Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Systematic trends

On the basis of the preceding discussion, the systematic trend in AV observed for water exchange on [M(H20)6]2+ may be rationalized through a More-O Ferral type of diagram (4, 7) as shown in Fig. 4. The bond-making and bond-breaking contributions to AV are plotted on the two axes, which are scaled to AVt for a D mechanism being... [Pg.15]

Dynamical quantities do behave differently, however. This is shown for the diffusion constant in Fig. 5.18, to demonstrate that there is a systematic trend that can be clearly observed in the simulations the greater the polydispersity index p (or the parameter d) the larger the spread in the diffusion constant. [Pg.134]

A closer look at the original data published by Johnson, Gill, and Pople, 1993, reveals that use of the gradient-corrected LYP correlation functional instead of VWN increases atomization energies for non-hydride species quite significantly, while those containing hydrogen atoms are reduced. This rather systematic trend is portrayed in Table 9-2 for a few example cases. [Pg.155]

EXAFS has been used to determine the second hydration shell of zinc in aqueous solution. Aqueous solutions of zinc nitrate over a range of concentrations were examined and a Zn—O distance of 2.05 A for the first shell of the six-coordinate zinc center found, which is unaffected by concentration. The second hydration shell shows a Zn—O distance which has no systematic trend but an average distance of 4.1 A. The coordination number for the second shell is 11.6 1.6 with unusual behavior for the most concentrated 2.7 M solution, which has a decrease in coordination number to 6.8 1.5 340... [Pg.1173]

The rare earths have been studied extensively, but systematic trends are difficult to find, especially because they are difficult to purify. Separating them one from another is difficult because of their chemical similarity. Also, they form stable oxides so it is difficult to remove traces of oxygen from them. Much information about their hardnesses has been summarized by Scott (1978) and may be found in the handbook of Gschneidner and Eyring. [Pg.101]

Hybertsen MS, Venkataraman L, Klare JE, Whalley AC, Steigerwald ML, Nuckolls C (2008) Amine-linked single-molecule circuits systematic trends across molecular families. J Phys Condens Matter 20(37) 374115... [Pg.32]

In figure 6 are presented some of the available 210Pb profiles in deep sea sediments. The data available to-date yield values ranging between (20-400) cm2/103 year for particle mixing coefficients, K [69]. The data also show that the mixing coefficients do not exhibit any systematic trend either with the sediment type or with sedimentation rate [69]. [Pg.375]

Fig. 4.6. Comparison of D/H measurements at high redshift from Lyman-limit and damped Lyman-a systems. The measurements come from O Meara et al. (2001 3 Lyman-limit systems and one marginal DLA), Crighton et al. (2004 the highest column density Lyman-limit system), Kirkman et al. (2003 another marginal DLA), Pettini Bowen (2001), Levshakov et al. (2002) and O Meara et al. (2006) (three classical DLAs). There is no convincing evidence for systematic trends with either column density or metallicity up to about 1/30 solar. Fig. 4.6. Comparison of D/H measurements at high redshift from Lyman-limit and damped Lyman-a systems. The measurements come from O Meara et al. (2001 3 Lyman-limit systems and one marginal DLA), Crighton et al. (2004 the highest column density Lyman-limit system), Kirkman et al. (2003 another marginal DLA), Pettini Bowen (2001), Levshakov et al. (2002) and O Meara et al. (2006) (three classical DLAs). There is no convincing evidence for systematic trends with either column density or metallicity up to about 1/30 solar.
Most energetic contributions are, as we have discussed, difficult to predict and large experimental efforts have for that reason been devoted to derive systematic trends in the energetics of classes of materials. In this chapter we will try to convey an overview of periodic trends in the thermodynamic properties of inorganic compounds and we will also present selected examples illustrating some of the more usual rationalization schemes. Finally, trends in enthalpy of mixing are treated. Also here we aim to look at trends and rationalization schemes. The chapter is by no means exhaustive - only selected classes of compounds and selected rationalization schemes are discussed. [Pg.199]

Systematic trends are shown after MMI extraction and analysis for a number of elements, including Cu, Au and Ag. Figure 3 shows the range of MMI values obtained for Cu in overbank (SOS) samples. [Pg.233]

However, large between-laboratory variabilities occurred that are indicative of poor reproducibility of methods. In so far as systematic trends could be observed, FIA-MS resulted more often in significantly lower concentrations than LC-MS or LC-FL methods. Within the LC-MS methods, the APCI interface yielded quantitative results which were invariably less than those obtained with LC-ESI-MS. This aspect is discussed in more detail in Chapter 4.3. LC-FL data were generally in fair-to-good agreement with LC-ESI-MS data. This held true for both LAS and NPEO analyses. [Pg.551]

Table IV is an attempt to summarize the results of these proton transfer studies in nonaqueous solvents. There is no systematic trend in what seems to be the rate limiting step in contrast to the attractive Eigen-Wilkins generalization for the mechanism of metal ion complexation. Obviously, many more proton transfer kinetic studies in nonaqueous solutions are needed for beautiful generalizations to emerge. Whether investigators will have the patience to carry them out or not is the only uncertainty. Table IV is an attempt to summarize the results of these proton transfer studies in nonaqueous solvents. There is no systematic trend in what seems to be the rate limiting step in contrast to the attractive Eigen-Wilkins generalization for the mechanism of metal ion complexation. Obviously, many more proton transfer kinetic studies in nonaqueous solutions are needed for beautiful generalizations to emerge. Whether investigators will have the patience to carry them out or not is the only uncertainty.
Computational efforts using DPT calculations as well as kinetic modeling of reactivities based on Monte Carlo simulations or mean field mefh-ods have been employed to study elementary processes on Pt surfaces. 2 228 Unraveling systematic trends in structure versus reactivity relations remains a formidable challenge due to fhe complex nafure of sfrucfural effects in electrocatalysis. [Pg.407]

Because metals differ in size, charge, and electronic stractnre, no two metals behave exactly the same in the same solvent extraction system, not even for the same class of solntes. Nevertheless, there are systematic trends in the formation and extraction of these complexes, as described in Chapter 3. Here, the emphasis is on models that give a quantitative description of the extraction within each type or class. [Pg.130]

It is assumed that the intrinsic hypothesis holds within the limited neighborhood that is used in calculating the kriging estimates. That is, eight measurements will be used by the kriging estimator and within the limited neighborhood (with a radius of approximately 1000 feet) that these measurements occur it is assumed that there is no drift or systematic trend. [Pg.217]

Structural diversity is achieved through the use of nonbonded pairs of electrons on the ligand of both type II complexes to coordinate additional metal atoms. The S—S distances of known complexes range from 1.98 to 2.15 A. Most S—S distances are intermediate between the distance of 1.89 A for Sj ( Zg ) (104) and 2.13 A for ( Zg+) in Na2S2 (50). The main S—S distances show no clear systematic trend with structural type (cf. Table II). [Pg.111]

Blank value at the start and at the end allow identifbation of some systematic trends... [Pg.285]


See other pages where Systematic trends is mentioned: [Pg.97]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.67]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.263 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.263 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.263 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.263 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info