the triangular point are from calculations of the authors indicated the squares with error bars were obtained experimentally by Boulaud et al. (1977).
For all calculations reported here, binary parameters from VLE data were obtained using the principle of maximum likelihood as discussed in Chapter 6, Binary parameters for partially miscible pairs were obtained from mutual-solubility data alone. [Pg.64]

The off-diagonal elements of the variance-covariance matrix represent the covariances between different parameters. From the covariances and variances, correlation coefficients between parameters can be calculated. When the parameters are completely independent, the correlation coefficient is zero. As the parameters become more correlated, the correlation coefficient approaches a value of +1 or -1. [Pg.102]

Connecting the measured points will result in a curve describing the area - depth relationship of the top of fhe reservoir. If we know the gross thickness (H) from logs we can establish a second curve representing the area - depth plot for the base of the reservoir. The area between the two lines will equal the volume of rock between the two markers. The area above the OWC is the oil bearing GRV. The other parameters to calculate STOIIP can be taken as averages from our petrophysical evaluation (see Section 5.4.). Note that this method assumes that the reservoir thickness is constant across the whole field. If this is not a reasonable approximation, then the method is not applicable, and an alternative such as the area - thickness method must be used (see below). [Pg.156]

The development of Remote Field Eddy Current probes requires experience and expensive experiments. The numerical simulation of electromagnetic fields can be used not only for a better understanding of the Remote Field effect but also for the probe lay out. Geometrical parameters of the prohe can be derived from calculation results as well as inspection parameters. An important requirement for a realistic prediction of the probe performance is the consideration of material properties of the tube for which the probe is designed. The experimental determination of magnetization curves is necessary and can be satisfactory done with a simple experimental setup. [Pg.317]

Using the heat parameters from Problem 12, calculate of ethane. The... [Pg.58]

A variety of equations-of-state have been applied to supercritical fluids, ranging from simple cubic equations like the Peng-Robinson equation-of-state to the Statistical Associating Fluid Theoiy. All are able to model nonpolar systems fairly successfully, but most are increasingly chaUenged as the polarity of the components increases. The key is to calculate the solute-fluid molecular interaction parameter from the pure-component properties. Often the standard approach (i.e. corresponding states based on critical properties) is of limited accuracy due to the vastly different critical temperatures of the solutes (if known) and the solvents other properties of the solute... [Pg.2002]

Strained set of lattice parameters and calculating the stress from the peak shifts, taking into account the angle of the detected sets of planes relative to the surface (see discussion above). If the assumed unstrained lattice parameters are incorrect not all peaks will give the same values. It should be borne in mind that, because of stoichiometry or impurity effects, modified surface films often have unstrained lattice parameters that are different from the same materials in the bulk form. In addition, thin film mechanical properties (Young s modulus and Poisson ratio) can differ from those of bulk materials. Where pronounced texture and stress are present simultaneously analysis can be particularly difficult. [Pg.217]

MNDOC has the same functional form as MNDO, however, electron correlation is explicitly calculated by second-order perturbation theory. The derivation of the MNDOC parameters is done by fitting the correlated MNDOC results to experimental data. Electron correlation in MNDO is only included implicitly via the parameters, from fitting to experimental results. Since the training set only includes ground-state stable molecules, MNDO has problems treating systems where the importance of electron comelation is substantially different from normal molecules. MNDOC consequently performs significantly better for systems where this is not the case, such as transition structures and excited states. [Pg.87]

Calculated and experimental values of the cohesive energy (eV), lattice parameters (A) and elastic moduli (GPa). The experimental values of the cohesive energy have been taken from (Hultgren, et al. 1973) for the lattice parameters from (Pearson 1967) and for the elastic moduli from (Tanaka, etal. 1996). [Pg.358]

Statement functions are defined before any other executable statements in the program and are called in the same way that subprogram or intrinsic functions are called (see subprogram statements later). They are one-line expressions that receive one or more parameters from the calling statement and return a single calculated value to the function name in the calling statement. For example, a statement function defined as... [Pg.121]

The formation abrasiveness, drillability and bit-bearing parameters are calculated from the following formulas based on data available from previous drilling experience. [Pg.1092]

Note Using the above obtained values for K, A and S, one may attempt to optimize drilling parameters from Equations 4-278, 4-279 and 4-280 however, in the case considered, the bit life is limited by bearings wear. Consequently Equations 4-278, 4-279 and 4-280 are not applicable. Nevertheless a simple trial-and-error calculation can be used to find the desired parameters. [Pg.1095]

TABLE II. Comparison Between Experimental EJRTC with the Value Given by the Yang-Li Quasi-Chemical Theory for Cu-Au Superlattices. Interaction Parameter, w, Calculated from Tc and the Yang-Li Theory... [Pg.127]

These equations allow either to predict the swelling degree (w = l/(p) as a function of external conditions or to calculate the network parameters from the correlation between the theoretical and experimental dependencies w(q) or w(p) [22, 102], An example of such a correlation is given in Fig. 2 and 5. As can be seen, theoretical predictions are in good agreement with experimental data. However, when the outer solution contains multivalent cations, only a semi-quantitative agreement is attained. [Pg.120]

Only true rate constants (i.e., those with no unresolved concentration dependences) can properly be treated by the Arrhenius or transition state models. Meaningful values are not obtained if pseudo-order rate constants or the rates themselves are correlated by Eq. (7-1) or Eq. (7-2). This error is found not uncommonly in the literature. The activation parameters from such calculations, A and AS in particular, are meaningless. [Pg.160]

Finally we mention the very recent development of a scale of directional substituent polarizability parameters from ab initio calculations of polarizability potentials135. It is expected that this scale of oa values will prove of considerable utility in correlation analysis, often in association with oF values. The o, value of S02Me is given as — 0.62 cf. H, 0.00 N02, - 0.26 COMe, - 0.55 SMe, - 0.68 t-Bu, - 0.75. [Pg.517]

Once the model was complete, it was adjusted to a steady state condition and tested using historic carbon isotope data from the atmosphere, oceans and polar ice. Several important parameters were calculated and chosen at this stage. Sensitivity analysis indicated that results dispersal of the missing carbon - were significantly influenced by the size of the vegetation carbon pool, its assimilation rate, the concentration of preindustrial atmospheric carbon used, and the CO2 fertilization factor. The model was also sensitive to several factors related to fluxes between ocean reservoirs. [Pg.418]

Refsgaard HH, Jensen BF, Brockhoff PB, Padkjaer SB, Guldbrandt M and Christensen MS. In silico prediction of membrane permeability from calculated molecular parameters. J Med Chem 2005 48 805-11. [Pg.509]

From a detailed study of the exchange, at various temperatures (in the range 0 to 20 °C) and acidities at a constant ionic strength of p = 1.0 Af, the kinetic parameters were calculated, k and k 2 k 2 = k2K- have values of 0.48 l.mole". sec and 0.22 sec", respectively, at 0 °C. For the exchange pathway associated with ky, values of the activation enthalpy and entropy of 12.6 kcal.mole" and — 14 cal.deg . mole , respectively, were reported. For the second pathway... [Pg.112]

The ESR measurements were made at RT or 77 K on a Varian E-9 spectrometer (X-band), equipped with an on-line computer for data analysis. Spin-Hamiltonian parameters (g and A values) were obtained from calculated spectra using the program SIM14 A [26]. The absolute concentration of the paramagnetic species was determined from the integrated area of the spectra. Values of g were determined using as reference the sharp peak at g = 2.0008 of the E i center (marked with an asterisk in Fig. 3) the center was formed by UV irradiation of the silica dewar used as sample holder. [Pg.692]


See other pages where Parameters, from calculation is mentioned: [Pg.272]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.176]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.405 , Pg.441 ]




SEARCH



Calculation from molecular parameters

Parameter calculation

Structural parameters, calculation from

Structural parameters, calculation from branching theory

© 2024 chempedia.info